本文關鍵詞：CBA2013-2014賽季新疆廣匯隊總決賽失利原因分析　出處：《成都體育學院》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： CBA 新疆 北京 籃球 技戰(zhàn)術

【摘要】：中國男子籃球職業(yè)籃球聯賽(即CBA)經歷了接近二十年的發(fā)展,聯賽競技水平逐年提高,出現過八一隊七次獲得總冠軍、廣東宏遠七次蟬聯總冠軍,2010-11賽季后,北京隊進行重組,兩次獲得聯賽總冠軍。而CBA各隊中,新疆廣匯隊一直是奪冠大熱門,卻屢屢與冠軍失之交臂。運用文獻資料法、影像觀察法、數理統計法、對比分析法以CBA2013-2014賽季總決賽新疆廣匯隊與北京金隅隊6場比賽為研究對象,通過兩支球隊各項數據的對比分析,探討新疆隊失利的原因。得出以下結論:1、新疆隊組織后衛(wèi)以及前鋒球員能力差是新疆隊本次總冠軍爭奪戰(zhàn)失利的重要原因。2、教練員方面,新疆隊教練員在執(zhí)教年限、運動經歷以及臨場指揮方面與北京隊教練員存在一定差異。新疆隊有效暫停比北京隊多,但是進攻端有效暫停得分比北京隊少。防守端失分情況比北京隊嚴重。換人方面,新疆隊換人次數多。換人2分鐘內,替補隊員得分北京隊較好于新疆隊。3、得分能力方面,新疆隊2分球命中率和罰球命中率均低于北京隊。新疆隊在比賽中助攻得分少、失誤多;北京隊更為注重對搶斷、蓋帽等技術的運用。拼搶籃板球方面,兩隊均注重后場籃板球的拼搶,新疆隊更為注重對前場籃板球的拼搶,但二次進攻的成功率較低;在拼搶人數上,新疆隊略占優(yōu)勢。4、得分方式上,2分球得分方式中,兩隊均以運球突破上籃為主要得分方式,但北京隊技術運用更為合理,命中率高的技術運用更多。3分球得分方式中,兩隊均以接傳球原地跳投為主,新疆隊技術運用更合理,命中率更高。5、得分區(qū)域方面,2分球得分區(qū)域中,兩隊均注重限制區(qū)內得分,但北京隊限制區(qū)外3分線內得分更多,得分區(qū)域分布更合理。3分球得分區(qū)域中,均注重弧頂和兩側45度角投籃區(qū)域的得分,新疆隊較好于北京隊。6、戰(zhàn)術配合方面,進攻端,新疆隊個人進攻次數少但個人進攻成功率較高。進攻基礎配合中,北京隊配合次數少但成功率較高。進攻戰(zhàn)術中,北京隊進攻戰(zhàn)術運用更合理,能夠有效破壞新疆隊的防守戰(zhàn)術,獲得得分。防守戰(zhàn)術配合方面,北京隊基礎配合比新疆隊合理,成功率較高。防守戰(zhàn)術中,北京隊能夠有效遏制新疆隊的主要進攻戰(zhàn)術,在一定程度上左右比賽的勝負。
[Abstract]:Chinese basketball occupation basketball league (CBA) has experienced nearly twenty years of development, athletics level increased year by year, there have been seven times the Bayi team won the championship, the Guangdong tigers won the seven championship, 2010-11 season, Beijing team won two league restructuring championship. In the CBA teams, the Xinjiang Guanghui team has always been the most popular champion, but it has repeatedly been lost with the champion. By using the methods of documentation, image observation, mathematical statistics and contrastive analysis, taking the 6 matches of Xinjiang Guanghui team and Beijing Jinyu team in the CBA2013-2014 season finals as the research object, the reasons for the defeat of Xinjiang team were discussed through the comparative analysis of the data of two teams. The following conclusions are drawn: 1. The poor ability of the Xinjiang team to organize the guard and the forward players is an important reason for the defeat of the Xinjiang team. 2, coaches, the coaches of Xinjiang team in teaching years, sports experience and the command of the Beijing team, there are certain differences with the coaches of the team. The Xinjiang team effectively suspended more than the Beijing team, but the attack side effectively suspended the score less than the Beijing team. The defensive end up worse than the Beijing team. In the exchange of people, the Xinjiang team changed a lot. Within 2 minutes of the replacement, the substitutes scored better in Beijing than the Xinjiang team. 3, scoring ability, Xinjiang team 2 points hit rate and penalty shot hit rate are lower than the Beijing team. Xinjiang team has fewer assists and more mistakes in the competition, and the Beijing team pays more attention to the application of the technology of the steals, the cap and so on. The rebound, the two teams are on the defensive rebound and play the Xinjiang team to pay more attention to the offensive rebound fighting, but the two attack success rate is low; in Pinqiang number, Xinjiang team a slight advantage. 4, scoring way, 2 points scoring way, both teams are dribbling breakthrough layup as the main scoring way, but Beijing team technology is more reasonable, high hit technology application more. In the way of scoring 3 points, both teams are the main jumpers in place of passing the ball, and the Xinjiang team has more reasonable technical use and higher hit rate. 5, scoring area, 2 teams scored in the scoring area, both teams all focused on the restricted zone score, but Beijing scored 3 more points outside the restricted area, and the score area distribution was more reasonable. 3 points in the scoring area, both focus on the arc and both sides of the 45 - degree corner shooting area, Xinjiang team is better than the Beijing team. 6, the tactical coordination, the offensive end, the Xinjiang team has fewer individual attacks but the individual attack success rate is high. In the basic coordination of the attack, Beijing team has fewer times of coordination but has a high success rate. In the offensive tactics, the offensive tactics of the Beijing team are more reasonable, which can effectively destroy the defensive tactics of the Xinjiang team and get the score. Defensive tactics match, Beijing team's basic coordination is more reasonable than Xinjiang team, and the success rate is high. In defense tactics, the Beijing team can effectively curb the main offensive tactics of the Xinjiang team, to a certain extent the victory or defeat of the game.
【學位授予單位】：成都體育學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G841

