本文選題：印度　切入點(diǎn)：高等教育質(zhì)量　出處：《寧波大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：全球高等教育規(guī)模的不斷擴(kuò)大引發(fā)了社會(huì)各界對(duì)高等教育質(zhì)量的普遍關(guān)注。旨在維持和提高質(zhì)量的高等教育質(zhì)量保障體系已在一些國(guó)家和地區(qū)建立起來(lái)。作為我國(guó)的鄰國(guó)，，印度的高等教育成就顯著，并已形成了相對(duì)成熟的高等教育質(zhì)量保障體系。印度建立完善的高等教育評(píng)估制度的經(jīng)驗(yàn)值得我國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒。 本文以印度高等教育評(píng)估制度為研究對(duì)象，在梳理印度現(xiàn)代高等教育發(fā)展歷史的基礎(chǔ)上，指出其高等教育發(fā)展中產(chǎn)生的質(zhì)量問(wèn)題，部分地借用新制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的分析框架，從評(píng)估機(jī)構(gòu)、評(píng)估對(duì)象、評(píng)估指標(biāo)、評(píng)估程序等方面具體闡述評(píng)估制度規(guī)則體系中的正式規(guī)則，并進(jìn)一步從評(píng)估與高校、評(píng)估與政府、評(píng)估與社會(huì)、評(píng)估與評(píng)估機(jī)構(gòu)四個(gè)方面分析評(píng)估制度的實(shí)施機(jī)制與功能價(jià)值。本文認(rèn)為，自上世紀(jì)50、60年代，在經(jīng)歷不斷的改革之后，印度高等教育評(píng)估制度已較為完備，以之為核心也形成了比較穩(wěn)定的高等教育質(zhì)量保障體系。評(píng)估為高校改進(jìn)教學(xué)質(zhì)量提供建議，為政府相關(guān)部門(mén)制定向高校撥款的政策提供參考，并為社會(huì)提供高等教育信息。在此過(guò)程中，評(píng)估機(jī)構(gòu)也在不斷地完善自身功能，并獲得了更好的發(fā)展�，F(xiàn)在，印度正在不斷完善高等教育評(píng)估機(jī)構(gòu)建設(shè)，改進(jìn)評(píng)估工作實(shí)施的具體方式，同時(shí)注重加強(qiáng)與國(guó)外其它評(píng)估機(jī)構(gòu)的聯(lián)系，為新一輪的高等教育評(píng)估工作做準(zhǔn)備。論文對(duì)中印兩國(guó)的高等教育評(píng)估制度也展開(kāi)簡(jiǎn)要的比較，認(rèn)為，我國(guó)目前高等教育評(píng)估制度的發(fā)展和完善可以從以下六個(gè)方向考慮：強(qiáng)化第三方評(píng)估力量及其權(quán)威性；加強(qiáng)政府對(duì)評(píng)估事業(yè)的指導(dǎo)與財(cái)政保障；制定更具彈性化的評(píng)估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；建立高校自我評(píng)估機(jī)構(gòu)，培養(yǎng)質(zhì)量文化；改進(jìn)同行專(zhuān)家評(píng)估；提升評(píng)估結(jié)果公布的社會(huì)向度。
[Abstract]:The continuous expansion of the scale of higher education in the world has aroused widespread concern about the quality of higher education from all walks of life. The quality assurance system of higher education aimed at maintaining and improving the quality of higher education has been established in some countries and regions. India has made remarkable achievements in higher education and has formed a relatively mature higher education quality assurance system. The experience of establishing a perfect evaluation system of higher education in India is worthy of our country to learn and learn from. This paper takes the Indian higher education evaluation system as the research object, on the basis of combing the history of the development of India's modern higher education, points out the quality problems arising from the development of its higher education, and partly borrows the analytical framework of the new institutional economics. The formal rules in the rules system of evaluation system are elaborated from the aspects of evaluation institution, evaluation object, evaluation index, evaluation procedure and so on, and further from the aspects of evaluation and university, evaluation and government, evaluation and society, This paper analyses the implementation mechanism and functional value of the evaluation system from four aspects of the evaluation and evaluation institutions. This paper holds that, since 0th century, during the 1950s and 1960s, after the continuous reform, the Indian higher education evaluation system has been relatively complete. With this as the core, a relatively stable higher education quality assurance system has also been formed. The evaluation provides suggestions for improving the teaching quality of colleges and universities, and provides a reference for the relevant government departments to formulate the policies for the allocation of funds to colleges and universities. And provide higher education information for society. In the process, evaluation agencies are constantly improving their own functions and getting better development. Now, India is constantly improving the construction of higher education evaluation institutions. At the same time, we should pay more attention to strengthening the contact with other foreign evaluation institutions to prepare for a new round of higher education evaluation. The paper also makes a brief comparison of the higher education evaluation system between China and India. The author thinks that the development and perfection of the evaluation system of higher education in our country can be considered from the following six aspects: strengthening the third party evaluation power and its authority, strengthening the guidance and financial guarantee of the government to the evaluation cause; To develop more flexible evaluation criteria; to establish self-assessment institutions in colleges and universities to cultivate a quality culture; to improve peer expert evaluation; and to enhance the social orientation of the results.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G649.351

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 薛天祥,周海濤,時(shí)偉;高校擴(kuò)招與高等教育質(zhì)量保證[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

2 安雙宏;印度大學(xué)撥款委員會(huì)及其對(duì)我們的借鑒意義[J];比較教育研究;2003年12期

3 安雙宏;;印度政府對(duì)高等教育的管理[J];比較教育研究;2006年08期

4 施曉光;;印度教育“保留政策”問(wèn)題探析[J];比較教育研究;2008年10期

5 章建石;夏歡歡;;當(dāng)代印度高等教育評(píng)估歷史與制度[J];大學(xué)(學(xué)術(shù)版);2011年08期

6 李少華;李漢邦;;資源稀缺下的高等教育評(píng)估制度發(fā)展探析[J];國(guó)家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

7 田野;;日本、澳大利亞和印度高等教育質(zhì)量保證體系的比較研究與啟示[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2009年02期

8 楊濤;張海玲;;高等教育評(píng)估制度面臨的問(wèn)題及成因分析[J];中國(guó)科教創(chuàng)新導(dǎo)刊;2010年14期

9 馬陸亭;;國(guó)際性政府組織對(duì)大學(xué)排名的關(guān)注[J];北京教育(高教版);2008年05期

10 趙中建;印度高等教育發(fā)展迅速原因探析[J];高等教育研究;1991年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 宋鴻雁;印度私立高等教育發(fā)展研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年

2 嚴(yán)芳;教育元評(píng)估的理論與實(shí)踐研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1622220