本文選題：湖北省 + 事業(yè)單位　； 參考：《華中師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：事業(yè)單位是我國公共服務(wù)的保障和改善民生、促進經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的重要力量。我國大部分體育場館都是以事業(yè)單位體制運行,事業(yè)單位體育場館是我國政府為人民群眾提供公共體育服務(wù)的重要載體,既要積極響應(yīng)“全民健身”的號召,為大眾提供健身場所,保障人民的體育權(quán)利,又要承擔“奧運爭光計劃”的重任。湖北省成為場館改革試點省份后,積極推進場館的改革,雖然初步取得了成效,但在一定程度上仍難以避免事業(yè)單位體制的固有矛盾,如場館的所有權(quán)與經(jīng)營權(quán)并未徹底分離,場館運營的專業(yè)化水平不高,場館扶持政策不完善等問題影響了公益事業(yè)的健康發(fā)展。積極探索體育場館運營管理的新模式,努力實現(xiàn)體育場館管理體制和機制的創(chuàng)新己成為各界關(guān)注的焦點。本文通過對湖北省事業(yè)單位大型體育場館的運營管理現(xiàn)狀進行調(diào)查研究,挖掘其成功經(jīng)驗,也指出其不足,以期為湖北省事業(yè)單位體育場館的良性運營提出有益的參考,同時,也為其他省份事業(yè)單位體育場館的運營提供有益借鑒。本文采用文獻資料法、專家訪談法、問卷調(diào)查法等研究方法對洪山體育中心、新華路體育中心等湖北省試點場館進行實地考察,并結(jié)合全國第六次體育場地普查數(shù)據(jù)從經(jīng)濟學和管理學的角度對湖北省事業(yè)單位體育場館運營管理現(xiàn)狀從進行梳理與探討,主要從場館運營管理中的運營方式、運營內(nèi)容和人員機制等方面進行分析。通過研究,本文得出以下主要結(jié)論:1、湖北省事業(yè)單位大型體育場館運營方式呈多樣化發(fā)展,但還存在效益不高,部分場館的營業(yè)收入雖然能夠基本彌補日常開支,但巨額的維護費仍不同程度地依靠政府財政補貼。2、湖北省事業(yè)單位大型體育場館仍然堅持公益性的屬性,全民健身中心仍然作為首選定位。3、湖北省事業(yè)單位大型體育場館,大部分都選擇公益二類運營路徑,少數(shù)選擇繼續(xù)留在公益一類的序列,原有部分場館選擇企業(yè)化改革,公共體育服務(wù)供給主體呈多元化發(fā)展。4、湖北省大部分事業(yè)單位體育場館人事制度不完善,運營團隊專業(yè)性不強法人治理結(jié)構(gòu)的建立得到共識,但實踐力度不夠。最后本文建議:1、深化湖北省事業(yè)單位場館改革,加快體制機制的創(chuàng)新,在經(jīng)營者力所不及的情況下促進場館的所有權(quán)和經(jīng)營權(quán)的分離,2、促進湖北省場館體育場館改革與構(gòu)建公共體育服務(wù)體系的聯(lián)系;加強事業(yè)單位法人治理結(jié)構(gòu)的實踐力度,完善人才招聘制度,提升場館管理人員的專業(yè)素養(yǎng)。3、加強湖北省政府和市場的銜接機制,完善公共體育服務(wù)購買標準,優(yōu)化市場環(huán)境。4、加強湖北省場館發(fā)展的所需的系政策支持,降低場館運營成本。
[Abstract]:Institutions are the important force to guarantee and improve the people's livelihood and promote the economic development of our country's public service. Most of the stadiums and gymnasiums in our country are operated under the system of public institutions. The stadiums and gymnasiums of public institutions are the important carriers for the government to provide public sports services to the masses of the people. It is necessary to respond positively to the call of "national fitness". To provide fitness places for the public, to protect the people's sports rights, but also to bear the "Olympic glory project" heavy responsibility. After Hubei Province became a pilot province for stadiums and gymnasiums reform, although it has made initial achievements, it is still difficult to avoid the inherent contradictions in the institution system to a certain extent. For example, the ownership and management rights of the stadiums and gymnasiums have not been completely separated. The professional level of stadiums and stadiums is not high and the policy of supporting stadiums and stadiums is not perfect, which affects the healthy development of public welfare undertakings. Actively exploring the new mode of stadiums and gymnasiums management and making great efforts to realize the innovation of stadiums and gymnasiums management system and mechanism has become the focus of attention from all walks of life. Through the investigation and research on the present situation of the operation and management of the large sports stadiums and gymnasiums in Hubei Province, this paper excavates its successful experience and points out its shortcomings, in order to provide a useful reference for the sound operation of the stadiums and gymnasiums of the public institutions in Hubei Province, at the same time, Also for other provinces institutions to provide useful reference for the operation of stadiums and stadiums. This paper uses the methods of literature, expert interview, questionnaire investigation and other research methods to investigate the Hongshan Sports Center, Xinhua Road Sports Center and other Hubei experimental stadiums on the spot. And combining with the data of the sixth National Sports Field Survey, from the angle of economics and management, this paper combs and discusses the present situation of the operation and management of the stadiums and gymnasiums in Hubei Province, mainly from the operation mode of the stadiums and gymnasiums. Operation content and personnel mechanism are analyzed. Based on the research, this paper draws the following main conclusion: 1, the operation mode of large sports stadiums and gymnasiums in Hubei Province has diversified development, but there are still not high benefits. Although the operating income of some stadiums and gymnasiums can basically make up for the daily expenses, However, the huge maintenance fees still depend on the government financial subsidies to varying degrees. The large sports venues of Hubei institutions still adhere to the attribute of public welfare. The National Fitness Center is still the preferred orientation .3. the large-scale stadiums and gymnasiums of Hubei public institutions are still regarded as the first choice. Most of them choose the second type of operation path of public welfare, a few choose to remain in the sequence of public welfare, and some of the original venues and stadiums choose the enterprise-oriented reform. The main body of public sports service supply has diversified development. The personnel system of stadiums and stadiums in most public institutions in Hubei Province is not perfect, and the establishment of the management structure of the operation team is not professional, but the practice is not strong enough. Finally, this paper suggests that we should deepen the reform of public institutions' stadiums in Hubei Province and speed up the innovation of the system and mechanism. To promote the separation of ownership and management right of stadiums and gymnasiums, to promote the connection between the reform of stadiums and stadiums in Hubei Province and to construct the public sports service system, to strengthen the practice of the corporate governance structure of public institutions, To improve the talent recruitment system, to enhance the professional literacy of stadiums and gymnasiums, to strengthen the linking mechanism between the Hubei Provincial Government and the market, and to improve the purchasing standards of public sports services, Optimize the market environment. 4, strengthen the necessary policy support for the development of Hubei stadiums and reduce the operating cost of the stadiums and gymnasiums.
【學位授予單位】：華中師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G818

