發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-15 04:36

  本文選題：實(shí)踐智力　切入點(diǎn)：默會(huì)知識(shí)　出處：《山東師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在生活中經(jīng)常有這樣的現(xiàn)象：有的人學(xué)業(yè)成績(jī)很好，但是他們?cè)诠ぷ髦刑幚砣粘?wèn)題時(shí)卻表現(xiàn)不佳。而有的人的學(xué)業(yè)成績(jī)不是非常突出，在工作中卻表現(xiàn)得高人一等。出現(xiàn)這種現(xiàn)象的主要原因在于：學(xué)術(shù)與非學(xué)術(shù)環(huán)境對(duì)智力或能力結(jié)構(gòu)的要求不同。這種現(xiàn)象引發(fā)了學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)傳統(tǒng)智力理論的重新思考。在這種背景下，Sternberg等提出了實(shí)踐智力理論，彌補(bǔ)了傳統(tǒng)智力理論的不足，為研究智力對(duì)人們?cè)谌粘９ぷ髦斜憩F(xiàn)的影響指出了方向，并且研究者們編制了一些實(shí)踐智力的測(cè)驗(yàn)。 本研究以我國(guó)高校班干部為對(duì)象，根據(jù)Sternberg等提出的實(shí)踐智力理論和Wagner等提出的默會(huì)知識(shí)理論，編制了高校班干部班級(jí)管理默會(huì)知識(shí)問(wèn)卷，并對(duì)其信效度進(jìn)行了檢驗(yàn)。然后在研究了管理者績(jī)效的影響因素的基礎(chǔ)上，考查了高校班干部的實(shí)踐智力、智力和人格與他們的班級(jí)管理績(jī)效之間的關(guān)系，，探討了對(duì)班級(jí)管理績(jī)效的預(yù)測(cè)因素，并比較了它們的貢獻(xiàn)大小。本研究主要以山東師范大學(xué)的大三年級(jí)班干部為被試，采用問(wèn)卷調(diào)查的方法對(duì)高校班干部的實(shí)踐智力、智力和人格進(jìn)行了測(cè)量，使用SPSS17.0軟件對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析和處理，并對(duì)結(jié)果進(jìn)行了討論。研究結(jié)果如下： (1)本研究所編制的高校班干部班級(jí)管理默會(huì)知識(shí)問(wèn)卷具有較好的信度和效度； (2)默會(huì)知識(shí)的內(nèi)容包含3個(gè)維度，分別是管理自我、管理任務(wù)和管理他人； (3)高校班干部的實(shí)踐智力與智力之間具有中等的相關(guān)關(guān)系； (4)高校班干部的實(shí)踐智力、智力和人格與班級(jí)管理績(jī)效之間均有顯著的正相關(guān)： (5)高校班干部的實(shí)踐智力和智力均是班級(jí)管理績(jī)效的顯著預(yù)測(cè)源，兩者的預(yù)測(cè)效應(yīng)不同，實(shí)踐智力對(duì)班級(jí)管理績(jī)效的預(yù)測(cè)力明顯大于智力的預(yù)測(cè)作用。
[Abstract]:There are often phenomena in life: some people do well in school, but they do not do well in dealing with their daily problems at work. Some people do not do very well in their studies. The main reason for this phenomenon lies in the fact that the academic and non-academic environments have different demands on intelligence or ability structure. This phenomenon has caused the academic circles to rethink the traditional intelligence theory. In this context, Sternberg and others put forward the theory of practical intelligence, It makes up for the deficiency of traditional intelligence theory, points out the direction of studying the influence of intelligence on people's daily work, and the researchers have compiled some tests of practical intelligence. Based on the practical intelligence theory put forward by Sternberg et al and the tacit knowledge theory put forward by Wagner, this study compiled the class management tacit knowledge questionnaire of class cadres in colleges and universities in China. Then on the basis of studying the influencing factors of managers' performance, this paper examines the relationship between practical intelligence, intelligence, personality and class management performance of class cadres in colleges and universities. This paper discusses the predictive factors of class management performance and compares their contribution. This study mainly takes the junior class cadres of Shandong normal University as the subjects, and adopts the method of questionnaire to investigate the practical intelligence of the class cadres in colleges and universities. Intelligence and personality were measured, data were analyzed and processed using SPSS17.0 software, and the results were discussed. The results are as follows:. 1) the class management tacit knowledge questionnaire developed by this research has good reliability and validity; 2) the content of tacit knowledge includes three dimensions: managing self, managing task and managing others; (3) there is a moderate correlation between practical intelligence and intelligence of class cadres in colleges and universities; 4) the practical intelligence, intelligence and personality of class cadres in colleges and universities are positively correlated with class management performance. 5) the practical intelligence and intelligence of class cadres in colleges and universities are the significant predictors of class management performance. The predictive effects of the two are different, and the predictive power of practical intelligence to class management performance is obviously greater than that of intelligence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G645.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邵秀玲,劉國(guó)強(qiáng);王陽(yáng)明“知行合一”論及其現(xiàn)代價(jià)值[J];濱州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

2 吳國(guó)宏,李其維;再次超越IQ──斯騰伯格“成功智力”理論述評(píng)[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);1999年02期

3 劉磊,傅維利;實(shí)踐能力:含義、結(jié)構(gòu)及培養(yǎng)對(duì)策[J];教育科學(xué);2005年02期

4 肖江淑;;實(shí)踐智力及其教育含義[J];南方論刊;2008年11期

5 洪自強(qiáng),馮明;實(shí)踐智力和內(nèi)隱知識(shí)的研究進(jìn)展[J];人類工效學(xué);2000年01期

6 高笑;陳紅;;“大五”人格模型與工作績(jī)效關(guān)系的研究進(jìn)展[J];人類工效學(xué);2007年03期

7 傅維利;劉磊;;解析實(shí)踐智力理論[J];心理科學(xué);2006年03期

8 唐素萍;情景判斷測(cè)驗(yàn)的開發(fā)程序、構(gòu)思效度及研究趨勢(shì)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2004年01期

9 劉曉梅;卞冉;車宏生;王麗娜;邵燕萍;;情境判斷測(cè)驗(yàn)的效度研究述評(píng)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2011年05期

10 謝寶珍,金盛華;實(shí)踐智力、社會(huì)智力、情緒智力的概念及其教育價(jià)值[J];心理學(xué)探新;2001年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李莉;內(nèi)隱知識(shí)的理論與實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年

2 蔣京川;斯騰伯格的智力理論及其應(yīng)用研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉娜;大學(xué)生學(xué)生干部實(shí)踐智力研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：1614485