本文關(guān)鍵詞：籃球球隊風格量化評價模型的建立和應(yīng)用研究　出處：《太原理工大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 籃球 球隊風格 量化評價 模型 應(yīng)用研究

【摘要】：本文通過對籃球球隊風格模型的量化為目標,從目前關(guān)于籃球球隊風格的存在的問題入手,以第十四屆CUBA男子十六強比賽數(shù)據(jù)為研究對象。運用文獻資料法、專家訪談法等研究方法,確定模型體系的理論基礎(chǔ),同時借助統(tǒng)計學中的因子分析構(gòu)建量化評價球隊風格模型、并以球隊為樣本建立與比賽勝負相關(guān)的logistic回歸進行實證研究,實現(xiàn)以不同球隊為著眼點風格模型的定性與定量評價,為全面的了解一支球隊提供了一種全新的視角。主要結(jié)論如下： 1、通過探索性因子分析法建立指標體系。結(jié)果顯示：籃球球隊風格量化評價可以從F1(進攻實力)、F2(進攻節(jié)奏)、F3(防守效果)、F4(防守質(zhì)量)、F5(進攻選擇)五個維度進行分析。 2、通過logical回歸模型分析,在模型的擬合優(yōu)度的檢驗中,太原理工大學球隊五個緯度對于球隊勝負貢獻度為：F1(1.3131)F3(0.9407)F4(0.8840)F2(0.2788)F5(0.1813),浙江大學的貢獻度為：F1(0.9157)F3(0.8991)F4(0.8211)F5(0.3351)F2(0.0428)。在模型的擬合優(yōu)度的檢驗中,太原理工大學和浙江大學的檢驗結(jié)果分別為：Likelihood Ratio的為17.14、14.8898,P值為0.()()42、0.0211均小于0.05。表示所選因素指標能夠很好的解釋變量。 3、將模型5個維度因素對球隊勝利的影響程度進行公式處理,量化的指標的雷達圖比較顯示：兩支球隊風格模型存在差異,進一步通過數(shù)據(jù)比較的深入研究可知,在F1、F3、F5維度上差異明顯,F2、F4維度差異較小。 4、文獻理論研究中，，影響球隊形成的因素有：運動員的特質(zhì)、明星球員的作用、教練員的作用、球隊管理特點、賽制的相對變化、球隊的相互競爭、籃球發(fā)展的趨勢等七個方面。
[Abstract]:This article through the basketball team style model quantification as the goal, starts with the present existence question about the basketball team style. Taking the data of the 14th CUBA men's 16 strong competition as the object of study, the theoretical basis of the model system is determined by using the methods of literature, expert interview and other research methods. At the same time, using factor analysis in statistics to build a quantitative evaluation of team style model, and take the team as a sample to establish a logistic regression related to the game to conduct empirical research. The qualitative and quantitative evaluation of different teams' style models provides a new perspective for a comprehensive understanding of a team. The main conclusions are as follows: 1. The index system was established by exploratory factor analysis. The results showed that the quantitative evaluation of basketball team style could be made from F1 (offensive strength) (offensive rhythm / F3). The five dimensions of F 4 (defensive quality) and F 5 (attack selection) were analyzed. 2, through the logical regression model analysis, in the model goodness of fit test. The contribution of the five latitudes of Taiyuan University of Technology to the team's victory and loss is 1: F1, 1.3131, F3, 0.9407, F4, 0.8840, F2, 0.2788, F5 (. 0.1813). The contribution of Zhejiang University is as follows: F1: 0. 9157, F3: 0. 899 1, F4, 0. 8211, F5, 0. 3351, F2, 0. 0428). In the test of the goodness of fit of the model. The test results of Taiyuan University of Science and Technology and Zhejiang University were 17.14 ~ 14.8898P = 17.14 ~ 14.889 ~ (8) ~ (42), respectively. 0.0211 is less than 0.05, indicating that the selected factor indicators can explain the variables well. 3. The influence degree of the five dimension factors of the model on the victory of the team is dealt with by formula. The comparison of the radar images of the quantitative indexes shows that there are differences between the two teams' style models. Through the further study of data comparison, we can see that the difference in F1F3F5 dimension is obvious and F2F4 dimension is smaller. 4. In the research of literature theory, the factors that influence the formation of the team are: the characteristics of players, the role of star players, the role of coaches, the characteristics of team management, the relative changes of competition system, and the competition between teams. Basketball development trend and other seven aspects.
【學位授予單位】：太原理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G841

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 史丹;張棟;;扣籃技術(shù)在比賽中的作用和運用[J];教育教學論壇;2011年28期

2 劉建業(yè);馬莉;;影響籃球運動員防守能力的因素及對策分析[J];內(nèi)江科技;2013年01期

3 徐素華;;2005-2006賽季CBA聯(lián)賽技術(shù)統(tǒng)計分析[J];科協(xié)論壇(下半月);2007年07期

4 楊樺;論籃球運動的本質(zhì)、特征及規(guī)律[J];成都體育學院學報;2001年04期

5 劉建和;;“知識”——運動技術(shù)研究新的理論增長點[J];成都體育學院學報;2006年05期

6 舒剛民;;籃球運動起源與本質(zhì)的再研究[J];成都體育學院學報;2011年05期

7 劉毅;;第16屆亞運會女子籃球比賽各球隊技術(shù)指標體系的應(yīng)用分析[J];山東體育科技;2011年02期

8 王家宏;李燕領(lǐng);;中國競技籃球運動風格發(fā)展的反思與把握[J];上海體育學院學報;2009年06期

9 黃政;田俊松;;對現(xiàn)代籃球防守技戰(zhàn)術(shù)體系的研究[J];山西師大體育學院學報;2008年S2期

10 張大中;王海波;楊劍;;我國籃球教練員勝任特征的特點分析[J];沈陽體育學院學報;2008年05期

本文編號：1404497