本文選題：研究性學(xué)習(xí) + 評價體系��； 參考：《揚州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)今世界經(jīng)濟迅速發(fā)展,各種高新科技層出不窮,思考如何培養(yǎng)出具有創(chuàng)新能力、適應(yīng)社會經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的新一代高質(zhì)量人才成為當(dāng)前高校的當(dāng)務(wù)之急,高校教學(xué)質(zhì)量直接關(guān)系到國家命運和學(xué)生發(fā)展。為此,教育部相繼發(fā)布了文件,明確指出要調(diào)整當(dāng)前高校人才培養(yǎng)計劃,努力提高大學(xué)生的學(xué)習(xí)能力、創(chuàng)新能力、實踐能力、交流能力和社會適應(yīng)能力。研究性學(xué)習(xí)作為全新的學(xué)習(xí)理念進入高校教學(xué)中,帶給高校的不只是學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)方式的變革,而是教學(xué)理念、教學(xué)質(zhì)量的根本變革。研究性學(xué)習(xí)評價是研究性學(xué)習(xí)的重要組成部分,直接影響著研究性學(xué)習(xí)質(zhì)量和高校教學(xué)質(zhì)量改革工程的實施。本研究分析了研究性學(xué)習(xí)在高校教學(xué)質(zhì)量改革工程大環(huán)境中的重要性,針對當(dāng)前研究性學(xué)習(xí)評價的實際情況與不足,開展了本次研究。 文章共分五章： 第一章引言部分,該章節(jié)介紹了本課題產(chǎn)生的背景、所需研究的問題、研究的目標(biāo)、內(nèi)容以及研究方法、思路等內(nèi)容。 第二章為文獻綜述,本章節(jié)系統(tǒng)梳理了研究性學(xué)習(xí)、學(xué)習(xí)評價以及研究性學(xué)習(xí)評價的理論知識,具體表現(xiàn)為對研究性學(xué)習(xí)的發(fā)展、內(nèi)涵、學(xué)習(xí)評價的相關(guān)概念和研究性學(xué)習(xí)評價的理念、方法的理論梳理,并簡單闡明當(dāng)前研究性學(xué)習(xí)評價研究現(xiàn)狀,為下文評價體系的架構(gòu)與實施奠定理論基礎(chǔ)。 第三章是對高校研究性學(xué)習(xí)體系的架構(gòu),該部分以高校研究性學(xué)習(xí)培養(yǎng)目標(biāo)為基礎(chǔ),吸收了建構(gòu)主義、多元智能和后現(xiàn)代主義教學(xué)評價觀,分析了高校學(xué)生的特點,從結(jié)果、過程和表現(xiàn)三種角度架構(gòu)起高校研究性學(xué)習(xí)評價體系。 第四章實證研究階段,本章將第三章中設(shè)計的評價體系運用于實踐中,以期檢驗評價體系的有效性,發(fā)現(xiàn)評價體系中存在的問題,完善該評價體系。 第五章總結(jié)與展望。本文在最后對研究成果進行了總結(jié),并從三個方向展望未來的研究。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the world economy and the emergence of various high and new technologies, it is imperative for colleges and universities to think about how to cultivate a new generation of high-quality people with innovative ability to adapt to the development of social economy. The quality of teaching in colleges and universities is directly related to the fate of the country and the development of students. Therefore, the Ministry of Education has issued documents one after another, clearly pointing out that it is necessary to adjust the current talent training plan in colleges and universities, and strive to improve the students' learning ability, innovation ability, practical ability, communication ability and social adaptation ability. As a new learning concept, research learning has brought not only the change of students' learning style, but also the fundamental change of teaching idea and teaching quality. The evaluation of inquiry learning is an important part of inquiry learning, which directly affects the implementation of the reform project of research learning quality and teaching quality in colleges and universities. This study analyzes the importance of research learning in the environment of teaching quality reform engineering in colleges and universities, and carries out this study in view of the actual situation and shortcomings of the current evaluation of research learning. The article is divided into five chapters: the first chapter introduces the background of the subject, the need to study the problem, research objectives, content, research methods, ideas and so on. The second chapter is a literature review. This chapter systematically combs the theoretical knowledge of research learning, learning evaluation and research learning evaluation, which shows the development and connotation of research learning. The related concepts of learning evaluation and the concepts and methods of inquiry learning evaluation are combed in theory, and the current research status of research learning evaluation is briefly expounded, which lays a theoretical foundation for the structure and implementation of the evaluation system below. The third chapter is the structure of the research learning system in colleges and universities, which is based on the cultivation goal of research learning in colleges and universities, absorbing constructivism, multiple intelligences and postmodernism teaching evaluation, analyzing the characteristics of college students, and analyzing the results. The evaluation system of research learning in colleges and universities is constructed from the three angles of process and performance. In the fourth chapter, the evaluation system designed in the third chapter is applied to practice in order to test the effectiveness of the evaluation system, find out the existing problems in the evaluation system, and perfect the evaluation system. Chapter five summarizes and prospects. At the end of this paper, the research results are summarized, and the future research is prospected from three directions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G642.0

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳小鴻;黃亞平;;關(guān)于高校研究性教學(xué)若干問題的理性思考[J];長春工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(高教研究版);2007年01期

2 石彤;;開放式研究性學(xué)習(xí)評價指標(biāo)體系設(shè)計[J];出國與就業(yè)(就業(yè)版);2011年15期

3 曾廣錄;;論研究性教學(xué)改革中的評價機制建設(shè)[J];當(dāng)代教育理論與實踐;2012年04期

4 葉秀丹;;我國“研究性學(xué)習(xí)”的研究綜述[J];大慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年04期

5 周光禮;朱家德;;重建教學(xué):我國“研究性學(xué)習(xí)”三十年述評[J];高等工程教育研究;2009年02期

6 王秀華;;高校研究性教學(xué)課程評價體系構(gòu)建研究[J];高等理科教育;2012年02期

7 高凌飚;過程性評價的理念和功能[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年06期

8 張曉京;;推動“以探究為基礎(chǔ)的學(xué)習(xí)”——關(guān)于實施“國家大學(xué)生創(chuàng)新性實驗計劃”的幾點思考[J];中國大學(xué)教學(xué);2008年01期

9 王莉;;研究性學(xué)習(xí)評價的多維審視[J];教學(xué)與管理;2010年12期

10 李云淑;研究性學(xué)習(xí)檔案袋評價的案例分析與實施建議[J];教育科學(xué)研究;2004年07期

，

本文編號：2013213