本文選題：間歇訓練　切入點：持續(xù)訓練　出處：《體育科學》2017年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的:比較大強度間歇訓練(High-intensity Interval Training,HIT)和中等強度持續(xù)訓練(Moderate-intensity Continuous Training,MCT)對斜坡測試(Ramp)、中等強度及高強度持續(xù)運動中耗氧量動力學(OUK,Oxygen Uptake Kinetics)等參數的影響。方法:36名青年男性受試者分為高強度間歇訓練組(HIT)、中等強度持續(xù)訓練組(MCT,)和對照組(NOT),MCT和HIT兩干預組分別進行6周、每周3次強度不同而訓練量相同的運動干預;各組干預前(Pre)、中(Mid)、后(Post)分別進行Ramp力竭測試及中、高強度持續(xù)運動的OUK測試。結果:6周干預后,HIT與MCT兩干預組VO_2max/kg(最大耗氧量)、VO_2-VAT(通氣無氧閾耗氧量)、VO_2/kg-VAT(通氣無氧閾耗氧量相對值)、Waat-VAT(通氣無氧閾功率)均表現(xiàn)為干預后值高于干預前(P0.05)、干預中值(P0.01);3組受試者之間上述參數組間差異顯著(P0.05),但僅表現(xiàn)HIT、MCT組與NOT組之間差異顯著,HIT與MCT兩組之間差異不顯著(P0.05);A_(slop)(Delta效率)、A_(OUES)(耗氧效率坡度)組間效應不顯著(P0.05)。中等強度下OUK各參數僅有τ(Tau,OUK時間常數)值組間效應顯著(F=3.652,P=0.040.05),HIT與MCT兩干預組分別與NOT之間組間效應顯著(HIT vs NOT,P=0.0270.05;MCT vs NOT,P=0.0270.05),但HIT、MCT兩干預組Mid、Post階段,組間差異不顯著(P0.05),各組各時間點TD值、A值組間差異不顯著(P0.05)。大強度運動時A1(A,耗氧幅度)值組間效應顯著(F=4.439,P=0.0110.05),除了MCT及HIT分別與NOT組組間差異顯著外,HIT與MCT之間差異顯著(P0.05),6周后HIT組A1值顯著高于同階段MCT組(1 893.9±132.1vs 1 632.3±340.0,P0.05);而對于觀測值τ_1,3組受試者之間組間效應顯著(F=9.083,P0.01),MIT及HIT組和NOT組相比,τ_1顯著降低,并且MIT和HIT組間差異顯著(P0.05);3周后HIT組τ_1值已經顯著高于NOT組(Mid:42.5±3.8 vs 53.7±4.3,P0.01),而MCT在6周后出現(xiàn)(Post:43.1±4.6 vs 53.4±6.0,P0.01)。3周后HIT組A2值比NOT組顯著減低(P0.05),6周后Post值顯著低于MCT組及NOT組同階段值(P0.01),而MCT組在各階段與NOT組之間差異不顯著(P0.05)。τ_2雖有所升高,但并無顯著意義(P0.05)。結論:大強度間歇訓練和中等強度持續(xù)訓練均可提高VO_2max、VAT等心肺耐力評定參數,但兩種訓練模式對上述參數改善并無顯著區(qū)別;兩訓練模式對中等強度下耗氧動力參數影響無顯著區(qū)別,但大強度間歇訓練在提高大強度運動過程中氧耗應答速率及減少耗氧量慢成分方面有著更明顯的優(yōu)勢。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the effects of high intensity Interval training with high intensity interval training and moderate intensity continuous training moderate-intensity Continuous training on the parameters of slope test, oxygen consumption dynamics in medium intensity and high intensity continuous exercise. Methods: 36 young men were employed in this study. The subjects were divided into two groups: the high intensity intermittent training group, the moderate intensity continuous training group and the control group for 6 weeks, respectively. Exercise intervention with different intensity and same amount of training was conducted three times a week. Ramp exhaustion tests were performed before and after intervention in each group. OUK test of high intensity continuous exercise. Results after 6 weeks of intervention, the two intervention groups, hit and MCT, had 2max / kg VAT (maximal oxygen consumption / VAT / VAT / VAT / VAT = 2 / kg / kg / VAT.Results the relative value of VAT (relative value of anaerobic threshold oxygen consumption / VAT) was shown as the value after intervention (VAT). It was higher than that before intervention (P 0.05). The difference of the above parameters among the three groups was significant (P 0.05), but only the difference between HITMCT group and NOT group was not significant. There was no significant difference between Hit and MCT group and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Under moderate intensity, the OUK parameters were only 蟿 Taut OUK time constant. The effect between the two intervention groups was significant. The effect between the two intervention groups and NOT was significant, and the effect was significant between the two intervention groups and NOT, but the midpost phase of the two intervention groups was Hit and not P0. 027. 05 MCT vs nitrite P0. 027 0. 05, but the midpost phase of the two intervention groups with HITT MCT was significantly higher than that of the other two intervention groups (P < 0. 05 or 0. 05%), but there was no significant difference in the midpost phase between the two intervention groups, and the difference between the two intervention groups was observed. There was no significant difference among groups (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference in TD value and A value among groups at different time points. There was a significant difference between group A and MCT in high intensity exercise. There was a significant difference between MCT and MCT in addition to the difference between NOT and MCT. After 6 weeks, the A1 value of HIT group was significantly higher than that of MCT group at the same stage (1 893.9 鹵132.1 vs 1 632.3 鹵340.0 P0.05), while 蟿 1 was significantly lower than that of HIT group and NOT group. After 3 weeks, the 蟿 1 value of HIT group was significantly higher than that of NOT group mid: 42.5 鹵3.8 vs 53.7 鹵4.3 P0.01a, while the A2 value of HIT group was significantly lower than that of NOT group after 6 weeks. The Post value of HIT group was significantly lower than that of MCT group and NOT group at the same stage. However, there was no significant difference between MCT group and NOT group. Conclusion: both high-intensity intermittent training and moderate intensity continuous training can improve cardiopulmonary endurance assessment parameters such as VO _ 2max.VAT, but there is no significant difference between the two training modes in improving the above parameters. There is no significant difference between the two training modes on the dynamic parameters of oxygen consumption at moderate intensity, but the intermittent training with high intensity has more obvious advantages in increasing the response rate of oxygen consumption and reducing the slow component of oxygen consumption in the process of high intensity exercise.
【作者單位】： 華僑大學體育學院;華僑大學體育與健康科學研究中心;北京第二外國語學院體育部;國家體育總局秦皇島訓練基地;
【基金】：華僑大學中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務費資助項目(13SKGCQT14) 國家體育總局重點研究領域攻關課題(2012B067)
【分類號】：G808.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 胡國鵬;馮魏;馮剛;王振;劉無逸;孟妍;;不同運動模式下耗氧量動力特征參數關系研究[J];體育科學;2015年11期

