【摘要】：在眾多的中國(guó)古代戲曲專科目錄中,敘錄體目錄僅有極少數(shù)幾部(如《錄鬼簿》、《傳奇匯考》、《今樂考證》等),《傳奇匯考》以其龐大的著錄規(guī)模,豐富的著錄內(nèi)容和相對(duì)完備的著錄體例頗引人注目�！秱髌鎱R考》共收集了265種雜劇、傳奇曲目的相關(guān)資料,其中包括20種雜劇和245種傳奇曲目。它是我國(guó)古代戲曲�？颇夸浘幾飞暇磬喈�(dāng)浩繁,內(nèi)容極為詳明的敘錄體目錄之一,具有集大成的特性,堪稱“扛鼎之作”,后人常以之比《四庫(kù)全書總目》。《傳奇匯考》著眼于考證劇情本事,窮其原委,考其源流,并大量征引歷史資料,指明劇作情節(jié)與歷史記載內(nèi)容之出入,征引資料涉及小說、筆記、話本、史書等無所不包,不僅有利于我們“辨章學(xué)術(shù),考鏡源流”,具有重要的史料研究?jī)r(jià)值,而且還具有不可替代的文獻(xiàn)學(xué)價(jià)值、戲曲史價(jià)值和文化史價(jià)值等。關(guān)于《傳奇匯考》的編纂者、編撰年代以及劇目來源等學(xué)界仍存在爭(zhēng)議,其所著錄的版本狀況相當(dāng)復(fù)雜,存在抄本、刻本、評(píng)點(diǎn)本、重訂本等多種版本,同時(shí)不同版本所收劇目提要數(shù)量不一,而且其中差錯(cuò)、脫漏滿紙。目前國(guó)內(nèi)流傳頗廣、最為常見、易見的是1994年書目文獻(xiàn)出版社據(jù)1914年古今書室刊本影印出版的版本。本文所用即為此本。由于很多版本流散于海內(nèi)外圖書館和私人藏家,這就給研究的深入造成很大的難度。本篇論文通過全面整理現(xiàn)有相關(guān)資料,對(duì)《傳奇匯考》進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的分析和研究,主要包括《傳奇匯考》的編纂、版本與流傳,《傳奇匯考》的著錄形式以及《傳奇匯考》的價(jià)值與不足三部分。同時(shí),《傳奇匯考》雖稱目錄之書,但其既無分類亦無索引,編排隨意且不講究,難于檢索,不便使用。因此本文在附錄部分對(duì)其進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充說明,具體包括《傳奇匯考》的目錄索引、《傳奇匯考》與《曲�？偰刻嵋纷髡咧洰愅怼ⅰ秱髌鎱R考》引書索引以及《傳奇匯考》與《曲�？偰刻嵋沸１容嬩浰牟糠謨�(nèi)容。一方面,通過目錄索引,使《傳奇匯考》便于檢索使用;另一方面,通過系統(tǒng)的分析,讓讀者對(duì)《傳奇匯考》有整體、理論性的認(rèn)識(shí)與了解。
[Abstract]:Among the numerous specialties of ancient Chinese opera, there are only a few of them (such as "Ghost Book", "Legend Hui examination", "textual Research of Today's Music", etc.). The abundant description and relatively complete description style are quite remarkable. The collection of 265 kinds of zaju and the relevant materials of legendary repertoire include 20 kinds of zaju and 245 kinds of legendary repertoire. It is one of the great volumes in the history of the specialized catalogue of ancient Chinese operas, and it is one of the most detailed catalogs in the history of narration. It has the characteristics of collection, and it can be called "carrying the tripod as a work". Later generations often compared to the general contents of the Siku-Quan book. The "Legend Collection examination" focuses on the textual research of the plot, its origin, and draws a large number of historical materials, pointing out the differences between the plot of the play and the contents of historical records, and referring to the material that relates to the novel. Notes, texts, history books and so on are not only beneficial to us, but also have important research value of historical materials, and also have irreplaceable value of philology, drama history and cultural history, and so on. There are still controversies about the compilers, the compilation age and the source of the repertoire, and the situation of the versions of the books is quite complicated, and there are many versions, such as transcripts, inscriptions, comments, revises, and so on. At the same time, the number of different versions of the repertoire received is different, and one of the errors, full of missing paper. At present the domestic circulation is quite wide, the most common, easy to see is the 1994 bibliography literature publishing house according to 1914 ancient and modern book room edition photocopy publication edition. The use of this article is for this purpose. Because many editions are scattered in libraries and private collectors at home and abroad, this makes the research very difficult. Through the comprehensive collation of the existing relevant data, this paper makes a systematic analysis and research on "legendary Hui examination", mainly including the compilation of "legendary Hui examination". There are three parts: edition and circulation, the description form of Legend Hui examination and the value and deficiency of Legend Hui examination. At the same time, although the book is called the book of catalogue, it has neither classification nor index, is arranged freely and does not pay attention to, is difficult to search, inconvenient to use. Therefore, in the appendix part of this paper, the supplementary explanation is given. It includes the catalogue index of legendary Hui examination, the table of similarities and differences of author's description between Legend Hui examination and Quhai General catalogue, the index of the quoted book of legendary Hui examination, and the contents of four parts of the comparison between the legendary Hui examination and the Quhai General catalogue. On the one hand, through the index of catalogue, it is easy to search and use, on the other hand, through systematic analysis, readers can have a whole and theoretical understanding of "legendary Hui examination".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：I207.37

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王文君;;南京圖書館藏丁氏八千卷樓抄本《傳奇匯考》考論[J];文獻(xiàn);2016年06期

2 石芳;;《傳奇匯考》作者考辨[J];浙江師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年03期

3 李慶;;兩種日本現(xiàn)存《傳奇匯考》抄本考[J];文化遺產(chǎn);2010年03期

4 孫書磊;;《書舶庸譚》所載日藏中國(guó)戲曲文獻(xiàn)考略[J];戲曲研究;2006年02期

5 杜海軍;;《曲�？偰俊酚袆e本——論《重訂曲�？偰俊贩菍�(duì)《揚(yáng)州畫舫錄》載《曲海目》的重訂[J];中國(guó)典籍與文化;2006年01期

6 陸萼庭;讀《曲海總目提要》札記[J];文學(xué)遺產(chǎn);2003年01期

7 淮茗;;董康和他的《曲�？偰刻嵋穂J];博覽群書;2002年03期

8 徐永明;管庭芬未曾重訂《曲�？偰俊穂J];中國(guó)典籍與文化;2001年02期

9 蔣寅;;東瀛讀書記[J];文獻(xiàn);1999年01期

10 鄧長(zhǎng)風(fēng);《書舶庸譚》中的戲曲史料二題美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)圖書館讀書札記之三十七[J];鐵道師院學(xué)報(bào);1997年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2237766