后股權(quán)分置時(shí)代上市公司并購(gòu)長(zhǎng)期績(jī)效研究
[Abstract]:The reform of split share structure has laid the foundation for market M & A, and the long backlog of M & A and reorganization has become increasingly apparent. After the split share structure era, can M & A of listed companies create value? What factors affect the market performance of M & A, and what are the underlying reasons behind M & A? These problems are important problems worth studying in the development of Chinese capital market at present. Based on the institutional background of China's capital market in the post-equity split era, this paper adopts the method of combining quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis, and draws lessons from the mature and widely used long-term performance evaluation method-cumulative excess return (BHAR),) in foreign countries. This paper discusses the characteristics of M & A transaction and the influence of ownership structure on long-term market performance. This paper first reviews the research and theories related to M & A, and then combines the institutional characteristics of different periods of China's capital market, especially the period of split share structure and the period of post-split share structure reform. This paper makes theoretical analysis and research hypothesis on M & A performance and its influencing factors. Then, this paper selects 946 samples from the mergers and acquisitions of listed companies in China's A-share market in 2006-2007, based on the principles of integrity and universality. First, use CSMAR and Wind information to calculate the BHAR; of these samples between 1 and 36 months after the acquisition. Then it classifies the samples from two aspects: the characteristics of M & A transaction and the ownership structure of the acquirer. Among them, the characteristics of M & A transaction include: equity nature, jurisdiction, association attribute, type of M & A, financing mode and payment method. The ownership attributes include: the background of the ultimate controller, the proportion of institutional investors holding shares and the proportion of the largest shareholders. According to these classifications, the samples are grouped, each group is compared to test the differences of M & A performance. Then, the characteristics of M & A transaction and equity attributes are taken as the explanatory variables and the multiple regression with BHAR. Through these empirical studies, the previous theoretical analysis and research hypotheses are tested. It is concluded that the long-term performance of M & A in the sample selected in this paper is negative, and the shareholder wealth of the acquirer suffers a loss. This result is not different from that before the split share structure reform, but the positive effect of the split share structure reform cannot be negated because of this. This result may be due to the sample interval in the bull market and bear market alternate stage, in the process of mergers and acquisitions due to the overvaluation of asset prices and serious overpayment, thus making the value of damage; The characteristics of M & A transactions have no significant direct effect on the long-term performance of M & A, while the ownership structure has a strong explanatory power on the long-term performance of M & A. Among them, the proportion of large shareholders holding shares is positively related to the long-term performance of M & A, which reflects the positive institutional effect of stock reform. Finally, the acquirers with non-state-owned background can obtain better long-term performance, which is related to the incentive degree of the listed companies. The proportion of institutional investors holding shares is negatively related to the long-term performance of mergers and acquisitions. This is not in line with the theoretical role of stock reform in promoting mergers and acquisitions. It is possible that the stock market and economic environment in the sample range led to this result.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號(hào)】:F832.51;F271;F224
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳茸;資產(chǎn)重組對(duì)我國(guó)上市公司績(jī)效的影響及實(shí)證分析[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2004年04期
2 李善民,朱滔,陳玉罡,曾昭灶,王彩萍;收購(gòu)公司與目標(biāo)公司配對(duì)組合績(jī)效的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年06期
3 高見,陳歆瑋;中國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)資產(chǎn)重組效應(yīng)分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2000年01期
4 蘭秋軍,馬超群,甘國(guó)君,吳建宏;中國(guó)股市弱有效嗎?——來(lái)自數(shù)據(jù)挖掘的實(shí)證研究[J];中國(guó)管理科學(xué);2005年04期
5 賴步連;楊繼東;周業(yè)安;;異質(zhì)波動(dòng)與并購(gòu)績(jī)效——基于中國(guó)上市公司的實(shí)證研究[J];金融研究;2006年12期
6 杜興強(qiáng);聶志萍;;中國(guó)上市公司并購(gòu)的短期財(cái)富效應(yīng)實(shí)證研究[J];證券市場(chǎng)導(dǎo)報(bào);2007年01期
7 陳信元,張?zhí)镉?資產(chǎn)重組的市場(chǎng)反應(yīng)——1997 年滬市資產(chǎn)重組實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1999年09期
8 李善民;朱滔;;管理者動(dòng)機(jī)與并購(gòu)績(jī)效關(guān)系研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2005年04期
9 鄧淑芳;姚正春;李志文;;收購(gòu)人層級(jí)與收購(gòu)后上市公司長(zhǎng)期績(jī)效[J];南開管理評(píng)論;2006年06期
10 范從來(lái),袁靜;成長(zhǎng)性、成熟性和衰退性產(chǎn)業(yè)上市公司并購(gòu)績(jī)效的實(shí)證分析[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年08期
,本文編號(hào):2359943
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/zhqtouz/2359943.html