本文關(guān)鍵詞：CBA2013-2014賽季新疆廣匯隊(duì)總決賽失利原因分析　出處：《成都體育學(xué)院》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： CBA 新疆 北京 籃球 技戰(zhàn)術(shù)

【摘要】：中國(guó)男子籃球職業(yè)籃球聯(lián)賽(即CBA)經(jīng)歷了接近二十年的發(fā)展,聯(lián)賽競(jìng)技水平逐年提高,出現(xiàn)過(guò)八一隊(duì)七次獲得總冠軍、廣東宏遠(yuǎn)七次蟬聯(lián)總冠軍,2010-11賽季后,北京隊(duì)進(jìn)行重組,兩次獲得聯(lián)賽總冠軍。而CBA各隊(duì)中,新疆廣匯隊(duì)一直是奪冠大熱門,卻屢屢與冠軍失之交臂。運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)資料法、影像觀察法、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)法、對(duì)比分析法以CBA2013-2014賽季總決賽新疆廣匯隊(duì)與北京金隅隊(duì)6場(chǎng)比賽為研究對(duì)象,通過(guò)兩支球隊(duì)各項(xiàng)數(shù)據(jù)的對(duì)比分析,探討新疆隊(duì)失利的原因。得出以下結(jié)論:1、新疆隊(duì)組織后衛(wèi)以及前鋒球員能力差是新疆隊(duì)本次總冠軍爭(zhēng)奪戰(zhàn)失利的重要原因。2、教練員方面,新疆隊(duì)教練員在執(zhí)教年限、運(yùn)動(dòng)經(jīng)歷以及臨場(chǎng)指揮方面與北京隊(duì)教練員存在一定差異。新疆隊(duì)有效暫停比北京隊(duì)多,但是進(jìn)攻端有效暫停得分比北京隊(duì)少。防守端失分情況比北京隊(duì)嚴(yán)重。換人方面,新疆隊(duì)換人次數(shù)多。換人2分鐘內(nèi),替補(bǔ)隊(duì)員得分北京隊(duì)較好于新疆隊(duì)。3、得分能力方面,新疆隊(duì)2分球命中率和罰球命中率均低于北京隊(duì)。新疆隊(duì)在比賽中助攻得分少、失誤多;北京隊(duì)更為注重對(duì)搶斷、蓋帽等技術(shù)的運(yùn)用。拼搶籃板球方面,兩隊(duì)均注重后場(chǎng)籃板球的拼搶,新疆隊(duì)更為注重對(duì)前場(chǎng)籃板球的拼搶,但二次進(jìn)攻的成功率較低;在拼搶人數(shù)上,新疆隊(duì)略占優(yōu)勢(shì)。4、得分方式上,2分球得分方式中,兩隊(duì)均以運(yùn)球突破上籃為主要得分方式,但北京隊(duì)技術(shù)運(yùn)用更為合理,命中率高的技術(shù)運(yùn)用更多。3分球得分方式中,兩隊(duì)均以接傳球原地跳投為主,新疆隊(duì)技術(shù)運(yùn)用更合理,命中率更高。5、得分區(qū)域方面,2分球得分區(qū)域中,兩隊(duì)均注重限制區(qū)內(nèi)得分,但北京隊(duì)限制區(qū)外3分線內(nèi)得分更多,得分區(qū)域分布更合理。3分球得分區(qū)域中,均注重弧頂和兩側(cè)45度角投籃區(qū)域的得分,新疆隊(duì)較好于北京隊(duì)。6、戰(zhàn)術(shù)配合方面,進(jìn)攻端,新疆隊(duì)個(gè)人進(jìn)攻次數(shù)少但個(gè)人進(jìn)攻成功率較高。進(jìn)攻基礎(chǔ)配合中,北京隊(duì)配合次數(shù)少但成功率較高。進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)中,北京隊(duì)進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用更合理,能夠有效破壞新疆隊(duì)的防守戰(zhàn)術(shù),獲得得分。防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)配合方面,北京隊(duì)基礎(chǔ)配合比新疆隊(duì)合理,成功率較高。防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)中,北京隊(duì)能夠有效遏制新疆隊(duì)的主要進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù),在一定程度上左右比賽的勝負(fù)。
[Abstract]:Chinese basketball occupation basketball league (CBA) has experienced nearly twenty years of development, athletics level increased year by year, there have been seven times the Bayi team won the championship, the Guangdong tigers won the seven championship, 2010-11 season, Beijing team won two league restructuring championship. In the CBA teams, the Xinjiang Guanghui team has always been the most popular champion, but it has repeatedly been lost with the champion. By using the methods of documentation, image observation, mathematical statistics and contrastive analysis, taking the 6 matches of Xinjiang Guanghui team and Beijing Jinyu team in the CBA2013-2014 season finals as the research object, the reasons for the defeat of Xinjiang team were discussed through the comparative analysis of the data of two teams. The following conclusions are drawn: 1. The poor ability of the Xinjiang team to organize the guard and the forward players is an important reason for the defeat of the Xinjiang team. 2, coaches, the coaches of Xinjiang team in teaching years, sports experience and the command of the Beijing team, there are certain differences with the coaches of the team. The Xinjiang team effectively suspended more than the Beijing team, but the attack side effectively suspended the score less than the Beijing team. The defensive end up worse than the Beijing team. In the exchange of people, the Xinjiang team changed a lot. Within 2 minutes of the replacement, the substitutes scored better in Beijing than the Xinjiang team. 3, scoring ability, Xinjiang team 2 points hit rate and penalty shot hit rate are lower than the Beijing team. Xinjiang team has fewer assists and more mistakes in the competition, and the Beijing team pays more attention to the application of the technology of the steals, the cap and so on. The rebound, the two teams are on the defensive rebound and play the Xinjiang team to pay more attention to the offensive rebound fighting, but the two attack success rate is low; in Pinqiang number, Xinjiang team a slight advantage. 4, scoring way, 2 points scoring way, both teams are dribbling breakthrough layup as the main scoring way, but Beijing team technology is more reasonable, high hit technology application more. In the way of scoring 3 points, both teams are the main jumpers in place of passing the ball, and the Xinjiang team has more reasonable technical use and higher hit rate. 5, scoring area, 2 teams scored in the scoring area, both teams all focused on the restricted zone score, but Beijing scored 3 more points outside the restricted area, and the score area distribution was more reasonable. 3 points in the scoring area, both focus on the arc and both sides of the 45 - degree corner shooting area, Xinjiang team is better than the Beijing team. 6, the tactical coordination, the offensive end, the Xinjiang team has fewer individual attacks but the individual attack success rate is high. In the basic coordination of the attack, Beijing team has fewer times of coordination but has a high success rate. In the offensive tactics, the offensive tactics of the Beijing team are more reasonable, which can effectively destroy the defensive tactics of the Xinjiang team and get the score. Defensive tactics match, Beijing team's basic coordination is more reasonable than Xinjiang team, and the success rate is high. In defense tactics, the Beijing team can effectively curb the main offensive tactics of the Xinjiang team, to a certain extent the victory or defeat of the game.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：成都體育學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G841