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 薛原;苦心·慧眼·鐵腕——新疆廣匯隊主教練蔣興權訪談錄[J];籃球;2003年04期

2 ;新疆廣匯隊 西北籃球的旗幟[J];當代體育;2004年20期

3 林茵;;對CBA2009-2010賽季廣東隊與新疆隊總決賽攻防技戰(zhàn)術的比較分析[J];體育成人教育學刊;2010年06期

4 小馬;CBA鏈接[J];籃球;2004年04期

5 持練當空舞;;再議官秀昌事件[J];籃球俱樂部;2008年05期

6 ;克隆坊[J];當代體育;2011年10期

7 晴空;;CBA何去何從[J];體育博覽;2008年02期

8 ;官秀昌:CBA“壞小子”[J];法律與生活;2008年03期

9 陳巖;蔣興權:站不動了就回家養(yǎng)老[J];新體育;2003年08期

10 馬冰封;甲B,往日不同今時[J];籃球;2001年15期

相關重要報紙文章 前8條

1 專欄撰稿人 郝洪山;熱愛籃球的理由[N];新疆日報(漢);2013年

2 袁f^;維護體育精神[N];人民日報;2008年

3 ;CBA聯賽新疆保持主場不敗 廣東取得十一連勝[N];人民日報;2009年

4 記者 梁希儀　賈文軍;CBA曝丑聞,球員觀眾亂作一團[N];新華每日電訊;2010年

5 記者 王洋;北京金隅男籃再奪CBA總冠軍[N];北京日報;2014年

6 記者 王洋;北京男籃再度問鼎總冠軍[N];北京日報;2014年

7 本報實習記者 張品;擁有內線才能續(xù)寫神話[N];中國體育報;2007年

8 本報記者 薛原;籃球熱潮涌邊城[N];人民日報;2003年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 楊博;CBA2013-2014賽季新疆廣匯隊總決賽失利原因分析[D];成都體育學院;2015年

2 林清虹;2010-2011賽季CBA總決賽廣東隊獲勝因素的分析[D];成都體育學院;2012年

，

本文編號：1338320