本文選題：男籃　切入點(diǎn)：內(nèi)線隊(duì)員　出處：《首都體育學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：自“中國移動(dòng)長城”姚明、巴特爾、王治郅告別中國男籃,中國男籃成績跌宕起伏,在世界排名不斷下滑。在里約奧運(yùn)會(huì)上又五戰(zhàn)全負(fù),排名小組最后。為了探究當(dāng)今中國男籃與世界強(qiáng)隊(duì)內(nèi)線隊(duì)員在能力和技戰(zhàn)術(shù)配合上是否存在較大差距以及找到哪些地方存在差距而哪些地方又繼承了中國男籃內(nèi)線的傳統(tǒng)優(yōu)勢。通過觀看里約奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國男籃和與賽對手的15場比賽,對比當(dāng)今世界強(qiáng)隊(duì)美國、塞爾維亞、澳大利亞隊(duì)中內(nèi)線隊(duì)員的得分能力、籃板水平、進(jìn)攻基礎(chǔ)配合的特點(diǎn)等,主要運(yùn)用了專家訪談法、錄像觀察法、問卷調(diào)查法、文獻(xiàn)資料法、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)法、邏輯分析法等對中國男籃和與賽對手內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)行了分析。論文主題主要分兩個(gè)大的部分,第一部分是對各個(gè)隊(duì)內(nèi)線隊(duì)員的各種比賽數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行歸類分析,第二部分是對各個(gè)隊(duì)內(nèi)線隊(duì)員在進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合上進(jìn)行各種配合的定義、統(tǒng)計(jì)以及對比分析。從基礎(chǔ)數(shù)據(jù)到各種配合對中國男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員與對手進(jìn)行整體全面的對比,主要研究結(jié)論如下:1、通過影響內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合的基礎(chǔ)數(shù)據(jù)對比看,中國男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員身高上有一定優(yōu)勢,但是BMI值低于小組平均水平,比賽中展開的基礎(chǔ)配合中對抗能力不足。在投籃命中率、籃板球、得分方面較低,中國男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員中大前鋒表現(xiàn)好于中鋒。在失誤上,由于本屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國男籃啟用大量新人,心里素質(zhì)和大賽經(jīng)驗(yàn)不足導(dǎo)致內(nèi)線隊(duì)員失誤比同組其他隊(duì)伍高出許多。2、世界優(yōu)秀球隊(duì)內(nèi)線隊(duì)員參與到進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合人員廣,進(jìn)攻點(diǎn)多,外線與內(nèi)線隊(duì)員之間基礎(chǔ)配合較為默契、流暢。中國男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員參與進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合的進(jìn)攻點(diǎn)過于單一,過于依賴易建聯(lián)這一個(gè)點(diǎn)的進(jìn)攻。新的內(nèi)線球員與外線老隊(duì)員之間默契程度不高,配合不夠流暢。3、通過錄像觀察和對各種進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合的統(tǒng)計(jì)上可以看出中國男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合的意識(shí)強(qiáng)。內(nèi)線隊(duì)員在突破分球,送出傳切球以及策應(yīng)配合進(jìn)攻效果上與對手比有著自己的優(yōu)勢。4、中國男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員在進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合中的有球掩護(hù)時(shí)機(jī)的選擇,有球掩護(hù)位置的選擇和無球掩護(hù)的方向的選擇存在不足,傳切配合中切入后直接進(jìn)攻能力不強(qiáng)。5、當(dāng)今世界男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員在進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合整體發(fā)展的趨勢為掩護(hù)配合、突分配合和傳切配合應(yīng)用的次數(shù)及比重增多,各種配合之間相互組合情況增多,特別是其它配合與掩護(hù)配合相結(jié)合,而策應(yīng)配合次數(shù)相應(yīng)有所減少。策應(yīng)配合的節(jié)奏加快,形式上有趨同于傳切配合的趨勢。
[Abstract]:Since China Mobile the Great Wall said goodbye to China Men's Basketball team by Yao Ming, Ba Teer and Wang Zhizhi, the Chinese men's basketball team has experienced ups and downs in the world rankings. In order to find out whether there is a big gap in the ability and skill and tactics of the insiders of the Chinese men's basketball team and the world strong team, and to find out where the gap exists and which place has inherited the inside of the Chinese men's basketball team. The traditional advantage of the line. By watching the Chinese men's basketball team at the Rio Olympics and 15 games with rivals, By comparing the scoring ability, rebounding level, and the characteristics of basic offensive cooperation among the inline players of the world's strong teams, such as the United States, Serbia and Australia, we mainly use the methods of expert interview, video observation, questionnaire investigation, literature and materials, etc. Mathematical statistics and logic analysis are used to analyze the Chinese men's basketball team and the inline players of the match. The main theme of the thesis is divided into two parts. The first part is the classification and analysis of the competition data of the members of each team. The second part is the definition, statistics and comparative analysis of each team's internal team members on the basis of offensive tactics. From basic data to various kinds of cooperation, the Chinese men's basketball inline team members are compared with their opponents in an overall and comprehensive way. The main conclusions of the study are as follows: 1. By comparing the basic data that affect the basic cooperation of offensive tactics among the inner team members, we can see that there are certain advantages in the height of the inner line members of the Chinese men's basketball team, but the BMI value is lower than the average level of the group. The basic cooperation in the game is not enough to fight. In shooting, rebounding, scoring aspects are low, the Chinese men's basketball inline players in the power forward performance better than the center. In error, Due to the large number of new players used in the Chinese men's basketball team at this Olympic Games, the mental quality and lack of experience in the competition have led to many errors on the part of the inside team members, which are much higher than the other teams in the same group. The internal team members of the world's outstanding teams have participated in a wide range of basic offensive tactical personnel. There are many attack points, and the basic cooperation between the outside and the inner line members is relatively tacit and smooth. The attack point where the inside line members of the Chinese men's basketball team participate in the basic cooperation of offensive tactics is too single. Rely too much on Yi Jianlian as a point of attack. The new insiders and the old outside players have a low degree of tacit understanding. The cooperation is not smooth enough. 3. From the observation of video recording and the statistics on the basic cooperation of various offensive tactics, we can see that the Chinese men's basketball inline players have a strong sense of basic cooperation in offensive tactics. The inside line players are breaking through the ball. The Chinese men's basketball players have their own advantages over their opponents in terms of the attacking effect of passing and cutting ball and the match of strategy. 4. The Chinese men's basketball inline players choose the right time to cover the ball in the basic cooperation of offensive tactics. The selection of the position of ball cover and the choice of direction without ball cover are insufficient, the ability of direct attack is not strong after cutting into the center of tangent, and the inside line members of the world basketball team cooperate with the overall development trend in the offensive tactics foundation. The frequency and proportion of sudden and tangent cooperation increased, and the combination of various kinds of cooperation increased, especially other cooperation and cover cooperation, and the number of times of response was reduced accordingly, and the rhythm of response was accelerated. In form there is a tendency to converge to tangent coordination.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都體育學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G841

