【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)村落是中國傳統(tǒng)文化的重要載體,凝聚著家族觀念、儒學(xué)思想、民族精神,是華夏子孫的共同文化遺產(chǎn)。當越來越多的傳統(tǒng)村落寄希望于旅游發(fā)展,妄圖一蹴而就,我們更需要思考村莊的未來發(fā)展。傳統(tǒng)村落發(fā)展的困境在于農(nóng)民主體性的喪失,農(nóng)村失去了精神,也就失去了農(nóng)民的留戀。對于當前農(nóng)村來說,極為迫切的任務(wù)是重建農(nóng)民的生活方式,而重建生活方式的一個重要方面就是更新塑造公共空間。目前傳統(tǒng)村落公共空間更新主要采用兩種方式,一是根據(jù)資料完全恢復(fù)傳統(tǒng)風(fēng)貌;二是采用城市設(shè)計的方法重新設(shè)計建造。這兩種方法都存在明顯弊端:前者脫離農(nóng)戶生活,后者不符合原有的傳統(tǒng)風(fēng)貌。本文通過對陽泉傳統(tǒng)村落公共空間進行實地調(diào)研,調(diào)查統(tǒng)計公共空間的類型、數(shù)量、位置并進行測繪,通過對村民、村委進行訪談,了解村莊與村民的需求,進而分析傳統(tǒng)村落公共空間現(xiàn)存的一些問題以及未來發(fā)展可能面臨的困境,總結(jié)提出針對傳統(tǒng)村落公共空間的保護更新策略。調(diào)研發(fā)現(xiàn),傳統(tǒng)村落的公共空間在文化傳統(tǒng)上存在相通性,同時受社會經(jīng)濟的影響,發(fā)展情況參差不齊,特別是近年來的現(xiàn)代公共空間建設(shè)深受區(qū)位經(jīng)濟的影響。在公共空間的發(fā)展更新中,主要存在的困境包括:傳統(tǒng)村落公共空間更新建設(shè)滯后無法適應(yīng)村民觀念和生活方式的改變;鄉(xiāng)村社會文化的變革導(dǎo)致傳統(tǒng)公共空間逐漸失落;現(xiàn)有公共空間存在功能喪失,村莊公共活動匱乏;村莊以旅游開發(fā)優(yōu)先,游客對村民日常生活產(chǎn)生干擾。針對農(nóng)戶的生產(chǎn)生活、民俗活動、精神文化需求及留守人員的安全與心理需求,結(jié)合案例分析,提出以下策略:保護和恢復(fù)傳統(tǒng)風(fēng)貌,保護鄉(xiāng)村文化;更新引入空間功能,盤活閑置資源;創(chuàng)造美好人居環(huán)境,提升村民生活質(zhì)量;引導(dǎo)村民轉(zhuǎn)變觀念,參與公共空間更新。本研究中選取辛莊村兩個地塊進行初步更新設(shè)計探索并進行歸納總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:As an important carrier of Chinese traditional culture, traditional villages are the common cultural heritage of Chinese people. As more and more traditional villages rely on tourism development, we need to think about the future development of villages. The dilemma of the development of traditional villages lies in the loss of farmers' subjectivity. For the current rural areas, the most urgent task is to rebuild the peasants' way of life, and an important aspect of the reconstruction of the way of life is to renew and shape the public space. At present, there are two main ways to renew the public space of the traditional villages, one is to completely restore the traditional style according to the data, the other is to redesign and build the public space by using the method of urban design. These two methods have obvious disadvantages: the former is divorced from the peasant life, the latter does not conform to the original traditional style. Based on the field investigation of public space in Yangquan traditional village, this paper investigates the type, quantity, location and mapping of public space, and through interviews with villagers and village committees, we can understand the needs of villages and villagers. Then it analyzes some problems existing in the traditional village public space and the difficulties that may be faced in the future development, and summarizes and puts forward the protection and renewal strategy for the traditional village public space. It is found that the public space of traditional villages is similar in cultural tradition and influenced by social economy, and its development is uneven. Especially, the construction of modern public space in recent years is deeply influenced by regional economy. In the development and renewal of public space, the main difficulties include: the traditional village public space reconstruction lags behind can not adapt to the change of villagers' concept and life style, the change of rural social culture leads to the gradual loss of traditional public space; The function of the existing public space is lost, the village public activities are scarce, the village takes the tourism development first, and the tourists interfere with the villagers' daily life. In view of farmers' production and life, folklore activities, spiritual and cultural needs, and safety and psychological needs of those left behind, the following strategies are put forward: to protect and restore traditional style and features, to protect rural culture, to renew and introduce spatial functions, Invigorate idle resources, create better living environment, improve villagers' quality of life, guide villagers to change their ideas and participate in the renewal of public space. In this study, two plots of Xinzhuang Village were selected for preliminary renewal design exploration and summarized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：TU982.29

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王桂林;;基于可持續(xù)理念的發(fā)達國家鄉(xiāng)村規(guī)劃和建設(shè)[J];世界農(nóng)業(yè);2016年12期

2 ;廣仁王廟環(huán)境整治工程[J];建筑學(xué)報;2016年08期

3 ;關(guān)于五龍廟環(huán)境整治項目的幾點討論[J];世界建筑;2016年07期

4 潘曦;衛(wèi)澤華;;“窯”與“房”的空間認知:從大lV民居談起[J];建筑與文化;2015年09期

5 鄭向群;陳明;;我國美麗鄉(xiāng)村建設(shè)的理論框架與模式設(shè)計[J];農(nóng)業(yè)資源與環(huán)境學(xué)報;2015年02期

6 夏宏嘉;王寶剛;張淑萍;;歐洲鄉(xiāng)村社區(qū)建設(shè)實態(tài)考察報告(一)——以德國、法國為例[J];小城鎮(zhèn)建設(shè);2015年04期

7 ;國務(wù)院辦公廳關(guān)于改善農(nóng)村人居環(huán)境的指導(dǎo)意見[J];城市規(guī)劃通訊;2014年11期

8 薛穎;權(quán)東計;張園林;楊擴;;農(nóng)村社區(qū)重構(gòu)過程中公共空間保護與文化傳承研究——以關(guān)中地區(qū)為例[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2014年05期

9 曹迎春;張玉坤;;“中國傳統(tǒng)村落”評選及分布探析[J];建筑學(xué)報;2013年12期

10 龐娟;;農(nóng)村公共空間研究的多學(xué)科視角回顧與展望[J];江西社會科學(xué);2013年09期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前4條

1 吳齊強;張惠婷;;“農(nóng)家書屋+電商”，加出了啥？[N];人民日報;2016年

2 左登基;;第三批中國傳統(tǒng)村落名單公布[N];中國旅游報;2014年

3 鐘端浪;;文化惠民共鑄幸福夢[N];江西日報;2014年

4 胡勘平;;望得見山、看得見水、記得住鄉(xiāng)愁[N];光明日報;2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李莉;中國傳統(tǒng)松柏文化研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：2214001