發(fā)布時間：2018-02-27 21:29

  本文關鍵詞： 競技體育后備人才 中長期規(guī)劃 評價指標與標準　出處：《首都體育學院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：為使我國奧運項目競技體育事業(yè)實現(xiàn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展,擴大和提高奧運項目競技體育后備人才的規(guī)模和質量,國家體育總局于2014年11月頒布了《奧運項目競技體育后備人才培養(yǎng)中長期規(guī)劃(2014-2024)》(以下簡稱《規(guī)劃》。為使《規(guī)劃》的落實工作取得良好效果,針對《規(guī)劃》的實施情況建立一套科學合理的評價指標體系是非常有必要的。本文以《奧運項目競技體育后備人才培養(yǎng)中長期規(guī)劃(2014-2024)》為研究對象,以文獻資料法、問卷調查法、德爾菲法、專家訪談法、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計分析法、邏輯分析法為主要研究方法針對《規(guī)劃》的實施情況構建了一套科學合理的評價體系,以期來更好的落實國家體育總局頒布的《規(guī)劃》。研究結果如下:1.通過查閱參考文獻和對相關領域專家進行訪談,了解到我國當前在奧運項目競技體育領域的后備人才現(xiàn)狀無論是在規(guī)模上還是質量上與之前相比較都呈現(xiàn)出一定的下滑趨勢,究其原因就是隨著我國國情的改變,之前的后備人才培養(yǎng)模式已經(jīng)與時代脫節(jié),隱藏的問題和缺陷逐漸暴露出來。為了改變這一現(xiàn)狀,國家體育總局出臺了一系列文件,以2014年頒發(fā)的《規(guī)劃》為主,為了促使《規(guī)劃》的內容得到確切的落實,總局決定階段性的對各個管理中心關于《規(guī)劃》的落實工作進行評估。2.本次問卷調查的形式采用“德爾菲法”對專家進行重復調查,通過專家在此領域的研究結論和豐富的工作經(jīng)驗來對備選指標進行評判,幫助我們構建《規(guī)劃》實施情況的評價指標體系,以期讓國家體育總局采用這套評價工具對各個項目管理中心關于《規(guī)劃》的落實工作進行階段性的考核與評估。3.本次研究所構建的《規(guī)劃》實施情況評價指標體系包括一級指標六個:訓練體系、競賽體系、保障體系、組織體系、管理機制、特色項目,二級指標十七個:地方布局、梯隊結構、基地建設、科學選材、科學訓練、競賽制度、成績目標、政策保障、隊伍保障、經(jīng)費保障、普及推廣、組織機構、運動員文化教育、評價機制、督導機制、激勵機制、特色項目(具體含義)。并且根據(jù)專家對每個指標的打分賦值,計算出了指標的權重系數(shù)。4.建立了評價標準與細則,且針對奧運項目競技體育后備人才培養(yǎng)工作的特點選取了科學合理的評估方法(模糊綜合評估法)對各個項目管理中心關于《規(guī)劃》的落實工作進行考核,為更好的落實《規(guī)劃》起到導向性作用。
[Abstract]:In order to realize the sustainable development of the Olympic sports in China, and to expand and improve the scale and quality of the reserve talents of the Olympic sports, In November 2014, the State General Administration of Sports promulgated the "medium and long term Plan for the training of competitive Sports talents in Olympic events" (hereinafter referred to as "the Plan"). In order to achieve good results in the implementation of the "Plan", It is very necessary to set up a set of scientific and reasonable evaluation index system for the implementation of "Planning". This paper takes "medium and long term Planning for the training of competitive Sports talents in Olympic events" as the research object, takes the method of literature data and questionnaire survey as the research object. Delphi method, expert interview method, mathematical statistics analysis method and logic analysis method are the main research methods to build a scientific and reasonable evaluation system for the implementation of "Planning". In order to better implement the Plan promulgated by the State Sports Administration, the research results are as follows: 1.By consulting references and interviewing experts in related fields, We have learned that the current situation of reserve talents in the field of competitive sports in the Olympic Games has shown a certain downward trend both in terms of scale and quality, and the reason is that with the change of our country's national conditions, The former reserve talent training model has been out of touch with the times, and hidden problems and defects have been gradually exposed. In order to change this situation, the State Sports Administration has issued a series of documents, mainly the "Plan" issued in 2014. In order to ensure that the contents of the "plan" are precisely implemented, the General Administration has decided to periodically evaluate the implementation of the "plan" in various management centers. The form of this questionnaire survey is repeated investigation of experts by the Delphi method. Through the experts' research conclusions in this field and rich work experience to judge the alternative indicators, it helps us to build the evaluation index system of the implementation of "Planning". With a view to let the State General Administration of Sports use this set of evaluation tools for the implementation of the project management center on the implementation of the stage assessment and evaluation .3.The Institute constructed the implementation of the "Planning" evaluation index body. The Department includes six first-level indicators: the training system, Competition system, security system, organization system, management mechanism, characteristic project, secondary index 17: local layout, echelon structure, base construction, scientific selection, scientific training, competition system, achievement goal, policy guarantee, Team security, funding guarantee, popularization, organization, athlete culture and education, evaluation mechanism, supervision mechanism, incentive mechanism, characteristic item (specific meaning). The weight coefficient of the index is calculated. 4. The evaluation criteria and rules are established. According to the characteristics of the training of reserve talents in Olympic sports, a scientific and reasonable evaluation method (fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method) is selected to assess the implementation of "planning" in each project management center. In order to better implement the "plan" play a leading role.
【學位授予單位】：首都體育學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G812

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陽藝武;呂萬剛;鄭偉濤;;我國競技體育后備人才培養(yǎng)現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展評價[J];上海體育學院學報;2015年03期

2 王守恒;都娟;宮魯鳴;殷學鋒;王新華;張學領;靳勇;李明;申長庚;張景海;曹燕飛;張珂;劉長喜;劉長軍;李勇嘯;;我國籃球項目競技體育后備人才培養(yǎng)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略思考[J];首都體育學院學報;2013年06期

3 郭太瑋;潘紹偉;季瀏;;基于德爾菲法篩選大學體育課程內容標準的具體指標[J];體育學刊;2012年02期

4 朱昆;趙丙軍;王興;;我國競技體育后備人才培養(yǎng)研究熱點及演進路徑[J];上海體育學院學報;2011年06期

5 王向宏;李野鵬;;我國競技體育后備人才培養(yǎng)的發(fā)展方向[J];首都體育學院學報;2011年05期

6 王春枝;斯琴;;德爾菲法中的數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計處理方法及其應用研究[J];內蒙古財經(jīng)學院學報(綜合版);2011年04期

7 胡小明;;從“體教結合”到“分享運動”——探索競技運動后備人才培養(yǎng)的新路徑[J];體育科學;2011年06期

8 鐘澤;;新時期我國競技體育評價指標體系的構建[J];沈陽體育學院學報;2010年01期

9 潘前;陳偉霖;吳友凱;;對新時期我國競技體育后備人才培養(yǎng)體制改革的思考[J];首都體育學院學報;2007年02期

10 陳頗;殷櫻;夏崇德;;我國競技體育可持續(xù)發(fā)展的評價指標與評價體系的構建[J];首都體育學院學報;2007年02期

，

本文編號：1544440