本文關(guān)鍵詞： 大學(xué)生組織公正 機(jī)會(huì)公正 問卷編制 學(xué)校認(rèn)同　出處：《浙江師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：大學(xué)生組織公正是組織公正研究在學(xué)校情境中的拓展,主要探究了大學(xué)生在校園生活和經(jīng)歷中產(chǎn)生的對(duì)學(xué)校組織公正狀況的感知和觀念。大學(xué)生組織公正對(duì)高校管理有著重要的理論意義和實(shí)踐意義。然而目前大學(xué)生組織公正的研究資料比較缺乏,也沒有成熟的測(cè)量工具。因此,本研究編制了大學(xué)生組織公正感量表,旨在探討大學(xué)生組織公正的結(jié)構(gòu)和現(xiàn)狀,并分析了其對(duì)學(xué)校認(rèn)同的影響作用。本研究在文獻(xiàn)分析、訪談、問卷調(diào)查、會(huì)議討論、專家評(píng)定的基礎(chǔ)上編制了大學(xué)生組織公正感量表的題目,形成了初始問卷。之后用初始問卷進(jìn)行問卷調(diào)查,共回收有效樣本511份,進(jìn)行項(xiàng)目分析和探索性因素分析,刪除了11個(gè)題目,初步形成了大學(xué)生組織公正感正式問卷。在對(duì)正式問卷進(jìn)行發(fā)放和數(shù)據(jù)收集后,回收有效樣本351份,進(jìn)行驗(yàn)證性因素分析和信效度分析,最終形成了大學(xué)生組織公正感正式問卷。運(yùn)用正式問卷收集的數(shù)據(jù)對(duì)大學(xué)生組織公正感的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析,并對(duì)其在人口學(xué)變量上的差異進(jìn)行研究。通過施測(cè)自編的大學(xué)生組織公正感量表和修訂的學(xué)校認(rèn)同量表,并對(duì)兩者之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行相關(guān)分析和回歸分析。最后對(duì)大學(xué)生組織公正研究進(jìn)行了探討和展望。 主要研究成果如下： (1)大學(xué)生組織公正量表包含四個(gè)維度,19個(gè)題目,其中有一個(gè)反向題,分別是：包含分配公正(4個(gè)題目)、程序公正(7個(gè)題目)、機(jī)會(huì)公正(5個(gè)題目)和人際公正(3個(gè)題目)�？倖柧淼母饕蛩亟忉屪儺惲吭�12.456%～14.238%之間,累積解釋變異量達(dá)到53.233%。 (2)問卷具有較好的信效度。總問卷的內(nèi)部一致性系數(shù)為0.879,各維度的內(nèi)部一致性系數(shù)在0.693～0.818之間。內(nèi)容效度和結(jié)構(gòu)效度符合相關(guān)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),而驗(yàn)證性因素分析報(bào)告中的擬合指標(biāo)為：x2/df=1.968, RMR0.053, RMSEA=0.053, GFI、AGFI、NNFI、 CFI、IFI都大于0.90,表明模型整體擬合較好。 (3)當(dāng)前我國(guó)大學(xué)生組織公正感處于中等水平,組織公正感的總分達(dá)到3.73,在各個(gè)維度的表現(xiàn)來看,分配公正和程序公正感偏低,機(jī)會(huì)公正水平次之,互動(dòng)公正水平較高。 (4)大學(xué)生組織公正在性別、專業(yè)、擔(dān)任學(xué)生干部等變量上沒有顯著差異,而在學(xué)校類別和年級(jí)變量上存在明顯差異。 (5)大學(xué)生組織公正感對(duì)學(xué)校認(rèn)同有顯著預(yù)測(cè)作用,四個(gè)維度中程序公正、機(jī)會(huì)公正和分配公正對(duì)學(xué)校認(rèn)同有顯著的正向預(yù)測(cè)作用,而互動(dòng)公正與學(xué)校認(rèn)同也有顯著的正向相關(guān)關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:The organizational justice of college students is the expansion of the study of organizational justice in the school context. This paper mainly probes into the perception and concept of college students' organizational justice arising from their campus life and experience. The organizational justice of college students has important theoretical and practical significance to the management of colleges and universities. However, at present, college students have great significance in practice. Research materials on organizational justice are relatively lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the structure and current situation of college students' organizational justice, and to analyze its influence on school identity. On the basis of questionnaire survey, conference discussion and expert evaluation, the title of college students' sense of organizational justice scale was compiled, and the initial questionnaire was formed. After that, 511 valid samples were collected. Through project analysis and exploratory factor analysis, 11 topics were deleted, and a formal questionnaire on college students' sense of organizational justice was initially formed. After issuing the formal questionnaire and collecting data, 351 valid samples were recovered. By means of confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity analysis, the formal questionnaire of college students' sense of organizational justice was formed, and the current situation of college students' sense of organizational justice was analyzed by using the data collected by the formal questionnaire. And the differences in demographic variables were studied. Through the self-designed scale of college students' sense of organizational justice and the revised scale of school identity, The correlation analysis and regression analysis of the relationship between the two are carried out. Finally, the research on the organizational justice of college students is discussed and prospected. The main findings are as follows:. 1) the organizational justice scale for college students includes four dimensions, 19 questions, and one reverse question. They were: distributive justice (4 questions), procedural justice (7 questions), opportunity justice (5 questions) and interpersonal justice (3 questions). The variance of each factor in the total questionnaire was between 12.456% and 14.238%, and the cumulative interpretation variation reached 53.233%. The internal consistency coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.879, the internal consistency coefficient of each dimension was between 0.693 and 0.818. The content validity and structural validity met the relevant criteria. The fitting indexes in the confirmatory factor analysis report are: 1: X 2 / dfc68, RMR 0.053, RMSEAA 0.053, GFI AGFI NNFI, CFI IFI > 0.90, which indicates that the model fits well as a whole. 3) at present, the sense of organizational justice of college students in our country is in the middle level, and the total score of the sense of organizational justice is 3.73. In each dimension, the sense of distributive justice and procedural justice is low, the level of opportunity justice is the second, and the level of interactive justice is higher. (4) there were no significant differences in gender, specialty, student cadre and other variables, but there were obvious differences in school category and grade variables. 5) the sense of organizational justice of college students has a significant predictive effect on school identity, procedural justice in four dimensions, opportunity justice and distributive justice have significant positive predictive effect on school identity. There is also a significant positive correlation between interactive justice and school identity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B844.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 張光;劉偉偉;;重程序還是重結(jié)果?——大學(xué)生公平感的實(shí)證研究[J];青年研究;2008年11期

2 呂曉俊;劉幫成;;高校大學(xué)生公平心理與行為的研究——基于教育公平感的視角[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期

3 向澤雄;;當(dāng)代大學(xué)生組織認(rèn)同現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查研究——以華東地區(qū)某高校為例[J];宿州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

4 祝大鵬;;獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金評(píng)定中的組織公正感和成就動(dòng)機(jī)對(duì)體育院校大學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)行為的影響[J];武漢體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

5 周杰;;企業(yè)員工組織公正感與組織公民行為的關(guān)系[J];心理科學(xué);2009年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1538220