本文選題：方案設(shè)計(jì) + 設(shè)計(jì)思維　； 參考：《深圳大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：日常生活中,每個(gè)人的思維方式不盡相同,解決問題的途徑也各異。方案設(shè)計(jì)的目標(biāo)就是在諸多的約束條件的制約下,尋求解決錯(cuò)綜復(fù)雜的種種矛盾的最佳途徑。設(shè)計(jì)行為是受設(shè)計(jì)思維支配的,不同的設(shè)計(jì)者所呈現(xiàn)的設(shè)計(jì)效率、設(shè)計(jì)成果也有差異優(yōu)劣。正是由于設(shè)計(jì)者看待問題的思維角度不同,思考問題不是一個(gè)路子,解決問題不是一個(gè)途徑,造成師徒不能。所以,思維對于設(shè)計(jì)的影響萬分密切,對思維方法研究、探討、運(yùn)用能更有效的“打開設(shè)計(jì)”。設(shè)計(jì)師思維方式的異同,形成各種風(fēng)格流派,造就了多元的建筑風(fēng)格,在技術(shù)進(jìn)步的支持下,思維方式愈加開放,建筑風(fēng)格也愈加多元。眾所周知,在方案設(shè)計(jì)當(dāng)中所遇到的約束條件眾多,如何在眾多約束條件中“殺出一條血路”,就需要一些宏觀的思維去看待問題,正如現(xiàn)在衛(wèi)星或是無人機(jī)來用上帝的視角去觀察事物,往往能發(fā)現(xiàn)更多的可能性。系統(tǒng)論和結(jié)構(gòu)主義的方法科學(xué)所衍生出來的系統(tǒng)性思維與結(jié)構(gòu)性思維就是屬于宏觀思維的范疇。系統(tǒng)論和結(jié)構(gòu)主義都是眾多方法科學(xué)的一員,在辯證哲學(xué)領(lǐng)域的運(yùn)用相當(dāng)廣泛,多用于對事物的認(rèn)知、研究和剖析,兩者有所區(qū)別但又存在相當(dāng)緊密的聯(lián)系。本文通過對辯證哲學(xué)中的系統(tǒng)、結(jié)構(gòu)等相關(guān)概念及特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行歸納總結(jié),整合系統(tǒng)論與結(jié)構(gòu)主義衍生的系統(tǒng)性思維與結(jié)構(gòu)性思維方法,嘗試與設(shè)計(jì)行為相結(jié)合,通過對大量案例的辨析、整理以及筆者在研究生學(xué)習(xí)、生活當(dāng)中體會(huì),探討系統(tǒng)性思維與結(jié)構(gòu)性思維在建筑設(shè)計(jì)行為當(dāng)中的運(yùn)用和融合趨勢,闡述關(guān)于建筑設(shè)計(jì)思維運(yùn)用的看法。每個(gè)建筑師,都會(huì)有自己對于建筑的理解,也就是建筑觀,正如每個(gè)人都有自己的人生觀,左右著每個(gè)人的人生軌跡�！皥�(jiān)固、適用、美觀”是建筑基本原則,實(shí)現(xiàn)這個(gè)最終目標(biāo)的過程是每個(gè)建筑師建筑觀的體現(xiàn),推進(jìn)這個(gè)過程的關(guān)鍵則是建筑師的設(shè)計(jì)思維。建筑設(shè)計(jì)的發(fā)展是人類社會(huì)文明進(jìn)步發(fā)展的反映之一,也是思維推陳出新的寫照,人類思維方式的進(jìn)步才能推動(dòng)社會(huì)發(fā)展,因此對思維方式的研究探討,我們可以對事物本質(zhì)和事物之間的關(guān)系有更加深刻的了解,繼而可以探索更多的未知。
[Abstract]:In daily life, each person's way of thinking is different, the way of solving a problem is also different. The goal of the scheme design is to seek the best way to solve the complicated contradictions under the constraints of many constraints. Design behavior is governed by design thinking. Different designers present different design efficiency and design results have different advantages and disadvantages. It is just because designers think differently about problems, thinking about problems is not a way, solving problems is not a way, resulting in teachers and disciples can not. Therefore, the influence of thinking on design is very close. The similarities and differences of the designers' thinking style form various styles and schools, and bring up multiple architectural styles. With the support of technological progress, the mode of thinking becomes more open and the architectural style becomes more diversified. As we all know, there are many constraints in the design of the scheme. How to "kill a blood path" in the numerous constraints requires some macroscopic thinking to look at the problem. Just as satellites or drones now see things from God's perspective, they often discover more possibilities. Systematic thinking and structural thinking derived from systematics and structuralism belong to the category of macroscopic thinking. System theory and structuralism are members of many methods and sciences. They are widely used in the field of dialectical philosophy. They are mostly used in the cognition, research and analysis of things. By summarizing the related concepts and characteristics of dialectical philosophy, such as system and structure, this paper integrates the systematic thinking and structural thinking derived from system theory and structuralism, and attempts to combine with design behavior. Through the discrimination and analysis of a large number of cases, as well as the author's experience in graduate study and life, this paper discusses the application and fusion trend of systematic thinking and structural thinking in architectural design behavior. This paper expounds the views on the application of architectural design thinking. Every architect will have his own understanding of architecture, that is, architectural view, just as everyone has their own outlook on life, which determines everyone's life track. "sturdy, applicable and beautiful" is the basic principle of architecture. The process of realizing this ultimate goal is the embodiment of every architect's architectural view, and the key to promote this process is the architect's design thinking. The development of architectural design is one of the reflection of the progress of human social civilization, and it is also a reflection of thinking to bring forth the old and new. Only the progress of human thinking can promote social development, so the research on the mode of thinking is discussed. We can have a deeper understanding of the nature of things and the relationship between them, and then explore more unknowns.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：深圳大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：TU201

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙亞京;;論建筑設(shè)計(jì)的思維性思考[J];金田;2014年09期

2 汪江華;;形式—結(jié)構(gòu)美學(xué)與現(xiàn)代建筑[J];西部人居環(huán)境學(xué)刊;2014年02期

3 肖彥;孫暉;;如果城市并非樹形——亞歷山大與薩林加羅斯的城市設(shè)計(jì)復(fù)雜性理論研究[J];建筑師;2013年06期

4 杜玉華;;社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu):一個(gè)概念的再考評[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年08期

5 王侃;;“結(jié)構(gòu)主義”建筑探析[J];四川建筑科學(xué)研究;2007年05期

6 劉偉;;現(xiàn)代建筑空間結(jié)構(gòu)分析[J];科技經(jīng)濟(jì)市場;2007年07期

7 林德根;林世剛;;論系統(tǒng)思維方式的基本特征[J];哈爾濱市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

8 龔曉斌;結(jié)構(gòu)主義的語言學(xué)基礎(chǔ)[J];福建外語;2002年01期

9 白德懋;關(guān)于小區(qū)規(guī)模和結(jié)構(gòu)的探討[J];建筑學(xué)報(bào);1999年06期

10 許秀鳳,雷元新;論建筑工程中結(jié)構(gòu)與功能的辯證關(guān)系[J];五邑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);1999年01期

，

本文編號：2081510