本文選題：男子網(wǎng)球　切入點(diǎn)：男子單打　出處：《寧波大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2015年,德約科維奇、費(fèi)德勒、穆雷、瓦林卡ATP排名前四球員獲得了四大滿貫比賽中的所有冠軍,代表男子網(wǎng)壇的最高水平。在網(wǎng)球比賽中,戰(zhàn)勝對手奪取勝利的因素很多,這些球員靠什么技術(shù)得分戰(zhàn)勝對手,靠什么奪取勝利,成為網(wǎng)球比賽中的關(guān)鍵問題,也成為教練和運(yùn)動員關(guān)注的問題。本研究咨詢國內(nèi)網(wǎng)球?qū)＜?知名教練,選取2015年ATP年終排名前四位球員與排名第六至十五位球員在四大滿貫中全部24場比賽中一發(fā)得分、二發(fā)得分、接一發(fā)得分、接二發(fā)得分、第三拍得分、正手得分、反手得分、截?fù)舻梅�、高壓得分、切削得分、放小球得分、特殊擊球得分技術(shù)作為研究對象,觀看球員比賽視頻,利用SPSS19.0軟件進(jìn)行描述性統(tǒng)計與分析,對排名前四球員與排名第六至十五名球員各項得分技術(shù)平均數(shù)進(jìn)行T檢驗(yàn),判定雙方在各項技術(shù)得分是否有顯著性差異,并對前四名與六至十五名球員各項得分技術(shù)進(jìn)行相關(guān)性分析,并運(yùn)用判別函數(shù)分析中的逐步判別分析找出前四球員制勝得分技術(shù),得出以下結(jié)論:(1)前四名球員在一發(fā)得分、二發(fā)得分、接一發(fā)得分、接二發(fā)得分、第三拍得分、正手得分、反手得分、截?fù)舻梅�、高壓得分、切削得分、放小球得分、總得�?2項技術(shù)得分上平均值都要高出六至十五名球員;兩組球員一發(fā)、第三拍、正手、反手得分皆要高出其他技術(shù)得分,其中正手得分要高于反手得分,這說明當(dāng)今網(wǎng)壇男子職業(yè)球員比賽依靠一發(fā)和底線正/反手得分,這對我國網(wǎng)球青少年球員日常訓(xùn)練有極大意義。(2)前四名球員與六至十五名球員在反手得分和特殊擊球得分兩項技術(shù)存在顯著性差異,在一發(fā)得分、接一發(fā)得分、第三拍得分、正手得分四項技術(shù)存在非常顯著性差異,在二發(fā)得分、接一發(fā)得分、接二發(fā)得分、截?fù)舻梅�、高壓得分、切削得分、放小球得分六項得分技術(shù)上無顯著性差異。(3)前四球員與六至十五名球員在反手得分和正手得分,接二發(fā)得分與二發(fā)得分,正手得分與第三拍得分呈現(xiàn)中度相關(guān),在第三拍得分與接一發(fā)得分,第三拍得分與接二發(fā)得分,反手得分與第三拍得分,截?fù)舻梅峙c接二發(fā)得分,切削得分與截?fù)舻梅譃榈投认嚓P(guān),特殊球得分與第三拍得分為低度負(fù)相關(guān)。(4)一發(fā)得分技術(shù),接一發(fā)得分技術(shù),第三拍得分技術(shù)這三項得分技術(shù)是所有十二項得分技術(shù)中前四名球員與六至十五名球員區(qū)別勝負(fù)關(guān)系影響最大的得分技術(shù),即是本研究的要找的制勝得分技術(shù)。
[Abstract]:In 2015, Djokovic, Roger Federer, Murray, and Valinka ATP's top four players won all four Grand Slam titles, representing the highest level in men's tennis. What technical points these players use to win over their opponents and how to win a victory has become a key issue in the tennis match, as well as a concern for coaches and athletes. This study consults domestic tennis experts and famous coaches. In 2015, ATP ranked the top four players and ranked 6th to 15 players in all 24 matches in the four Grand Slam. They scored one, two, one, then two, third, forehand, backhand. Volley score, high pressure score, cutting score, small ball score, special batting score technology as the research object, watching the player game video, using SPSS19.0 software for descriptive statistics and analysis, T-test was performed on the technical average of each score between the top four players and the 6th to 15 players to determine whether there were significant differences in the technical scores between the two sides. The correlation analysis between the top four players and the six to 15 players' scoring techniques is carried out, and by using the stepwise discriminant analysis in the discriminant function analysis, the winning scoring technique of the first four players is found, and the following conclusions are drawn: 1) the first four players score in the first round. Two, one, two, third, forehand, backhand, volley, high-pressure, cutting, small ball, The total scores of 12 techniques were higher than the average of six to 15 players; the players in both groups scored higher than other techniques in one shot, the third shot, the forehand, and the backhand, and the forehand scored higher than the backhand, and the score of the forehand was higher than that of the backhand, and the score of the forehand was higher than that of the backhand. This shows that men's professional players in the tennis world today rely on first and bottom forward / backhand scoring. This is of great significance to the daily training of tennis teenagers in our country.) there are significant differences between the first four players and six to 15 players in backhand scoring and special batting scoring. There is a very significant difference in forehand scoring between the four techniques: second, second, second, intercept, high pressure, cutting, The first four players and six to 15 players scored in backhand and forehand, followed by second and second shots. The forehand score was moderately correlated with the third shot score. In the third shot and the second shot, the third shot and the second shot, the backhand score and the third shot score, the intercept score and the second shot score, the cutting score and the volley score were low, The score of the special ball and the score of the third shot are low negative correlation. The third beat scoring technique is the most influential scoring technique in all 12 scoring techniques, which is the first four players and six to 15 players, which is the winning scoring technique to be found in this study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G845