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何少鈞;我國甲A男籃內(nèi)線防守現(xiàn)狀與方法的研究[J];福建體育科技;2004年04期

2 馬濤;;籃球從防守外線過渡到防守內(nèi)線的技術(shù)及方法[J];十堰職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

3 陳國慰;對籃球內(nèi)線隊(duì)員投籃方式的探討[J];武漢體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1990年02期

4 王居堂;王新維;;近籃區(qū)內(nèi)線強(qiáng)攻初探[J];哈爾濱體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1991年04期

5 宋旭;;如何提高籃球運(yùn)動(dòng)員內(nèi)線強(qiáng)攻能力[J];吉林體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年02期

6 宋旭;析籃球運(yùn)動(dòng)員內(nèi)線強(qiáng)攻能力的提高[J];四川體育科學(xué);1998年01期

7 韋紹華;;試論籃球運(yùn)動(dòng)員內(nèi)線強(qiáng)攻能力的提高[J];體育世界(學(xué)術(shù)版);2011年06期

8 彭勇;論籃球內(nèi)線隊(duì)員對籃球比賽的影響[J];泰安師專學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

9 黃越;吳亞婷;王鋒斌;;亞洲男籃內(nèi)線技戰(zhàn)術(shù)發(fā)展新特征——以26屆亞洲男籃錦標(biāo)賽為例[J];搏擊(體育論壇);2014年06期

10 許文彬;籃球賽中內(nèi)線隊(duì)員搶位初探[J];上海體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1981年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 崔魯祥;郭永波;張戈;;第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)男籃比賽國內(nèi)外內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻技術(shù)特點(diǎn)的研究[A];自主創(chuàng)新與持續(xù)增長第十一屆中國科協(xié)年會(huì)論文集（3）[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 張衛(wèi)平;教你打籃球[N];中國體育報(bào);2000年

2 江蘇省 何光周;國家男籃的六大問題[N];中國體育報(bào);2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 光暉;山西興瑞女籃技戰(zhàn)術(shù)特征分析[D];山西大學(xué);2014年

2 仝菲;中外優(yōu)秀內(nèi)線隊(duì)員持球貼身進(jìn)攻技術(shù)運(yùn)用特征對比研究[D];天津體育學(xué)院;2015年

3 郭新宇;第31屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國男籃和對手內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合的運(yùn)用研究[D];首都體育學(xué)院;2017年

4 莫其呂;第31屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國男籃與前四名球隊(duì)內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻方式的比較研究[D];首都體育學(xué)院;2017年

5 張聯(lián)泉;第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中、外女籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻特點(diǎn)比較研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

6 李星;第三十屆倫敦奧運(yùn)會(huì)中外男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻能力的比較研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2013年

7 陳杰;第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻“位置模糊”特征的研究[D];首都體育學(xué)院;2014年

8 張彥;對第26屆男籃亞錦賽中、外內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻能力的比較分析[D];山西大學(xué);2012年

9 吳書衡;對第16屆男籃世錦賽中外男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員攻防能力的對比研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

10 裴江湖;中外男籃內(nèi)線隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻能力的對比分析[D];福建師范大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1652806