本文選題：體育文化 + 文化產(chǎn)品�。� 參考：《體育學(xué)刊》2017年06期

【摘要】：以文化再生產(chǎn)理論為視角,對我國有關(guān)體育概念的爭論進(jìn)行分析,研究認(rèn)為體育及其相關(guān)概念作為文化產(chǎn)品是其不同歷史時期和發(fā)展階段的呈現(xiàn),力圖追尋體育的絕對真義不符合文化再生產(chǎn)規(guī)律;體育概念爭論是社會研究方法的重大轉(zhuǎn)向,對體育本質(zhì)的認(rèn)識體現(xiàn)人類思維模式的重要轉(zhuǎn)變;對體育起源問題的研究是本體論思維模式的反映,對這一宏觀問題的微觀追究,本身就是一種邏輯矛盾;中國古代存在豐富的體育現(xiàn)象,是體育實踐再生產(chǎn)過程;體育概念的討論關(guān)涉學(xué)術(shù)群體稟賦資本和慣習(xí),以及權(quán)力正當(dāng)性的場域之爭。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of cultural reproduction theory, this paper analyzes the controversy about sports concept in China, and points out that sports and its related concepts, as cultural products, are presented in different historical periods and stages of development. Trying hard to pursue the absolute true meaning of sports is not in accordance with the law of cultural reproduction, the controversy of sports concept is a major turn of social research methods, and the understanding of the essence of sports reflects the important transformation of human thinking mode. The study on the origin of sports is a reflection of the ontological thinking mode, and the microscopic investigation of this macroscopic problem is itself a logical contradiction, and there are abundant sports phenomena in ancient China, which is the process of sports practice reproduction. The discussion of the concept of sports is related to the academic group endowment capital and habit, as well as the field dispute of the legitimacy of power.
【作者單位】： 淮北師范大學(xué)體育學(xué)院;
【基金】：2015年安徽省教育廳高校人文社科重點研究項目(SK2015A92) 2016國家體育總局健身氣功中心科研課題 2016校級共青團(tuán)創(chuàng)新課題(GQT201620)
【分類號】：G80

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 何妍;夏成龍;;文化再生產(chǎn)論——布迪厄理論在民俗體育文化開發(fā)中的運用[J];體育研究與教育;2014年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 吳茜;上海賽馬傳統(tǒng)的文化再生產(chǎn)研究[D];上海體育學(xué)院;2016年

，

本文編號：1844527