2 黎涌明;;高強度間歇訓練對不同訓練人群的應用效果[J];體育科學;2015年08期

3 王京京;張海峰;;高強度間歇訓練運動處方健身效果研究進展[J];中國運動醫(yī)學雜志;2013年03期

4 陳小平;;有氧與無氧耐力的動態(tài)關系及其對當前我國耐力訓練的啟示[J];體育科學;2010年04期

5 胡國鵬;王人衛(wèi);;運動中攝氧量動力學的多相理論與生理機理[J];首都體育學院學報;2009年06期

6 陳小平;;我國耐力訓練存在的主要問題——對訓練強度失衡的反思[J];武漢體育學院學報;2008年04期

7 胡國鵬,劉無逸,向劍鋒;最大耗氧量速度運動時的生理負荷分析及意義[J];體育科學;2005年08期

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 趙紅勤;;高強度間歇運動對女大學生抑郁情緒的作用研究[J];聊城大學學報(自然科學版);2017年01期

2 胡國鵬;鄭陽;孟妍;馮剛;馮魏;;大強度間歇訓練與中等強度持續(xù)訓練對耗氧量動力學特征影響的比較研究[J];體育科學;2017年03期

3 趙悅;;“HIIT”訓練法在體育中考教學中運用的分析與思考[J];文體用品與科技;2017年06期

4 賀業(yè)恒;趙超;苗延禧;;4周高強度間歇性訓練對青少年競走運動員運動能力的影響[J];遼寧體育科技;2017年01期

5 欒正陽;;基于知識圖譜的國際高強度間歇訓練研究可視化分析[J];哈爾濱體育學院學報;2017年01期

6 劉一陽;李慶;;我國優(yōu)秀男子健美運動員體能評價模型構建及現(xiàn)狀研究[J];北京體育大學學報;2017年01期

7 曹潔;李曉婷;徐馳;韓哲;;8周HIIT對男子賽艇公開級運動員血紅蛋白和身體成分影響的研究[J];湖北體育科技;2017年01期

8 趙悅;;我國成年人體脂肪率與血壓的關系分析[J];文體用品與科技;2016年24期

9 高艷;顏士斌;;間歇訓練理論在女子摔跤訓練中的價值研究[J];運動;2016年22期

10 韓子鵬;敖國政;吉長東;;一種可穿戴快速運動強度檢測方法研究[J];中國體育科技;2016年06期

【二級參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 黎涌明;毛承;;競技體育項目的專項供能比例——亟待糾正的錯誤[J];體育科學;2014年10期

2 黎涌明;紀曉楠;資薇;;人體運動的本質[J];體育科學;2014年02期

3 陳小平;褚云芳;;田徑運動訓練經典理論與方法的演變與發(fā)展[J];體育科學;2013年04期

4 王京京;張海峰;;高強度間歇訓練運動處方健身效果研究進展[J];中國運動醫(yī)學雜志;2013年03期

5 胡國鵬;王人衛(wèi);;運動中攝氧量動力學的多相理論與生理機理[J];首都體育學院學報;2009年06期

6 陳小平;;我國耐力訓練存在的主要問題——對訓練強度失衡的反思[J];武漢體育學院學報;2008年04期

7 向劍鋒,劉無逸;最大攝氧量速度研究進展(綜述)[J];體育科研;2004年01期

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 劉曉海;;大強度間歇訓練對男子運動員400m全速跑血乳酸的影響[J];軍事體育進修學院學報;2009年01期

2 馬繼政;牛潔;;大強度間歇訓練心肌細胞分子適應機制[J];體育科技文獻通報;2010年03期

3 溫莊;;大強度間歇訓練與血乳酸度濃變化的研究[J];湖北體育科技;1990年02期

4 RichardRoss;左琳;于沛;;400米跑的專門訓練[J];學校體育;1991年03期

5 耿海軍;趙其林;;大強度間歇訓練對耐力成績的影響[J];少年體育訓練;2003年02期

6 季麗萍,馮照軍;間歇性訓練和持續(xù)性訓練對大鼠腓腸肌ATP酶活性的影響[J];體育與科學;2004年01期

7 季麗萍,馮照軍;不同訓練方法對大鼠腎臟組織Na~+,K~+-ATP酶活性及自由基代謝的影響[J];天津體育學院學報;2005年03期

8 ;[J];;年期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 張旭;短時間大強度間歇訓練對肥胖青年女性腹部脂肪的影響[D];河北師范大學;2016年

2 王冠棟;大強度間歇游泳運動對膳食誘導肥胖大鼠肥胖及炎癥因子的影響[D];河南大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1567718