本文關(guān)鍵詞：基于綜合DEA評價(jià)模型的我國“985”高�？蒲锌冃гu價(jià)研究　出處：《哈爾濱工程大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： “985”高校 超效率DEA模型 交叉效率評價(jià)模型 被引用次數(shù)分析 Malmquist指數(shù)

【摘要】：我國“985”高校是中國科學(xué)技術(shù)以及創(chuàng)新的重點(diǎn)研究基地，其引領(lǐng)著我國關(guān)鍵科學(xué)技術(shù)研發(fā)核心的發(fā)展，是我國力爭創(chuàng)建與國外名校相媲美的科學(xué)前沿中心�；谖覈�985”高校的重要地位和作用，其獲取的國家教育科研經(jīng)費(fèi)不斷增長，如何科學(xué)評價(jià)其科研績效，，進(jìn)而合理配置其科研資源，充分挖掘科研潛力并促進(jìn)其科研實(shí)力以及科研績效的不斷提高，是一個(gè)重要的研究課題。而科研效率作為科研績效的重要體現(xiàn)，因此很有必要對我國“985”高校的科研投入與產(chǎn)出效率進(jìn)行深入地研究與分析。 本文以我國“985”高�？蒲型度氘a(chǎn)出效率為評價(jià)對象，遵循DEA評價(jià)的基本原則，結(jié)合我國“985”高校自身的特點(diǎn)與科研特色，構(gòu)建針對我國“985”高�？蒲型度氘a(chǎn)出效率評價(jià)的指標(biāo)體系；根據(jù)以往高�？蒲性u價(jià)方法的局限性構(gòu)建了綜合DEA評價(jià)模型，對我國“985”高�？蒲型度氘a(chǎn)出效率進(jìn)行評價(jià)。首先運(yùn)用CCR模型分析DEA有效單元，在DEA有效性分析的基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合超效率DEA評價(jià)方法、交叉效率評價(jià)方法以及被引用次數(shù)法對DEA有效的決策單元進(jìn)行分析，并且運(yùn)用基于DEA的Malmquist生產(chǎn)率指數(shù)方法進(jìn)行跨期生產(chǎn)率變動(dòng)研究，實(shí)現(xiàn)對教育部直屬高�？蒲行实撵o態(tài)與動(dòng)態(tài)的全面評價(jià)。最后針對我國“985”高�？蒲行试u價(jià)結(jié)果和由此反映的問題提出了進(jìn)一步提升我國“985”高�？蒲锌冃实恼呓ㄗh。 本文對我國“985”高�？蒲锌冃гu價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建和評價(jià)方法的選取、評價(jià)模型的建立進(jìn)行了深入的研究，其研究思路和結(jié)果對于如何科學(xué)全面地從效率的角度評價(jià)我國“985”高�？蒲锌冃Ь哂兄匾膮⒖己徒梃b意義。
[Abstract]:Chinese "985" colleges and universities are the key research bases of science and technology and innovation in China, which leads the development of the core of research and development of key science and technology in China. Is our country strives to establish the science front center which the foreign famous school competes with. Based on our country "985" university's important position and the function, its obtains the national education scientific research funds to increase unceasingly. How to scientifically evaluate its scientific research performance, and then rationally allocate its scientific research resources, fully tap the potential of scientific research and promote its scientific research strength and continuous improvement of scientific research performance. Scientific research efficiency is an important research subject, and scientific research efficiency is an important embodiment of scientific research performance. Therefore, it is necessary to deeply study and analyze the scientific research input and output efficiency of "985" colleges and universities in China. This paper takes the input-output efficiency of "985" colleges and universities in China as the evaluation object, follows the basic principles of DEA evaluation, and combines the characteristics and scientific research characteristics of the "985" colleges and universities in China. Constructing the index system for the evaluation of scientific research input-output efficiency of "985" colleges and universities in China; According to the limitations of the previous evaluation methods of scientific research in colleges and universities, a comprehensive DEA evaluation model is constructed. This paper evaluates the input-output efficiency of scientific research in "985" colleges and universities in China. Firstly, the CCR model is used to analyze the effective unit of DEA. Based on the analysis of the efficiency of DEA, the evaluation method of super-efficiency DEA is combined. The cross-efficiency evaluation method and the cited times method are used to analyze the effective decision making unit of DEA, and the Malmquist productivity index method based on DEA is used to study the intertemporal productivity change. To realize the static and dynamic evaluation of the scientific research efficiency of the universities directly under the Ministry of Education. Finally, aiming at the evaluation results of the scientific research efficiency of the "985" colleges and universities in China and the problems reflected therefrom, the paper puts forward the further improvement of the "985" in our country. Policy recommendations on the efficiency of Scientific Research performance in Colleges and Universities. In this paper, the establishment of the evaluation index system of scientific research performance of "985" colleges and universities in China, the selection of evaluation methods and the establishment of evaluation model have been deeply studied. Its research ideas and results have important reference and reference significance for how to evaluate the scientific research performance of "985" colleges and universities in China scientifically and comprehensively from the angle of efficiency.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工程大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G644

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃靜霞;;高�？蒲泄ぷ骺冃гu估的問題研究[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2012年03期

2 郭寧生;劉成梅;張樹娟;;高校科研團(tuán)隊(duì)績效考評體系研究[J];西北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

3 姜華;吳躍;孫新宇;葉濤;;省屬本科高�？冃гu價(jià)研究[J];大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年01期

4 姜彤彤;;我國31個(gè)省市自治區(qū)高�？蒲锌冃У膭�(dòng)態(tài)評價(jià)研究[J];黑龍江高教研究;2012年06期

5 姜彤彤;武德昆;;高等學(xué)�？冃гu價(jià)方法研究綜述[J];江蘇高教;2011年06期

6 李雨青;左和平;;高�？冃гu價(jià)研究現(xiàn)狀綜述[J];教育教學(xué)論壇;2012年04期

7 胡慶江;何瑋佳;柳銳;;基于DEA的“985工程”院�？蒲行试u價(jià)[J];科技進(jìn)步與對策;2011年19期

8 楊秀芹;;教育資源利用效率研究綜述[J];現(xiàn)代教育管理;2009年02期

9 李明勇;;高�？蒲屑�(lì)機(jī)制探析[J];黃河科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

10 隋萌萌;;高�？蒲性u價(jià)體系之問題及其實(shí)現(xiàn)策略淺析[J];教育教學(xué)論壇;2013年05期

本文編號(hào)：1403053