【摘要】： 目的：探討4-6年級學(xué)生語、數(shù)學(xué)科興趣的理論結(jié)構(gòu)，初步編制4-6年級學(xué)生語、數(shù)學(xué)科興趣量表，檢驗量表的信效度。 方法：采用理論探討與經(jīng)驗分析相結(jié)合的策略構(gòu)建量表。查閱文獻，參考前人研究成果，結(jié)合4-6年級學(xué)生、老師、家長訪談，確定語、數(shù)學(xué)科興趣量表的測驗內(nèi)容。采用探索性因素分析法發(fā)展量表的初步結(jié)構(gòu)，再用驗證性因素分析法驗證結(jié)構(gòu)的合理性。以Cronbach′α系數(shù)和重測信度檢驗量表的信度。以內(nèi)容效度、結(jié)構(gòu)效度、效標(biāo)效度檢驗量表的效度。 結(jié)果：1．結(jié)構(gòu)分析結(jié)果：語文學(xué)科興趣量表由16個項目，4個分量表組成；數(shù)學(xué)學(xué)科興趣量表由13個項目，3個分量表組成。2．項目分析結(jié)果：所有項目的通俗性水平在0.65-0.83之間，與所屬量表的相關(guān)在0.40-0.68之間，所有項目高低分組差異顯著。3．信度分析結(jié)果：語、數(shù)學(xué)科興趣量表及分量表的Cronbach′α系數(shù)在0.55-0.85之間，，重測信度在0.57-0.79之間。4．效度分析結(jié)果：分量表間相關(guān)及與所屬量表的相關(guān)在0.73-0.86之間；驗證性因素分析表明量表的理論模型與測驗數(shù)據(jù)擬合良好。量表及分量表的同時效度在0.20-0.41之間，預(yù)測效度在0.17-0.35之間。部分量表與分量表存在性別、年齡、城鄉(xiāng)差異。 結(jié)論：1．量表結(jié)構(gòu)較為理想；2．量表的難度、區(qū)分度良好；3．量表的內(nèi)部一致性信度、重測信度良好；4．量表具有良好的內(nèi)容效度、結(jié)構(gòu)效度與效標(biāo)效度。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the theoretical structure of the students' language and interest in mathematics in grades 4-6, and to develop the scale of students' language, mathematics interest and the reliability and validity of the scale. Methods: the scale was constructed by using the strategy of theoretical discussion and empirical analysis. By consulting the literature and referring to the previous research results, combining the interviews with the 4-6 grade students, teachers and parents, the test contents of the interest scale for language and Mathematics subjects were determined. The preliminary structure of the scale was developed by exploratory factor analysis and the rationality of the structure was verified by confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability of the scale was tested with Cronbach' 偽 coefficient and retest reliability. The validity of the scale was tested by content validity, structural validity and validity. Results: the Chinese subject interest scale consisted of 16 items and 4 subscales, and the mathematics subject interest scale consisted of 13 items and 3 subscales. 2. The results of item analysis showed that the general level of all items was between 0.65-0.83. The correlation with the scale was between 0.40-0.68. There were significant differences between the high and low groups of all items. 3. The results of reliability analysis: the Cronbach' 偽 coefficient of the Mathematical interest scale and the component Table was between 0.55-0.85. The reliability of retest was between 0.57-0.79. The validity analysis results showed that the correlation between subscales and the scale was 0.73-0.86, and the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the theoretical model of the scale fitted well with the test data. The simultaneous validity and predictive validity of the scale and its components were 0.20-0.41 and 0.17-0.35 respectively. There are sex, age, urban and rural differences between partial scale and subscale. Conclusion 1. The structure of the scale is ideal 2.The difficulty of the scale is good. The internal consistency reliability of the scale is good and the test-retest reliability is good 4.The scale has good content validity, structural validity and criterion validity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：G442

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 唐沛;語數(shù)學(xué)科興趣量表在7-9年級的適應(yīng)性研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2011年

本文編號：2232068