本文關(guān)鍵詞： 肥胖 腰圍 體脂率 脂肪含量 心血管疾病風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子　出處：《上海體育學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：研究目的:肥胖的流行,已成為一個(gè)公共的健康問題。腰圍已經(jīng)被許多研究證實(shí)是反映人體腹部脂肪和健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子的有效指標(biāo)。但目前利用腰圍來診斷肥胖尚無統(tǒng)一的測(cè)量方法及診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。本研究選取五處常用的腰圍測(cè)量點(diǎn)分別測(cè)量我國成年人的腰圍,比較不同測(cè)量部位的腰圍之間是否存在差異,分析不同部位的腰圍與腹部脂肪含量及全身脂肪含量的相關(guān)性,探討腰圍對(duì)心血管疾病風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子的影響,從而找出最適合中國人的腰圍測(cè)量方法,為界定中國人肥胖的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)提供科學(xué)支持,使研究者和健康從業(yè)者能更有效的診斷肥胖,進(jìn)而對(duì)其進(jìn)行預(yù)防及治療。研究方法:本研究共招募213名18—35歲的中國成年人作為受試者,其中男性107名,女性106名。本研究選取了五個(gè)常用的腰圍測(cè)量點(diǎn):(1)髂嵴的上緣(WC1);(2)第十二肋下緣(WC2);(3)髂嵴上緣與第十二肋下緣連線的中點(diǎn)(WC3);(4)肚臍上緣1 cm;(5)腰最細(xì)的部位。雙能X線骨密度儀用于測(cè)量受試者的全身脂肪質(zhì)量,全身體脂率,腹部脂肪質(zhì)量和腹部體脂率。心血管疾病風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子包括空腹血糖(FBP)、甘油三酯(TG)、總膽固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白膽固醇(HDL-C)和低密度脂蛋白膽固醇(LDL-C)。所有數(shù)據(jù)均以平均數(shù)和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差的方式表示,應(yīng)用SPSS 20.0統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析。重復(fù)性方差測(cè)量用于比較不同性別不同測(cè)量部位的腰圍之間是否存在差異;Pearson相關(guān)性分析用于確定腰圍與全身脂肪含量或腹部脂肪之間的相關(guān)性;二元邏輯回歸用于探討腰圍對(duì)心血管疾病風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子的影響。統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異定為P0.05。研究結(jié)果:女性五個(gè)部位的腰圍均存在顯著性差異,表現(xiàn)為:WC5WC2WC3WC4WC1(P0.001)。男性除了WC5和WC2之間不存在顯著性差異外,其余部位的腰圍之間均存在顯著性的差異,表現(xiàn)為:WC5、WC2WC4WC3WC1(P0.001);男性五個(gè)部位的腰圍與全身脂肪質(zhì)量(r=0.867~0.914,P0.001)和腹部脂肪質(zhì)量(r=0.880~0.923,P0.001)之間呈極強(qiáng)相關(guān),與全身體脂率(r=0.720~0.781,P0.001)和腹部體脂率(r=0.635~0.698,P0.001)之間呈強(qiáng)相關(guān);女性五個(gè)部位的腰圍與全身脂肪質(zhì)量(r=0.782~0.844,P0.001),腹部脂肪質(zhì)量(r=0.678~0.740,P0.001)和腹部體脂率(r=0.627~0.671,P0.001)之間呈較強(qiáng)的相關(guān)性,和全身體脂率(r=0.570~0.633,P0.001)之間中等程度相關(guān);男性WC3對(duì)心血管疾病危險(xiǎn)因子的影響具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,為危險(xiǎn)因素。研究結(jié)論:中國成年人不同腰圍測(cè)量方法測(cè)量出的腰圍值不同,五個(gè)部位的腰圍是不可替換的。五個(gè)部位的腰圍與全身脂肪質(zhì)量,全身體脂率,腹部脂肪質(zhì)量和腹部體脂率都具有顯著的相關(guān)性。男性WC3為心血管疾病危險(xiǎn)因子的危險(xiǎn)因素。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the prevalence of obesity. Waist circumference has been proved to be an effective indicator of abdominal fat and health risk factors. However, there is no uniform measurement method and diagnosis of obesity using waist circumference. Standard. This study selected five commonly used waist measurement points to measure the waist circumference of Chinese adults. To compare the differences of waist circumference between different measuring sites, to analyze the correlation between waist circumference and abdominal fat content and body fat content, and to explore the influence of waist circumference on cardiovascular disease risk factors. In order to find out the most suitable for the Chinese waistline measurement for the definition of Chinese obesity standards to provide scientific support so that researchers and health practitioners can more effectively diagnose obesity. Methods: a total of 213 Chinese adults aged 18-35 years were recruited as subjects, including 107 males. 106 women. In this study, we selected five commonly used waist circumference measurement points: 1) the upper margin of iliac crest, WC1; (2) WC2 (12th); (3) the midpoint of the line between the superior margin of iliac crest and the inferior margin of 12th ribs. The upper margin of navel was 1 cm; Double energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure the body fat mass and body fat rate of the subjects. Abdominal fat mass and abdominal body fat rate. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease included fasting blood glucose (FBPN), triglyceride (TGG), total cholesterol (TC). High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). All data were expressed as average and standard deviation. Statistical software SPSS 20.0 was used to analyze the difference of waist circumference between different sex and different parts of the body, and repeated variance measurement was used to compare whether there were differences in waist circumference. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between waist circumference and body fat content or abdominal fat. Binary logistic regression was used to study the influence of waist circumference on risk factors of cardiovascular disease. The statistical difference was P0.05.Results: there were significant differences in waist circumference of five parts of women. The results were as follows: WC5WC2WC3WC4WC1P 0.001. except for WC5 and WC2, there was no significant difference in waist circumference between male and male. WC5, WC2WC4WC3WC1, P0.001; The waist circumference and body fat weight of the five parts of the male were 0.914 P0.001) and the abdominal fat weight was 0.880 ~ 0.923. There was a strong correlation between P0.001 and total body fat rate (r = 0.720 / 0.781g / P 0.001) and abdominal body fat rate (r = 0.635 / 0. 698). P0.001); The waist circumference and body fat weight of the five parts of the female were 0.782U 0.844m P 0.001g, and the abdominal fat weight was 0.6780.7040. There was a strong correlation between P0.001) and abdominal body fat rate (0.671P 0.001), and there was a strong correlation with the whole body fat rate (r = 0.570 ~ 0.633). P0.001); The influence of male WC3 on cardiovascular disease risk factors is statistically significant. Conclusion: the waist circumference values measured by different waist circumference measurement methods in Chinese adults are different. The waist circumference of five parts is irreplaceable. The waist circumference of five parts is related to the mass of whole body fat and the ratio of body fat to body fat. There was a significant correlation between abdominal fat mass and abdominal body fat rate. Male WC3 was a risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海體育學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G804.49

