法律職業(yè)資格考試制度研究
[Abstract]:As an important part of the reform of the judicial system, the reform of the examination system of the legal profession qualification has been concerned by the judicial material circles and the academic circles. The legal qualification examination system replaces the judicial examination system is a way to select legal talents. The conditions of obtaining legal professional qualifications, the scope of examination and the conditions of professional access will be improved to meet the needs of social development. The author will introduce the legal qualification examination system of other countries and absorb advanced experience from it for reference in the reform of our country's current judicial examination system. At present, there are some defects in the current judicial examination system, such as the unscientific content of the judicial examination, and the author's reform suggestions are put forward. The first part introduces the legal professional qualification examination system of other countries, which provides reference and experience for the reform of the judicial examination system in our country, so as not to take more detours in the reform of the legal professional qualification examination system in our country, so as to reach the body of the middle school. The effect of western learning is to establish a legal qualification examination system in accordance with the national conditions of our country. The article also briefly introduces the evolution of our country's judicial examination system. The second part mainly introduces the management, examination mode, registration condition, operation mechanism and the connection with the relevant legal system of the judicial examination system in the past 15 years. In the third part, the author puts forward his own reform suggestions in view of the problems after the unification of the judicial examination system. It includes strengthening legislation, perfecting examination management system, establishing scientific and reasonable examination mode, adjusting registration conditions, and doing well the linking work between examination system and related system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:C975
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 熊云輝;;國(guó)家統(tǒng)一司法考試制度十年檢討——以統(tǒng)一性為對(duì)象[J];法治論壇;2012年03期
2 李紅海;;統(tǒng)一司法考試與合格法律人才的培養(yǎng)及選拔[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2012年04期
3 丁相順;;中國(guó)階段性司法考試模式的制度設(shè)計(jì)(上)[J];中國(guó)司法;2007年04期
4 劉俊;;法律職業(yè)化與司法考試的關(guān)系分析[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年03期
5 胡加祥;;為“司法考試”正名——兼析兩大法系主要國(guó)家法官、檢察官、律師的遴選制度[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期
6 郭興利;;試論法律教育的改革與法律職業(yè)[J];教育與職業(yè);2006年02期
7 蘇一星;中、德、美三國(guó)法學(xué)教育比較研究[J];教育研究;2004年11期
8 朱俊酬,盛祝玉,錢輝;健全我國(guó)司法考試制度的思考——兼評(píng)兩屆國(guó)家司法考試[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期
9 丁相順;司法考試制度模式比較與中國(guó)司法考試的制度創(chuàng)新[J];法律適用(國(guó)家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年04期
10 賀衛(wèi)方;統(tǒng)一司法考試二題[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年05期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 霍踐燁;中國(guó)國(guó)家司法考試制度的困境與出路[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年
2 徐海珠;國(guó)家司法考試制度法制化研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2011年
3 柳彥理;我國(guó)現(xiàn)行司法考試制度的架構(gòu)分析[D];山東大學(xué);2011年
4 謝璐凱;我國(guó)統(tǒng)一司法考試制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年
5 侯明飛;司法考試論[D];安徽大學(xué);2007年
6 馬明林;法律職業(yè)化與統(tǒng)一司法考試[D];四川大學(xué);2002年
,本文編號(hào):2308160
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/crjy/2308160.html