本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國(guó)職業(yè)籃球聯(lián)賽的反壟斷法律規(guī)制　出處：《河北大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 職業(yè)籃球聯(lián)賽 行政壟斷 反壟斷法 法律規(guī)制

【摘要】：我國(guó)《反壟斷法》自2008年8月1日生效實(shí)施以來,經(jīng)過八年時(shí)間的實(shí)踐,逐步暴露出了一些問題。值得注意的是隨著我國(guó)體育產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展,職業(yè)體育的興起,職業(yè)體育領(lǐng)域出現(xiàn)了壟斷現(xiàn)象,其中的行政壟斷行為已經(jīng)成為我國(guó)職業(yè)體育進(jìn)一步發(fā)展的絆腳石,特別是在我國(guó)職業(yè)籃球聯(lián)賽中,行政壟斷行為限制了體育聯(lián)賽各俱樂部之間的有效公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng),但是由于我國(guó)體育產(chǎn)業(yè)的國(guó)情,《反壟斷法》直接適用于我國(guó)職業(yè)籃球聯(lián)賽存在著諸多的困難。職業(yè)體育在世界范圍內(nèi)有巨大的影響力,參與人數(shù)越來越多。特別是在我國(guó),隨著足球、籃球等運(yùn)動(dòng)的職業(yè)化改革不斷深入,體育產(chǎn)業(yè)已經(jīng)成為國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的重要組成部分。職業(yè)籃球聯(lián)賽是市場(chǎng)化的產(chǎn)物,在各國(guó)呈現(xiàn)出不同的特點(diǎn),也不可避免的存在壟斷行為。在我國(guó)職業(yè)籃球聯(lián)賽中,壟斷行為主表現(xiàn)為控制俱樂部準(zhǔn)入、限制運(yùn)動(dòng)員的具體薪金、限制運(yùn)動(dòng)員自由流動(dòng),控制俱樂部的買賣方面。由于我國(guó)體育競(jìng)技的背景,這些壟斷行為具有很強(qiáng)的行政屬性,屬于行政壟斷,對(duì)聯(lián)賽本身造成了嚴(yán)重的不利影響。眾所周知,美國(guó)在運(yùn)用反壟斷法規(guī)制職業(yè)體育方面有成功的經(jīng)驗(yàn),通過利用“合理分析原則”和“關(guān)鍵設(shè)施理論”對(duì)各種壟斷行為進(jìn)行詳盡的分析,以實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)壟斷行為的規(guī)制。我國(guó)《反壟斷法》在規(guī)制職業(yè)體育方面尚不成熟,借鑒美國(guó)的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)?zāi)軌蚋玫陌l(fā)揮其對(duì)市場(chǎng)的規(guī)范作用,保護(hù)經(jīng)營(yíng)者消費(fèi)者的合法權(quán)益。我國(guó)職業(yè)籃球聯(lián)賽應(yīng)當(dāng)適用《反壟斷法》,同時(shí)考慮到職業(yè)體育的特殊性,應(yīng)當(dāng)建立與我國(guó)職業(yè)體育相適應(yīng)的反壟斷法豁免制度,對(duì)聯(lián)賽中所必要的基本制度在反壟斷法上予以豁免,如準(zhǔn)入制度,工資帽制度等。此外還要進(jìn)一步完善我國(guó)反壟斷法的私人執(zhí)行制度,以更好的保護(hù)消費(fèi)者的利益。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the anti-monopoly law in August 1, 2008, after eight years of practice, some problems have been exposed gradually. It is worth noting that with the development of China's sports industry, the rise of sports occupation, occupation sports appeared in the field of monopoly, the administrative monopoly has become a stumbling block to the further development of occupation sports in China, especially in the Chinese occupation basketball league, administrative monopoly restrict the effective and fair competition between Sports League clubs however, due to China's sports industry conditions, "directly applicable to our country occupation basketball league there are many difficulties in anti-monopoly law". Professional sports have great influence in the world and more and more people participate. Especially in China, the sports industry has become an important part of the national economy with the deepening of the professional reform of football and basketball. The professional basketball league is the product of the market, and there are different characteristics in various countries, and there are unavoidable monopolies. In our professional basketball league matches, monopolistic behaviors are mainly to control Club access, restrict athletes' specific salaries, restrict free flow of athletes, and control the business of clubs. Because of the background of China's sports competition, these monopolies have strong administrative attributes, and they belong to administrative monopoly, which have caused serious adverse effects on the League itself. As we all know, the United States has successful experience in the regulation of professional sports through the use of anti-monopoly law. Through the use of the "reasonable analysis principle" and "critical facilities theory", we conduct a detailed analysis of various monopolistic behaviors in order to achieve the regulation of monopoly behavior. China's anti-monopoly law is not mature in regulating professional sports. Drawing on the successful experience of the United States, we can better play its normative role in the market and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the operators and consumers. Chinese occupation basketball league should apply the "anti-monopoly law" at the same time, considering the particularity of sports occupation, occupation and sports of our country should be established to adapt to the exemption system of anti-monopoly law, the basic system of competition necessary antithetical couplet exemption in anti-monopoly law, such as access system, salary cap system etc.. In addition, we should further improve the private enforcement system of China's antitrust law so as to better protect the interests of consumers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294;G841
，

本文編號(hào)：1341624