本文選題：大學(xué)生 + 公民素質(zhì)量表��； 參考：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程的發(fā)展,在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)背景下公民素問(wèn)題越來(lái)越突出。而大學(xué)生是我國(guó)將來(lái)文化、經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治推進(jìn)的主要力量,因此大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)的高低,不但對(duì)其本身的長(zhǎng)足發(fā)展有重要影響作用,更重要的是影響將來(lái)公民群體的素質(zhì)高低,所以大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)的提高變得非常迫切。而到目前為止還沒(méi)有系統(tǒng)的揭示大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu),有關(guān)大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)與父母撫養(yǎng)方式的研究也很少見(jiàn),因而探究大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu)以及與家庭撫養(yǎng)方式有重要的理論意義和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本研究的研究對(duì)象為大一到大四的在校大學(xué)生,首先編制了大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)量表,分為三步:第一,篩選大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)相關(guān)的資料,形成初始問(wèn)卷;其次,采用探索性因素分析建立大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)的結(jié)構(gòu)模型;最后,通過(guò)驗(yàn)證性因素分析的方法建立了信度和效度都符合測(cè)量學(xué)要求的大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)問(wèn)卷。并以此為研究工具,采用方差分析、相關(guān)分析、回歸分析等方法對(duì)大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)發(fā)展特點(diǎn),及它與父母撫養(yǎng)方式的關(guān)系進(jìn)行考察。研究結(jié)論如下:1.大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu)由道德素質(zhì)(社會(huì)公德、職業(yè)道德、家庭美德)、文化素質(zhì)(科學(xué)素質(zhì)、人文知識(shí)、人文精神)、法律素質(zhì)(法律評(píng)價(jià)、法律意識(shí)、法律行為)、政治素質(zhì)(政治價(jià)值傾向、政治意識(shí)、政治行為)幾個(gè)維度構(gòu)成,構(gòu)成多層次的結(jié)構(gòu)模型。2.大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)問(wèn)卷有較高的信效度。3.大學(xué)生職業(yè)道德、科學(xué)素質(zhì)、人文精神在性別上差異顯著。其中,在職業(yè)道德、人文精神維度上女生的平均值高于男生,差異顯著;在科學(xué)素質(zhì)這個(gè)維度上,男生的平均值要高于女生,差異顯著。4.大學(xué)生政治價(jià)值傾向、政治意識(shí)在政治面貌上差異顯著。黨員和共青團(tuán)員差異顯著,群眾和共青團(tuán)員差異顯著。5.大學(xué)生文化素質(zhì)在年級(jí)上差異顯著,大三、大四學(xué)生的均值高于大一學(xué)生且差異顯著。6.父母教養(yǎng)方式中情感溫暖理解這一維度與大學(xué)生生公民素質(zhì)各維度呈顯著的正相關(guān)關(guān)系;而嚴(yán)厲懲罰同多個(gè)維度呈顯著的負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系。7.父母教養(yǎng)方式情感溫暖理解這個(gè)維度能顯著的正向預(yù)測(cè)公民素質(zhì)中的道德、文化、法律、政治素質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:With the development of China's modernization process, the problem of citizenship is becoming more and more prominent under the background of market economy. College students are the main force in the future cultural, economic and political advancement of our country. Therefore, the quality of college students not only has an important impact on their own rapid development, but also affects the quality of future citizens. So the improvement of university student citizen quality becomes very urgent. So far, there has not been a systematic disclosure of the structure of college students' civic quality, and studies on the quality of college students and their parents' rearing styles are also very rare. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to explore the structure of college students' civic quality and their ways of raising their families. The research object of this study is freshman to senior college students. Firstly, the scale of college students' citizen quality is compiled, which is divided into three steps: first, selecting the relevant information of college students' citizen quality, forming the initial questionnaire; secondly, The structural model of college students' citizen quality is established by exploratory factor analysis. Finally, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire are established by means of confirmatory factor analysis. By using the method of variance analysis, correlation analysis and regression analysis, the characteristics of college students' citizen quality development and the relationship between them and their parents' upbringing style were investigated. The conclusion of the study is as follows: 1. The structure of college students' civic quality consists of moral quality (social morality, professional ethics, family virtue), cultural quality (scientific quality, humanistic knowledge, humanistic spirit), legal quality (legal evaluation, legal consciousness). Legal behavior, political quality (political value tendency, political consciousness, political behavior) is composed of several dimensions, forming a multi-level structural model. The questionnaire has higher reliability and validity. Professional ethics, scientific quality and humanistic spirit of college students are significantly different in gender. Among them, the average value of female students is higher than that of boys in the dimension of professional ethics and humanistic spirit, the difference is significant; in the dimension of scientific quality, the average value of boys is higher than that of girls, the difference is significant. 4. College students' political value tendency and political consciousness are different in political outlook. The difference between the Party members and the Communist Youth League members is significant, and the difference between the masses and the Communist Youth League members is significant. 5. The cultural quality of college students is significantly different in grade. The average value of junior and senior students is higher than that of freshmen and the difference is significant. 6. There is a significant positive correlation between emotional warmth and understanding in parental rearing style and every dimension of college students' citizen quality, while severe punishment has a significant negative correlation with multiple dimensions. 7. The dimension of emotional warmth and understanding of parental rearing styles can significantly positively predict the moral, cultural, legal and political qualities of citizens.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G641

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王斌;;新時(shí)期我國(guó)公民科學(xué)素養(yǎng)的構(gòu)建路徑[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2014年05期

2 單培勇;;國(guó)民素質(zhì)文化學(xué):國(guó)民素質(zhì)均衡發(fā)展需要的學(xué)理建構(gòu)[J];上海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年02期

3 辛濤;姜宇;劉霞;;我國(guó)義務(wù)教育階段學(xué)生核心素養(yǎng)模型的構(gòu)建[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年01期

4 金勇進(jìn);雷懷英;吳瀟;;公眾科學(xué)素養(yǎng)測(cè)評(píng)研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2011年10期

5 陳發(fā)俊;;我國(guó)公眾科學(xué)素養(yǎng)測(cè)評(píng)存在的問(wèn)題與對(duì)策[J];中國(guó)科技論壇;2009年05期

6 陸自榮;;自評(píng)量表測(cè)量大學(xué)生道德素質(zhì)初探[J];湖南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

7 李教明;;當(dāng)代大學(xué)生素質(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu)論[J];湖南城市學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

8 陳曉萍;;當(dāng)代大學(xué)生公民素質(zhì)現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查及對(duì)策探討[J];學(xué)校黨建與思想教育;2007年05期

9 羅秋蘿;;和諧社會(huì)與公民素質(zhì)[J];江蘇省社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

10 張民省;;公民素質(zhì)與公民教育[J];理論探索;2007年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1819259