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳元欣;姬慶;;大型體育場館運營內(nèi)容產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀、問題及對策[J];首都體育學院學報;2015年06期

2 史海旺;;淺析移動互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時代的圈子體育[J];當代體育科技;2015年09期

3 陳文倩;;我國大型公共體育場館事業(yè)單位分類改革研究[J];中國學校體育(高等教育);2015年02期

4 徐曉新;張秀蘭;余曉敏;;公益類事業(yè)單位改革:來自社會企業(yè)的啟示[J];北京師范大學學報(社會科學版);2013年05期

5 夏正清;江龍;;上海公共體育場館運營管理模式創(chuàng)新研究[J];體育文化導(dǎo)刊;2013年09期

6 繆振尚;;湖北省公共體育場館經(jīng)營管理的模式研究[J];體育世界(下旬刊);2013年02期

7 改革雜志社專題研究部;羅重譜;;中國事業(yè)單位分類改革軌跡及走向判斷[J];改革;2012年04期

8 李文釗;董克用;;中國事業(yè)單位改革:理念與政策建議[J];中國人民大學學報;2010年05期

9 張宏;;我國體育場館經(jīng)營管理模式的現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展趨勢[J];西安體育學院學報;2009年04期

10 周良君;譚建湘;;深圳市大型公共體育場館管理體制改革的現(xiàn)狀與對策[J];上海體育學院學報;2009年02期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前6條

1 劉燁;大中型體育場館運營管理研究[D];武漢體育學院;2014年

2 張伊;我國事業(yè)單位改革的財政思考[D];東北財經(jīng)大學;2013年

3 李思閱;我國大型公共體育場館事業(yè)單位體制改革現(xiàn)狀研究[D];北京體育大學;2013年

4 杜娜;事業(yè)單位類型公共體育場館分類改革研究[D];華中師范大學;2013年

5 茍亮;我國大型體育場館委托經(jīng)營管理模式的現(xiàn)狀分析[D];西安體育學院;2013年

6 梁棟;江蘇省大型體育場館運營現(xiàn)狀及對策[D];蘇州大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1834770