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘晟,王全法,翁彥康;如何欣賞高水平網(wǎng)球比賽[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(工科版);2002年06期

2 金雁;父母對子女網(wǎng)球之路的重要作用和如何培養(yǎng)孩子的幾點(diǎn)建議[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報;2003年03期

3 ;網(wǎng)球[J];軟件導(dǎo)刊;2004年03期

4 張偉;合理運(yùn)用網(wǎng)球比賽分析法[J];體育科技文獻(xiàn)通報;2005年07期

5 郭國兵;;業(yè)余網(wǎng)球愛好者在網(wǎng)球比賽中常見弱點(diǎn)分析[J];運(yùn)城學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年05期

6 張偉;網(wǎng)球比賽中的"隊長"[J];體育科技文獻(xiàn)通報;2005年01期

7 關(guān)學(xué)雷;;對我國網(wǎng)球市場發(fā)展的分析[J];渤海大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2006年03期

8 朱征宇;譚冬平;陳祺;;中國競技網(wǎng)球發(fā)展面臨瓶頸問題的研究[J];廣州體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年05期

9 李華;肖平;;網(wǎng)球文化與大學(xué)生思想道德教育[J];吉林體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年04期

10 梁高亮;劉軼;;關(guān)于中國網(wǎng)球文化的一些思考[J];西北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2007年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 郭道義;;萬里的網(wǎng)球、橋牌之緣[A];百家談養(yǎng)生[C];2009年

2 陸樹兵;;淺談上海高校校園網(wǎng)球文化的培植[A];第二十一屆全國高校田徑科研論文報告會論文專輯[C];2011年

3 汪燁;;網(wǎng)球規(guī)則的演變趨勢[A];2013年全國競技體育科學(xué)論文報告會論文摘要集[C];2013年

4 吳松偉;;從生物力學(xué)的角度分析網(wǎng)球深淺球技術(shù)[A];2011高等職業(yè)教育電子信息類專業(yè)學(xué)術(shù)暨教學(xué)研討會論文集[C];2011年

5 陳海琦;金昌龍;;網(wǎng)球比賽中接發(fā)球的選擇[A];第九屆全國體育科學(xué)大會論文摘要匯編(3)[C];2011年

6 王釗;戶子悅;;影響網(wǎng)球步法的因素及練習(xí)方法[A];第十六屆全國運(yùn)動生物力學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)交流大會（CABS 2013）論文集[C];2013年

7 梁成軍;;網(wǎng)球技戰(zhàn)術(shù)粗糙集數(shù)據(jù)挖掘決策支持研究[A];2013年全國競技體育科學(xué)論文報告會論文摘要集[C];2013年

8 張智;馮青山;;國內(nèi)職業(yè)女單網(wǎng)球選手的國際競爭力研究[A];第二十三屆全國高校田徑科研論文報告會論文專輯[C];2013年

9 張欣然;隗金水;潘t，

本文編號：1607071