終身學(xué)習(xí)立交橋建構(gòu)的國際發(fā)展和比較分析
本文關(guān)鍵詞:終身學(xué)習(xí)立交橋建構(gòu)的國際發(fā)展和比較分析 出處:《中國遠(yuǎn)程教育》2013年09期 論文類型:期刊論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 終身學(xué)習(xí)立交橋 資歷框架 質(zhì)量保證機(jī)制 國際教育比較
【摘要】:世界各國都致力于發(fā)展各級各類教育銜接和溝通的終身學(xué)習(xí)體系,國際上稱為資歷框架,我國稱為終身學(xué)習(xí)立交橋。本文采用文獻(xiàn)分析和比較研究的方法,描述資歷框架的國際發(fā)展并進(jìn)行比較分析,主要分為五個(gè)部分:第一部分描述終身學(xué)習(xí)立交橋和資歷框架的含義;第二部分分析國際上資歷框架的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,包括全球大約150個(gè)國家和地區(qū)已經(jīng)建立和正在建立的資歷框架,以及跨國和跨地區(qū)資歷框架的發(fā)展;第三部分選擇七個(gè)國家和地區(qū)作為樣本,比較建立資歷框架中的關(guān)鍵要素,包括資歷框架的立法和管理的比較、資歷級別和能力標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的比較、資歷質(zhì)量保證和評審機(jī)制的比較、成效為本、學(xué)分累積和轉(zhuǎn)換、以及過往資歷認(rèn)可的比較;第四部分是討論,作者提出資歷框架發(fā)展的三階段說,資歷框架建設(shè)的國際化視野、多方合作、質(zhì)量保證和其他關(guān)鍵因素;最后一個(gè)部分是本文的結(jié)論。作者希望,世界各國建立資歷框架的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和教訓(xùn),能夠?qū)ξ覈K身學(xué)習(xí)立交橋的建構(gòu)具有一定的借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:In the second part , the author puts forward three stages of the development of the Chinese calendar framework , including the comparison of the legislation and management of the Chinese calendar frame , the comparison between the qualification grade and the competence standard , the comparison between the qualification grade and the competence standard , the comparison of the qualifications quality assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison between the qualification grade and the competence standard , the comparison between the qualification grade and the competence standard , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualifications quality assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualifications quality assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification quality assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the qualification assurance and the evaluation mechanism , the comparison of the
【作者單位】: 香港大學(xué)專業(yè)進(jìn)修學(xué)院持續(xù)教育及終身學(xué)習(xí)研究中心;
【分類號】:G720
【正文快照】: 一、終身學(xué)習(xí)立交橋和資歷框架的含義構(gòu)建各級各類教育銜接和溝通的終身學(xué)習(xí)體系,是當(dāng)前全球教育發(fā)展的重心和趨勢,許多國家都在努力發(fā)展一個(gè)地區(qū)、一個(gè)國家甚至跨國互認(rèn)的終身學(xué)習(xí)立交橋體系。我國政府也在《國家中長期教育改革和發(fā)展規(guī)劃綱要(2010-2020年)》中明確提出構(gòu)建
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 閆忠仁;淺談為教學(xué)管理人員應(yīng)制定的工作標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化報(bào)道;1995年03期
2 周祥瑜;呂紅;;澳大利亞職業(yè)教育的培訓(xùn)包體系及其優(yōu)勢[J];中國職業(yè)技術(shù)教育;2006年12期
3 李邢西;;成人高等教育發(fā)展存在的問題與展望[J];教育與職業(yè);2010年35期
4 梅偉惠;高等教育自學(xué)考試質(zhì)量保證機(jī)制研究[J];開放教育研究;2005年05期
5 徐輝富;;建立基于“學(xué)”的遠(yuǎn)程教育質(zhì)量保證框架——ICDE質(zhì)量評審的啟發(fā)和思考[J];中國遠(yuǎn)程教育;2009年04期
6 王振洪;應(yīng)永祥;;市場競爭語境下的成人高等教育質(zhì)量保證[J];教育發(fā)展研究;2008年Z3期
7 汪偉,GillYoung,DiMarks-Maran;建構(gòu)主義理論與開放教育中的質(zhì)量保證機(jī)制:一項(xiàng)個(gè)案研究[J];開放教育研究;1999年06期
8 陳信;徐輝富;;高等教育的質(zhì)量保證:評審與評估——兼論上海電大的ICDE質(zhì)量評審[J];開放教育研究;2008年04期
9 秦紅;;歐盟終身指導(dǎo)新進(jìn)展及其挑戰(zhàn)[J];職教通訊;2010年12期
10 王正東;;英國遠(yuǎn)程開放教育質(zhì)量保證制度的文化透視[J];遠(yuǎn)程教育雜志;2011年05期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條
1 嚴(yán)利敏;完善學(xué)習(xí)價(jià)值鏈[N];工人日報(bào);2007年
2 嚴(yán)利敏;如何設(shè)計(jì)開發(fā)或選擇培訓(xùn)課程[N];工人日報(bào);2007年
3 吉林省農(nóng)業(yè)委員會(huì) 李學(xué)勤;加強(qiáng)農(nóng)業(yè)職業(yè)技能開發(fā) 建設(shè)農(nóng)村實(shí)用人才隊(duì)伍[N];農(nóng)民日報(bào);2006年
4 駐站記者 馬旭明;寧城縣創(chuàng)新式培訓(xùn)教育使參訓(xùn)人員獲益多多[N];赤峰日報(bào);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 梁明;面向終身學(xué)習(xí)的能力導(dǎo)向個(gè)性化推薦系統(tǒng)中資源的建設(shè)與共享機(jī)制研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2011年
2 劉紅霞;終身學(xué)習(xí)個(gè)性化推薦系統(tǒng)中學(xué)習(xí)者個(gè)人能力發(fā)展研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2011年
3 張丹;能力導(dǎo)向的終身學(xué)習(xí)個(gè)性化學(xué)習(xí)路徑的構(gòu)建研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2011年
4 崔曉杰;我國高等職業(yè)學(xué)院職業(yè)培訓(xùn)問題研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號:1367406
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/tsjy/1367406.html