發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-26 20:52

  本文選題：黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo) + 審判權(quán)��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨是我國(guó)的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)黨、執(zhí)政黨,堅(jiān)持黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)是我國(guó)四項(xiàng)基本原則的核心內(nèi)容,法院依法獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán)是我國(guó)“依法治國(guó),建設(shè)社會(huì)主義國(guó)家”治國(guó)方略的重要組成部分,二者都是我國(guó)現(xiàn)行憲法所規(guī)定的原則,正確處理二者關(guān)系對(duì)推進(jìn)我國(guó)法治建設(shè)有著重要的意義。 在堅(jiān)持中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下,法院獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán)是我們處理黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與法院行使審判權(quán)關(guān)系的基本立場(chǎng)。黨在我國(guó)政治生活中的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位從未動(dòng)搖,堅(jiān)持黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)是必須的,而以黨治國(guó)的治國(guó)方略在歷史發(fā)展中逐漸被依法治國(guó)的治國(guó)方略所取代,改善黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)方式也是必須的。歷史上黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)積累了哪些經(jīng)驗(yàn)?又存在哪些弊端?當(dāng)今如何改善黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)?厘清這些問(wèn)題,有助于正確認(rèn)識(shí)和處理黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與法院獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán)的關(guān)系。筆者長(zhǎng)期在政法委工作,主要從自身工作的實(shí)際情況出發(fā),從憲政的視野去研究黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與法院行使審判權(quán)的關(guān)系。采用調(diào)查研究、對(duì)比研究等方式,客觀評(píng)價(jià)司法實(shí)踐中的黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與法院獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán)的關(guān)系,并展開(kāi)解決該矛盾的一些設(shè)想。 本論文共分為四個(gè)部分,另加引言和結(jié)論。引言明確了作者的觀點(diǎn),提出本文的研究目的。第一部分為黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與法院行使審判權(quán)關(guān)系的歷史,從歷史的延續(xù)性的角度,闡述新中國(guó)成立以來(lái)的四個(gè)歷史時(shí)期二者的關(guān)系。第二部分為黨組織在保障法院獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán)方面的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。第三部分是黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與法院獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán)的沖突。第四部分是實(shí)現(xiàn)黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)與法院獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán)的若干思考。
[Abstract]:The Communist Party of China is the leading party in our country, and the ruling party, insisting on the leadership of the party is the core content of the four basic principles of our country, and the independent exercise of judicial power by the courts is the rule of law in our country. The important part of the strategy of ruling the country in building a socialist country, both of them are the principles stipulated in the current constitution of our country, and it is of great significance to correctly handle the relationship between the two to promote the construction of the rule of law in our country. Under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, the independent exercise of judicial power by the court is our basic position in handling the relationship between the leadership of the Party and the exercise of judicial power by the court. The Party's leading position in our country's political life has never wavered, it is necessary to insist on the Party's leadership, and the strategy of ruling the country by the Party is gradually replaced by the strategy of ruling the country according to law in the historical development, so it is necessary to improve the Party's leading way. What experience has the Party's leadership accumulated in history? What are the drawbacks? How to improve the Party's leadership today? To clarify these problems is helpful to correctly understand and deal with the relationship between the leadership of the Party and the independent exercise of judicial power by the courts. The author has been working in the political and legal Commission for a long time, mainly from the actual situation of his own work, from the perspective of constitutionalism to study the relationship between the leadership of the Party and the exercise of judicial power by the court. By means of investigation and comparative study, this paper objectively evaluates the relationship between the leadership of the Party in judicial practice and the independent exercise of judicial power by the court, and puts forward some tentative ideas for resolving this contradiction. This paper is divided into four parts, plus introduction and conclusion. The introduction clarifies the author's point of view and puts forward the purpose of this paper. The first part is the history of the relationship between the leadership of the Party and the exercise of judicial power by the court. From the perspective of the continuity of history, the paper expounds the relationship between the two in the four historical periods since the founding of New China. The second part is the experience of party organizations in ensuring the independent exercise of judicial power. The third part is the conflict between the leadership of the Party and the independent exercise of judicial power by the court. The fourth part is to realize the party's leadership and the court to exercise judicial power independently.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D921;D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 龍斌;;淺議“文革”時(shí)期黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)方式的教訓(xùn)[J];成都大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

2 劉紅凜;;《政黨法》的世界概況與主要成因[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2009年01期

3 鐵犁;黨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人民與人民監(jiān)督黨——論黨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人大與人大對(duì)黨的監(jiān)督[J];法學(xué);1995年12期

4 郝鐵川;依法治國(guó)的十大建議[J];法學(xué);1996年05期

5 徐顯明;司法改革二十題[J];法學(xué);1999年09期

6 劉大生;;黨主立憲：是什么，，不是什么[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

7 陳庭忠;論政策和法律的協(xié)調(diào)與銜接[J];理論探討;2001年01期

8 韓勇;周曉軍;;執(zhí)政黨與司法機(jī)關(guān)關(guān)系新模式研究[J];寧夏黨校學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

本文編號(hào)：1807596