本文選題：Mincer模型 + 制度歧視　； 參考：《南京理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段公私部門之間或者公共部門內(nèi)部不同群體之間的教育回報(bào)率水平是怎樣的?是否存在與制度歧視相關(guān)的教育回報(bào)率差異?若有,差異到底有多大?在閱讀了大量的國(guó)內(nèi)外有關(guān)教育回報(bào)率的文獻(xiàn)后,發(fā)現(xiàn)眾多學(xué)者對(duì)我國(guó)的教育回報(bào)率進(jìn)行了研究,但極少有文章對(duì)教師和公務(wù)員的教育回報(bào)率進(jìn)行專門的估計(jì)并比較。本文根據(jù)相關(guān)課題的微觀數(shù)據(jù),對(duì)教師和公務(wù)員的教育回報(bào)率進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析,探究了公務(wù)員和教師的教育回報(bào)率的差異,該差異產(chǎn)生的原因,以及化解該差異的具體對(duì)策。 本文的研究結(jié)論得到了以下幾點(diǎn)結(jié)論：(1)教師與公務(wù)員的受教育程度普遍較高,差異并不太大,但教師部門本科以上學(xué)歷人員的比例遠(yuǎn)大于公務(wù)員部門；(2)公務(wù)員的平均薪酬水平略高于教師,教育對(duì)教師和公務(wù)員薪酬收入的影響是積極的,但影響的程度有異；(3)教師和公務(wù)員的教育回報(bào)率都不高,教師的教育回報(bào)率為0.9%,公務(wù)員的教育回報(bào)率是2.2%,但相對(duì)差距比較大；(4)不同學(xué)歷教育回報(bào)率的分析結(jié)果顯示,教師和公務(wù)員的薪酬收入是隨著教育水平的提高而遞增的,高學(xué)歷人員傾向于獲得更高的薪酬收入；(5)分位回歸結(jié)果表明,教師與公務(wù)員的教育回報(bào)率都有各自的變化趨勢(shì),在各分位點(diǎn)上,教師的教育回報(bào)率都明顯低于公務(wù)員的水平。
[Abstract]:What is the level of return on education between the public and private sectors or between different groups within the public sector? Is there a difference in the rate of return on education related to institutional discrimination? If so, how big is the difference? After reading a large number of domestic and foreign literature on the rate of return on education, it is found that many scholars have studied the rate of return on education in China, but few articles have specifically estimated and compared the rate of return of education between teachers and civil servants. Based on the microcosmic data of related subjects, this paper makes an empirical analysis of the return on education of teachers and civil servants, and probes into the differences between the educational returns of civil servants and teachers, the causes of the differences, and the concrete countermeasures to resolve the differences. The conclusions of this paper are as follows: (1) the educational level of teachers and civil servants is generally high, but the difference is not too great. However, the proportion of teachers with undergraduate or higher degrees is much larger than that of civil servants.) the average salary level of civil servants is slightly higher than that of teachers, and the impact of education on teachers' and civil servants' salaries is positive. However, the degree of influence is different (3) the rate of return on education of both teachers and civil servants is not high. The rate of return on education for teachers is 0.9. The rate of return on education for civil servants is 2.2, but the relative gap is quite large. The salary income of teachers and civil servants is increasing with the improvement of education level. The regression results show that both teachers and civil servants have their own trend of educational return. At each locus, teachers' educational returns were significantly lower than those of civil servants.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：G40-05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜育紅,孫志軍;中國(guó)欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)的教育、收入與勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)經(jīng)歷——基于內(nèi)蒙古赤峰市城鎮(zhèn)地區(qū)的研究[J];管理世界;2003年09期

2 陳玉宇,邢春冰;農(nóng)村工業(yè)化以及人力資本在農(nóng)村勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)中的角色[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年08期

3 張車偉;;人力資本回報(bào)率變化與收入差距:“馬太效應(yīng)”及其政策含義[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年12期

4 王海港;李實(shí);劉京軍;;城鎮(zhèn)居民教育收益率的地區(qū)差異及其解釋[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年08期

5 張車偉;薛欣欣;;國(guó)有部門與非國(guó)有部門工資差異及人力資本貢獻(xiàn)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年04期

6 尹志超;甘犁;;公共部門和非公共部門工資差異的實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年04期

7 張義博;;公共部門與非公共部門收入差異的變遷[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2012年04期

8 李丙紅;;基于政府部門人力資本投資理論的公務(wù)員收入探析[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年07期

9 謝延浩;孫劍平;;我國(guó)公務(wù)員薪酬的倫理困境與突圍路徑[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年02期

10 趙立彥;公務(wù)員薪酬水平問(wèn)題初探[J];連云港職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2004年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 婁世艷;中國(guó)教育收益率及其影響因素研究[D];南開大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1864145