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 薛原;苦心·慧眼·鐵腕——新疆廣匯隊(duì)主教練蔣興權(quán)訪談錄[J];籃球;2003年04期

2 ;新疆廣匯隊(duì) 西北籃球的旗幟[J];當(dāng)代體育;2004年20期

3 林茵;;對(duì)CBA2009-2010賽季廣東隊(duì)與新疆隊(duì)總決賽攻防技戰(zhàn)術(shù)的比較分析[J];體育成人教育學(xué)刊;2010年06期

4 小馬;CBA鏈接[J];籃球;2004年04期

5 持練當(dāng)空舞;;再議官秀昌事件[J];籃球俱樂部;2008年05期

6 ;克隆坊[J];當(dāng)代體育;2011年10期

7 晴空;;CBA何去何從[J];體育博覽;2008年02期

8 ;官秀昌:CBA“壞小子”[J];法律與生活;2008年03期

9 陳巖;蔣興權(quán):站不動(dòng)了就回家養(yǎng)老[J];新體育;2003年08期

10 馬冰封;甲B,往日不同今時(shí)[J];籃球;2001年15期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前8條

1 專欄撰稿人 郝洪山;熱愛籃球的理由[N];新疆日?qǐng)?bào)(漢);2013年

2 袁f^;維護(hù)體育精神[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

3 ;CBA聯(lián)賽新疆保持主場(chǎng)不敗 廣東取得十一連勝[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

4 記者 梁希儀　賈文軍;CBA曝丑聞,球員觀眾亂作一團(tuán)[N];新華每日電訊;2010年

5 記者 王洋;北京金隅男籃再奪CBA總冠軍[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

6 記者 王洋;北京男籃再度問鼎總冠軍[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

7 本報(bào)實(shí)習(xí)記者 張品;擁有內(nèi)線才能續(xù)寫神話[N];中國(guó)體育報(bào);2007年

8 本報(bào)記者 薛原;籃球熱潮涌邊城[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 楊博;CBA2013-2014賽季新疆廣匯隊(duì)總決賽失利原因分析[D];成都體育學(xué)院;2015年

2 林清虹;2010-2011賽季CBA總決賽廣東隊(duì)獲勝因素的分析[D];成都體育學(xué)院;2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1338320