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 孫洪罡;王來生;;基于通徑分析的應(yīng)急管理風(fēng)險(xiǎn)監(jiān)控和預(yù)防法[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

2 景婷;;中國股票市場(chǎng)多因素定價(jià)模型研究與實(shí)證分析[J];新疆職業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 姜蓓蕾;劉恒;耿雷華;李愛花;陳煉鋼;黃昌碩;;南水北調(diào)東線工程運(yùn)行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子識(shí)別初探[A];中國水利學(xué)會(huì)2008學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集（下冊(cè)）[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 記者 劉海英;科學(xué)家確認(rèn)新的精神病遺傳風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子[N];科技日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

2 湖北省武漢市食品藥品監(jiān)督管理局東湖分局 羅志;病從口入的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子在哪里？[N];中國醫(yī)藥報(bào);2012年

3 記者 李禾;PM2.5污染成我國第四大致死風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子[N];科技日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 錢一鶴;債券風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的定價(jià)、分解和控制[D];浙江大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 孫海云;基于安全鏈條的高鐵運(yùn)營過程安全風(fēng)險(xiǎn)識(shí)別及預(yù)警研究[D];大連交通大學(xué);2015年

2 張林鳳;股票風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的關(guān)聯(lián)性研究[D];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

3 馬桂花;湖南省手足口病時(shí)空分布及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2016年

4 陸樂;非對(duì)稱性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與橫截面收益[D];浙江大學(xué);2017年

5 張欣然;花生中真菌毒素風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子排序方法的研究與應(yīng)用[D];湖北大學(xué);2016年

6 楊超然;中國成年人不同腰圍測(cè)量方法與身體脂肪含量及心血管風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子的相關(guān)性分析[D];上海體育學(xué)院;2017年

7 宋瓊;多狀態(tài)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子下的死亡率模型在壽險(xiǎn)中的應(yīng)用[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年

8 沈佳翔;上市公司管理舞弊重要風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子研究[D];杭州電子科技大學(xué);2013年

9 王瑋瑾;系統(tǒng)性和非系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子對(duì)公司債券信用價(jià)差的影響程度研究[D];浙江財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院;2013年

10 羅艷;IT項(xiàng)目外包風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因子識(shí)別研究[D];中南大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1485137