本文關(guān)鍵詞：朝鮮古代文壇“工拙”論的展開(kāi)與演進(jìn)　出處：《中央民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 朝鮮 工拙論 不論工拙 朝鮮族文學(xué)

【摘要】：朝鮮文人的"工拙"論,呈現(xiàn)出"不論工拙"的傾向,即相對(duì)詩(shī)歌的外在修辭而言,更加注重詩(shī)歌的內(nèi)在精神,把"言志""性情""德行"作為判斷工拙的三大指標(biāo),這與他們抵制文壇上出現(xiàn)的過(guò)度修飾詞句的風(fēng)氣,以及企圖把文學(xué)創(chuàng)作重新拉回儒家功能體系中的期望有關(guān)。同時(shí),他們還提出詩(shī)文創(chuàng)作工拙之間的轉(zhuǎn)換存在三種路徑,分別是天才、學(xué)識(shí)與窮達(dá),其中天才是上天賦予且不可逆轉(zhuǎn)的,學(xué)識(shí)是可以后天培養(yǎng)且能企及的,而窮達(dá)則強(qiáng)調(diào)人生際遇的窮變會(huì)讓詩(shī)文創(chuàng)作更加精進(jìn)。
[Abstract]:The Korean literati's theory of "industrial clumsiness" shows the tendency of "no matter what is wrong", that is, relative to the external rhetoric of poetry, it pays more attention to the inner spirit of poetry. Taking "speech", "disposition" and "virtue" as the three indexes of judgment, this is related to their resistance to the trend of excessive modifiers in the literary world. At the same time, they also put forward that there are three ways of the conversion between poetry and prose creation, namely, genius, learning and poverty. Among them, talent is endowed by heaven and irreversible, learning can be cultivated and can be achieved, while Chong Da emphasizes that the poverty of life will make the creation of poetry and prose more refined.
【作者單位】： 南昌大學(xué)人文學(xué)院中文系;
【基金】：韓東主持的江西省高校人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究青年基金項(xiàng)目“朝鮮時(shí)期詩(shī)學(xué)理論的構(gòu)建與嬗變研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):WGW162007)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：I207.9
【正文快照】： “工拙”論是一種文學(xué)批評(píng)方法,肇始于南北朝時(shí)期,其后在歷代文人的討論與闡釋下,逐漸成為中國(guó)古典文學(xué)中重要的批評(píng)觀念與理論。[1](P.116-120)事實(shí)上,“工拙”論在文學(xué)批評(píng)中的運(yùn)用并不局限于中國(guó),在深受中國(guó)文學(xué)理論影響的朝鮮古代文壇上也相當(dāng)盛行。關(guān)于朝鮮文壇的“工拙，

本文編號(hào)：1375508