本文關(guān)鍵詞： 大學(xué) 行政化 功利性 身份 治理　出處：《江蘇高教》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：由于政府部門與大學(xué)的邊界不清,大學(xué)內(nèi)部行政與教育學(xué)術(shù)的關(guān)系不順,導(dǎo)致行政力量而非教育學(xué)術(shù)力量主導(dǎo)著大學(xué)發(fā)展,進(jìn)而引發(fā)大學(xué)身份的混亂。因此,大學(xué)治理的首要目的在于匡正大學(xué)作為教育學(xué)術(shù)機(jī)構(gòu)的性質(zhì),即大學(xué)是以高深學(xué)問培養(yǎng)高級(jí)人才的教育機(jī)構(gòu),并圍繞這一主旨激發(fā)大學(xué)活力,提升包括教學(xué)、科研以及育人等能力在內(nèi)的教育力。大學(xué)治理的實(shí)踐中,需要遵循教育性原則、正義性原則和契約性原則,在保證大學(xué)治理效果的同時(shí),使治理原則本身也具有教育作用,實(shí)現(xiàn)大學(xué)對(duì)社會(huì)的改造與引領(lǐng)。
[Abstract]:Because the boundary between government department and university is not clear and the relationship between administration and education academic is not good, the administrative force, not the educational academic force, leads to the development of university, which leads to the confusion of university identity. The primary purpose of university governance is to correct the nature of the university as an educational academic institution, that is, university is an educational institution that trains senior talents with advanced knowledge, and stimulates the vitality of the university around this purpose, including teaching. In the practice of university governance, we should follow the educational principle, the principle of justice and the principle of contract, in order to ensure the effect of university governance at the same time. So that the principle of governance itself also has an educational role, to achieve the transformation and guidance of the university society.
【作者單位】： 天津大學(xué)教育學(xué)院;
【基金】：天津市教委社會(huì)科學(xué)重大項(xiàng)目“職業(yè)教育改革與發(fā)展的社會(huì)支持”(2014-ZD18) 天津市哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“工業(yè)化國(guó)家企業(yè)教育法律研究”(THJX15-001)
【分類號(hào)】：G647

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 楊秀坤;宋志彬;;關(guān)于高校輔導(dǎo)員工作理念及實(shí)踐原則的思考[J];南昌教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年10期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1493371