發(fā)布時間：2018-05-13 14:13

  本文選題：科研評估 + 科研卓越框架��； 參考：《天津理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：2014年12月,英國高等教育基金委員會(HEFCE)公布了科研卓越框架(Research Excellence Framework,REF)的評估結(jié)果,受到世界各國廣泛關(guān)注。REF重視科研成果的創(chuàng)新和社會效益,在評估單元、評估要素、參評人員等方面做了較大調(diào)整。其中最重要的就是新增加了“科研影響力”這一評估要素,體現(xiàn)了英國科研追求卓越和創(chuàng)新,重視科研成果的社會效益,致力于建設(shè)創(chuàng)新型國家。隨著科研評估的改革,與科研評估結(jié)果掛鉤的科研撥款模式也有相應(yīng)的調(diào)整�；赗EF科研評估結(jié)果的科研撥款,在延續(xù)雙重科研撥款制度(dual support system,DSS)的基礎(chǔ)上采用基于學(xué)科的公式化撥款模式,即高等教育基金委員會根據(jù)REF評估結(jié)果等級按照公式化方法分配科研經(jīng)費。英國科研卓越框架(REF)及其撥款模式促進(jìn)了英國各類大學(xué)及高等教育的發(fā)展,科研創(chuàng)新能力得到大幅度提升,增強了科研國際競爭力。但REF在發(fā)揮了眾多的正效應(yīng)時也存在著一定的問題。運用文獻(xiàn)分析法、內(nèi)容分析法、對比研究法等研究方法對英國科研卓越框架(REF)及其撥款模式進(jìn)行較為全面系統(tǒng)的分析,在總結(jié)其特點和影響的基礎(chǔ)上探討英國卓越框架(REF)及其撥款模式對我國科研評估和學(xué)科評估的啟示。首先,從英國科研評估產(chǎn)生的背景出發(fā)分析REF的產(chǎn)生過程,以REF整個評估框架為依托,具體分析每個評估指標(biāo)、評估內(nèi)容及評估方法等。REF評估具有以學(xué)科為基礎(chǔ)精簡評估單元、新增“科研影響力”、縮減參評人員等特點,反映了REF評估中“公正”、“學(xué)科”、“卓越”和“協(xié)同”的價值理念。其次,在研究英國科研撥款制度發(fā)展階段的基礎(chǔ)上分析基于REF評估結(jié)果的公式撥款模式,主要分析經(jīng)常性科研撥款的科研質(zhì)量撥款�？蒲袚芸铙w制中半官方主體及科研教學(xué)撥款分離的特色值得我國學(xué)習(xí)借鑒。最后,宏觀分析英國科研卓越框架(REF)及其撥款模式的影響,并結(jié)合其特點為我國科研評估和學(xué)科評估提出可行性建議。建議我國科研評估要引入權(quán)威半官方機(jī)構(gòu)、評估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)多元化、建立經(jīng)常性科研經(jīng)費、發(fā)展重點學(xué)科、學(xué)科評估落實學(xué)科分類思想等。
[Abstract]:In December 2014, the UK higher Education Fund Board announced the results of the research excellence framework, Research Excellence Framework, which has attracted worldwide attention. Ref attaches importance to the innovation and social benefits of scientific research results. Participants and other aspects of the major adjustments. The most important is to add the "scientific research influence", which embodies the pursuit of excellence and innovation in scientific research in Britain, attaches importance to the social benefits of scientific research results, and devotes to the construction of an innovative country. With the reform of scientific research evaluation, the scientific research funding model linked to the results of scientific research evaluation has been adjusted accordingly. Based on the results of REF research evaluation, the research funding model based on discipline formulation is adopted on the basis of the continuation of the dual support system. That is, the higher Education Fund Committee allocates research funds according to the REF evaluation level according to the formulaic method. The British Framework of Excellence in Scientific Research and its funding model have promoted the development of universities and higher education in the United Kingdom, greatly improved the ability of scientific research innovation and enhanced the international competitiveness of scientific research. But REF also has some problems when it exerts many positive effects. By using the methods of literature analysis, content analysis and comparative research, this paper makes a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the British Framework of Excellence in Scientific Research (REFF) and its funding model. On the basis of summing up its characteristics and influence, this paper discusses the enlightenment of the British Framework of Excellence (REF) and its funding model to the evaluation of scientific research and subject evaluation in China. First of all, based on the background of the British scientific research evaluation, this paper analyzes the process of REF. Based on the whole evaluation framework of REF, it concretely analyzes each evaluation index, the evaluation content and the evaluation method, and so on. The evaluation has a simplified evaluation unit based on the subject. The new characteristics of "scientific research influence" and the reduction of the number of participants reflect the values of "justice", "discipline", "excellence" and "synergy" in REF evaluation. Secondly, on the basis of the research on the development stage of the British scientific research funding system, this paper analyzes the formula allocation model based on the REF evaluation results, and mainly analyzes the research quality allocation of the recurrent scientific research funding. The separation of semi-official subjects and scientific research teaching grants in the system of scientific research grants is worthy of our country to learn from. Finally, the impact of UK Framework of Excellence in Scientific Research (REFF) and its funding model is analyzed, and some feasible suggestions are put forward for our country's scientific research evaluation and subject evaluation combined with its characteristics. It is suggested that the scientific research evaluation in our country should introduce the authoritative semi-official organization, diversify the evaluation standard, establish the regular research funds, develop the key disciplines, and carry out the subject classification idea.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G644

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陸根書;張曉磊;;荷蘭高�？蒲性u估實踐及啟示[J];大學(xué)(研究與評價);2007年11期

2 陸根書;楊兆芳;;英國高校科研評估的特點及啟示[J];大學(xué)(研究與評價);2008年01期

3 劉蓉潔;趙彩霞;;荷蘭高�？蒲性u估的特點及啟示[J];世界教育信息;2009年11期

4 劉文達(dá),邰忠智,李光澤;淺談高校科研評估體系的構(gòu)建[J];科技管理研究;1999年01期

5 姜亞洲;;英國高�？蒲性u估制度改革[J];教育;2012年29期

6 劉慧卿;;地方高校科研評估指標(biāo)體系設(shè)計[J];中國高�？萍寂c產(chǎn)業(yè)化;2010年08期

7 高宏利;李作學(xué);王前;;高校科研評估指標(biāo)及其實證研究[J];教育科學(xué);2011年02期

8 欒明香;;英國高�？蒲性u估政策及其借鑒意義[J];北京行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年03期

9 周鵬;;尋求高校教學(xué)科研的均衡發(fā)展——《高校科研評估》評介[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2007年08期

10 林家驥;高�？蒲性u估指標(biāo)量化初探[J];研究與發(fā)展管理;1990年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 姜金秋;;高校科研評估制度國際比較及對中國的啟示[A];2010年中國教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集[C];2010年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條

1 記者 郭扶庚 通訊員 黃秋斌;國內(nèi)高校SCI論文統(tǒng)計排出前十名[N];光明日報;2000年

2 曉歌;清華北大南大名列三甲[N];科技日報;2000年

3 記者 劉繼安;清華北大南大位居前三[N];中國教育報;2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 羅侃;英國高�？蒲性u估研究[D];西南大學(xué);2008年

2 左小娟;科研卓越框架（REF）：英國高校科研評估改革及其撥款模式研究[D];天津理工大學(xué);2017年

3 程文婧;當(dāng)代英國高�？蒲性u估改革研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2014年

4 趙覓;英國高校科研評估（RAE）研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1883500