本文選題：遠(yuǎn)山堂劇品 + 名劇匯��； 參考：《戲曲藝術(shù)》2017年01期

【摘要】：祁彪佳《遠(yuǎn)山堂劇品》,黃裳稱其為"明劇品",即為品評明人雜劇而作;亦有不同意見,以為此書所評不限于明雜劇,故不能加"明"字。據(jù)祁彪佳的信函,祁氏曾用"明劇品"一名;又考祁理孫《奕慶藏書樓書目》中《名劇匯》詳目,原是祁彪佳為編纂《遠(yuǎn)山堂劇品》而匯集的雜劇集,故可論定《遠(yuǎn)山堂劇品》確是為品評明人雜劇而作;至于《劇品》中摻雜有部分元人雜劇,且有部分明人劇作未予著錄,原因是祁氏所見刊本即署為明人或元人所作的緣故。
[Abstract]:Qi Pu Jia Yuan Shan Tang Opera, Huang Chang called it "Ming Opera", that is, for the Ming Dynasty zaju, there are different views that this book is not limited to Ming zaju, so can not add the word "Ming". According to Qi's letter, Qi used the name "Ming Opera works". He also took a look at the "Collection of famous Drama" in Qi Li-sun 's Bibliography of the Yiqing Library. It was originally a collection of zaju operas compiled by Qi Yuan-tang. Therefore, it can be concluded that Yuan Shan Tang Drama is indeed written for the purpose of evaluating Ming people's zaju; as for "Drama", there are some Yuan Dynasty dramas mixed with others, and some Ming people's plays are not recorded, the reason is that Qi's periodical is written for Ming people or Yuan people.
【作者單位】： 中山大學(xué)中國古文獻(xiàn)研究所;
【基金】：國家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目“明代的雜劇輯刊與戲曲文學(xué)發(fā)展研究”(批準(zhǔn)號:13CZW043)階段研究成果
【分類號】：I207.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張玲;晚明紹興曲壇研究[D];廣西師范學(xué)院;2013年

，

本文編號：1843565