本文關(guān)鍵詞：文與政之間:西漢今古文學(xué)之爭的另一種解讀——兼論爭立“古文”學(xué)并非始于劉歆　出處：《河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 今古文學(xué) 道術(shù) 新官學(xué) 政治

【摘要】：西漢今古文學(xué)之爭的性質(zhì)問題歷來眾說紛紜,學(xué)者或視之為學(xué)術(shù)義理之爭或視之為利祿之爭。細(xì)讀史料發(fā)現(xiàn)這樁學(xué)術(shù)公案背后有著錯(cuò)綜復(fù)雜的學(xué)術(shù)與政治背景。劉歆的初衷是為了解決六藝經(jīng)典散佚缺失導(dǎo)致"道術(shù)"分裂的問題,但卻卷入了漢哀帝與博士官學(xué)系統(tǒng)出身的儒學(xué)士大夫集團(tuán)之間的政治斗爭。儒學(xué)士大夫集團(tuán)欲借助壟斷經(jīng)典的解釋權(quán),牢牢占據(jù)道德制高點(diǎn),對漢哀帝的一系列政治舉措和意圖進(jìn)行批判和限制,哀帝則欲借增立"古文"于學(xué)官之機(jī)建立符合自身利益的新"官學(xué)",從而打破博士官學(xué)系統(tǒng)對"真理"的壟斷。又,學(xué)界歷來以劉歆建議增立"古文"學(xué)于學(xué)官為"古文"學(xué)派崛起之始,文章認(rèn)為爭立"古文"學(xué)于學(xué)官早有先聲,始于漢成帝時(shí)期博士平當(dāng)為由先秦史料匯聚而成的《樂記》請立學(xué)官之事。
[Abstract]:Nature of the Western Han Dynasty of ancient and modern literature contend for has always been regarded as scholars or Public opinions are divergent., academic argumentation of the dispute or as Cyril dispute. Read the historical data found behind the pile of academic and political background with academic koan. Liu Hsin's perplexing intention is to solve the classic six scattered lack of "Taoism" division problem but in between, the emperor and the official school system from Dr. Confucianism bureaucrats group politics. Confucianism bureaucrats group wants to use the power of interpretation of the classic monopoly, firmly occupy the moral high ground, a series of policies on the emperor's intention to criticize and treatment initiatives and restrictions, is trying to take advantage of emperor AI increase "Ancient Literature" in the new government official machine "learning" the interests of the establishment, so as to break the system of doctor officer "truth". It has always been a monopoly, Liu Hsin proposal to increase the "classical" learning from the government for the "classical" rise of academic school At the beginning, the dispute of the "classical" learning from the government had first began in the Han Emperor period, pre Qin historical grounds when Dr. Ping brought together < Music > please stand at last thing.

【作者單位】： 國家行政學(xué)院法學(xué)教研部;東北大學(xué)文法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：I206.2
【正文快照】： 漢哀帝建平元年(前6)劉歆向哀帝建言,欲將《左氏春秋》及《毛詩》《逸禮》《古文尚書》皆列于學(xué)官,遂拉開了所謂經(jīng)學(xué)史上著名的“今古文”之爭的序幕。關(guān)于此次爭論的性質(zhì)問題,傳統(tǒng)研究或認(rèn)為是學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)之爭[1]5,或認(rèn)為是雙方的利祿之爭[2]。然而,細(xì)讀史料發(fā)現(xiàn)這些觀點(diǎn)都有簡

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 楊天宇;略論漢代今古文經(jīng)學(xué)的斗爭與融合[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年02期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹海琴;張立克;;文與政之間:西漢今古文學(xué)之爭的另一種解讀——兼論爭立“古文”學(xué)并非始于劉歆[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2017年02期

2 范常喜;;鄭玄注《儀禮》形訛古文新證九則[J];孔子研究;2014年04期

3 壽佳琦;;簡論兩漢經(jīng)學(xué)的發(fā)展演變[J];文史博覽(理論);2013年02期

4 陳豪s，

本文編號：1368452