本文選題：國(guó)學(xué)熱　切入點(diǎn)：馬克思主義史學(xué)　出處：《理論月刊》2012年08期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)90年代以來(lái),"國(guó)學(xué)熱"再度在中華大地勃興,其大體可以《百家講壇》的熱播為界分為前后兩個(gè)階段。前段以20世紀(jì)國(guó)學(xué)大師們的"復(fù)活"及史學(xué)規(guī)范等命題的討論為中心,后期則轉(zhuǎn)向了"學(xué)術(shù)下移",國(guó)學(xué)開(kāi)始通俗化與大眾化,并愈演愈烈。思潮背后,我們要對(duì)國(guó)學(xué)與馬克思主義的關(guān)系、與中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)儒學(xué)的關(guān)系及其與西學(xué)的關(guān)系等有著正確的分析與判斷,以保證20世紀(jì)90年代以來(lái)的這場(chǎng)"國(guó)學(xué)熱"的正確發(fā)展道路與前進(jìn)方向。
[Abstract]:Since 1990s, the "fever of Chinese culture" has once again flourished in the land of China. It can be roughly divided into two stages: the hot broadcast of the "hundred pulpit". The previous section centers on the discussion of the proposition of "resurrection" and the norms of historiography put forward by the masters of Sinology in 20th century. In the later period, we turned to the "academic downshift", and the traditional Chinese studies began to become popular and become more popular. Behind the trend of thought, we should have a better understanding of the relationship between the study of Chinese culture and Marxism. The relationship with Chinese traditional Confucianism and the relationship with western learning has been correctly analyzed and judged in order to ensure the correct development path and forward direction of the "fever of Chinese culture" since 1990s.
【作者單位】： 江蘇大學(xué)文法學(xué)院;
【基金】：江蘇大學(xué)高級(jí)人才專(zhuān)項(xiàng)基金資助項(xiàng)目(11JDG183)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G122

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐友漁;;“國(guó)學(xué)熱”的淺層與深層問(wèn)題[J];博覽群書(shū);2009年11期

2 方克立;;創(chuàng)建適應(yīng)時(shí)代需要的新國(guó)學(xué)[J];高校理論戰(zhàn)線;2008年08期

3 祝沛章;;對(duì)當(dāng)前“讀經(jīng)運(yùn)動(dòng)”的思考[J];科教文匯(下旬刊);2007年01期

4 李中華;;對(duì)“國(guó)學(xué)熱”的透視與反思[J];理論視野;2007年01期

5 胡繩;介紹一篇文章[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號(hào)：1597431