發(fā)散思維訓(xùn)練對62名初一學(xué)生創(chuàng)造力的影響
發(fā)布時間:2019-06-14 23:36
【摘要】:目的:探討發(fā)散思維訓(xùn)練對創(chuàng)造性個性和創(chuàng)造性思維的影響,探索培養(yǎng)創(chuàng)造力的有效途徑。方法:以119名初中一年級學(xué)生為被試,對62名(實(shí)驗(yàn)班)學(xué)生進(jìn)行發(fā)散思維訓(xùn)練,57名(對照班)學(xué)生不進(jìn)行發(fā)散思維訓(xùn)練。采用托倫斯創(chuàng)造思維測驗(yàn)、中學(xué)生創(chuàng)造性個性測驗(yàn)、學(xué)生發(fā)散思維測驗(yàn),對兩班學(xué)生于實(shí)驗(yàn)前后施測。結(jié)果:訓(xùn)練前,實(shí)驗(yàn)班和對照班學(xué)生創(chuàng)造性個性和創(chuàng)造性思維測驗(yàn)、發(fā)散思維測驗(yàn)總評分差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(9.3±2.1/9.1±1.9,t=1.47,P=0.293;9.1±0.8/8.4±0.5,t=5.21,P=0.291)。訓(xùn)練后,實(shí)驗(yàn)班學(xué)生創(chuàng)造性個性和創(chuàng)造性思維測驗(yàn)評分較對照班提高(10.5±1.9/9.4±2.1,t=2.96,P0.01);訓(xùn)練后發(fā)散思維測驗(yàn)評分實(shí)驗(yàn)班高于對照班(11.0±1.8/8.8±1.8,t=7.69,P0.01)。結(jié)論:發(fā)散思維訓(xùn)練對提高學(xué)生的創(chuàng)造力是有效的。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the influence of divergent thinking training on creative personality and creative thinking, and to explore an effective way to cultivate creativity. Methods: 119 students in the first grade of junior middle school were selected as subjects. 62 students (experimental class) were trained in divergent thinking, and 57 students (control class) were not trained in divergent thinking. Tolens creative thinking test, middle school students creative personality test, student divergent thinking test were used to test the students in two classes before and after the experiment. Results: before training, there was no significant difference in the total scores of creative personality and creative thinking test and divergent thinking test between the experimental class and the control class (9.3 鹵2.1 鹵9.1 鹵1.9, t = 1.47, P = 0.293 鹵9.1 鹵0.8 鹵8.4 鹵0.5, t = 5.21, P 鈮,
本文編號:2499793
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the influence of divergent thinking training on creative personality and creative thinking, and to explore an effective way to cultivate creativity. Methods: 119 students in the first grade of junior middle school were selected as subjects. 62 students (experimental class) were trained in divergent thinking, and 57 students (control class) were not trained in divergent thinking. Tolens creative thinking test, middle school students creative personality test, student divergent thinking test were used to test the students in two classes before and after the experiment. Results: before training, there was no significant difference in the total scores of creative personality and creative thinking test and divergent thinking test between the experimental class and the control class (9.3 鹵2.1 鹵9.1 鹵1.9, t = 1.47, P = 0.293 鹵9.1 鹵0.8 鹵8.4 鹵0.5, t = 5.21, P 鈮,
本文編號:2499793
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/ktjx/2499793.html
最近更新
教材專著