上好大學(xué)值得嗎——對大學(xué)質(zhì)量回報的估計
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-09 20:47
【摘要】：國內(nèi)現(xiàn)有研究大多關(guān)注大學(xué)教育數(shù)量的經(jīng)濟(jì)田報,較少關(guān)注大學(xué)教育質(zhì)量的經(jīng)濟(jì)回報。由于存在不可觀測的異質(zhì)性和異質(zhì)性回報,OLS、匹配法和工具變量法等方法都難以正確估計大學(xué)質(zhì)量的回報。本文基于2004年中國城鎮(zhèn)住戶調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù),以"211"大學(xué)作為中國高質(zhì)量大學(xué)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),使用赫克曼等人建立的異質(zhì)性模型,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國大學(xué)質(zhì)量的平均回報率(ATE)為11,4%。這說明在中國,大學(xué)質(zhì)量對勞動者的收入存在正面影響。研究還發(fā)現(xiàn)無論對于處理組還是非處理組,選擇偏差均為負(fù)而分類收益均為正,表明個體基于比較優(yōu)勢自愿地做出了是否上"211"大學(xué)的選擇。
[Abstract]:Most of the existing studies focus on the economic returns of the quantity of university education, and less on the economic returns of the quality of university education. Because of the unobservable heterogeneity and heterogeneity, it is difficult to estimate the return of university quality by OLS, matching method and tool variable method. Based on the data of Chinese urban household survey in 2004, using the "211" university as the standard of high quality universities in China and using the heterogeneity model established by Heckman et al., it is found that the average rate of return of university quality in China is 11% 4%. This shows that in China, university quality has a positive impact on the income of workers. The study also found that for both the treatment group and the non-treatment group, the selection deviation was negative and the classification benefit was positive, which indicated that the individual made the choice of whether to attend "211" university voluntarily based on comparative advantage.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與工商管理學(xué)院/首都教育經(jīng)濟(jì)研究院;中國工商銀行博士后科研工作站;
【基金】：全國教育科學(xué)規(guī)劃項目(EFA060203) “中央高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項資金”(北京師范大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與工商管理學(xué)院自主科研項目2015905)
【分類號】：G649.2
本文編號：2321517
[Abstract]:Most of the existing studies focus on the economic returns of the quantity of university education, and less on the economic returns of the quality of university education. Because of the unobservable heterogeneity and heterogeneity, it is difficult to estimate the return of university quality by OLS, matching method and tool variable method. Based on the data of Chinese urban household survey in 2004, using the "211" university as the standard of high quality universities in China and using the heterogeneity model established by Heckman et al., it is found that the average rate of return of university quality in China is 11% 4%. This shows that in China, university quality has a positive impact on the income of workers. The study also found that for both the treatment group and the non-treatment group, the selection deviation was negative and the classification benefit was positive, which indicated that the individual made the choice of whether to attend "211" university voluntarily based on comparative advantage.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與工商管理學(xué)院/首都教育經(jīng)濟(jì)研究院;中國工商銀行博士后科研工作站;
【基金】：全國教育科學(xué)規(guī)劃項目(EFA060203) “中央高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項資金”(北京師范大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與工商管理學(xué)院自主科研項目2015905)
【分類號】：G649.2
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 葛玉好;;教育回報異質(zhì)性問題研究[J];南方經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年04期
2 汪旺根;;南疆地區(qū)高校教師隊伍建設(shè)的異質(zhì)性分析[J];喀什師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年06期
3 王勇;蔡娟;;大學(xué)畢業(yè)生工作搜尋促進(jìn)策略的實(shí)證分析——基于勞動力供需偏好異質(zhì)性耦合視角[J];黑龍江高教研究;2014年09期
4 張巍巍;李雪松;;中國高等教育異質(zhì)性回報的變化:1992～2009——基于MTE方法的實(shí)證研究[J];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年03期
5 汪旺根;;同質(zhì)性原則下的異質(zhì)性思考——南疆地區(qū)高校教師隊伍建設(shè)思路探討[J];喀什師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年06期
6 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 湖北 張小明;舍本逐末 大學(xué)生創(chuàng)業(yè)最大的軟肋[N];中國電腦教育報;2004年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張云云;知識異質(zhì)性視角下的大學(xué)衍生企業(yè)知識網(wǎng)絡(luò)研究[D];天津大學(xué);2012年
，本文編號：2321517
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/gaodengjiaoyulunwen/2321517.html
最近更新
教材專著
