本文選題：國(guó)學(xué) + 國(guó)學(xué)學(xué)科��； 參考：《中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：目前學(xué)界關(guān)于"國(guó)學(xué)"學(xué)科的設(shè)置與建設(shè)之所以存在較大爭(zhēng)議,關(guān)鍵就在于對(duì)當(dāng)代中國(guó)所需"國(guó)學(xué)"的實(shí)質(zhì)缺乏共識(shí)。其實(shí)"國(guó)學(xué)"熱的興起和持續(xù)升溫已可表明,當(dāng)代中國(guó)無(wú)論是個(gè)人層面、社會(huì)層面還是國(guó)家層面,都迫切需要基于自身文化傳統(tǒng)和國(guó)情,建立并彰顯一套不完全仿效西方的現(xiàn)代中國(guó)之道,即自成一體的中國(guó)現(xiàn)代性觀念和現(xiàn)代化模式。"國(guó)學(xué)"學(xué)科的設(shè)置不僅是必要的,也是合理的和可能的。但要真正建設(shè)好"國(guó)學(xué)"學(xué)科,必須以建立和彰顯現(xiàn)代中國(guó)之道為旨?xì)w,合理協(xié)調(diào)古今之間、中外之間、不同民族之間、不同流派之間、不同學(xué)科之間等各個(gè)方面的關(guān)系,同時(shí)還必須探求并建立一套現(xiàn)代中國(guó)的"詮釋之道"。
[Abstract]:At present, there is a great controversy about the establishment and construction of the subject of "National Science" in the academic circles. The key lies in the lack of consensus on the essence of the "National Science" needed in contemporary China. In fact, the rise and continuous warming of the "National Science" heat can show that contemporary China, whether at the individual level, the social level or the national level, is urgently needed on the basis of its own cultural transmission. To establish and highlight a set of modern Chinese ways that do not fully emulate the western countries, that is, the modern concept of modernity and the modern mode of China, which are self-contained. The setting of the discipline of "National Science" is not only necessary but also reasonable and possible. To coordinate the relationship between ancient and modern, between China and foreign countries, between different ethnic groups, between different schools and between different disciplines, we must also explore and establish a set of "ways of interpretation" of modern China.
【作者單位】： 湖南大學(xué)岳麓書院哲學(xué)系;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目“中國(guó)經(jīng)典詮釋傳統(tǒng)的理論化與現(xiàn)代化研究”(14ZDB006);國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金一般項(xiàng)目“現(xiàn)代新儒家的本體論探索與‘中國(guó)現(xiàn)代性設(shè)計(jì)’研究”(10BZX058)
【分類號(hào)】：G122
，

本文編號(hào)：2006694