【摘要】：并購(gòu)是實(shí)現(xiàn)生產(chǎn)和資本迅速集中的重要的資本運(yùn)作手段，目前，我國(guó)的上市公司也越來(lái)越重視利用這一手段來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)擴(kuò)大生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)規(guī)模和擴(kuò)張資本的目的。而學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)于并購(gòu)活動(dòng)是否創(chuàng)造價(jià)值，是否提升企業(yè)績(jī)效更為關(guān)注，對(duì)并購(gòu)績(jī)效的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了廣泛的研究。但是由于研究樣本、研究方法、研究事件窗口等的差別，國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者關(guān)于并購(gòu)績(jī)效的研究并沒(méi)有得出一致的研究結(jié)論。 我國(guó)由于地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的不平衡，東部、中部和西部地區(qū)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的進(jìn)程存在階梯狀的發(fā)展態(tài)勢(shì)，普遍存在東部先進(jìn)，西部較落后的情況。我國(guó)也是多民族的國(guó)家，民族地區(qū)的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化環(huán)境有著自身的特點(diǎn)，并且民族地區(qū)普遍集中于西部地區(qū)，這就突出了民族地區(qū)既具有自己的民族特色，又兼具西部市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)較為落后的特點(diǎn)。目前,我國(guó)關(guān)于上市公司并購(gòu)績(jī)效的研究，鮮有分別針對(duì)不同地區(qū)進(jìn)行分類研究的，甚至還沒(méi)發(fā)現(xiàn)對(duì)于民族地區(qū)上市公司并購(gòu)績(jī)效的研究，這與我國(guó)實(shí)際的地區(qū)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展程度的狀態(tài)不相符。市場(chǎng)化程度會(huì)在一定程度上影響并購(gòu)決策的科學(xué)性、并購(gòu)整合的效率等，進(jìn)而影響并購(gòu)的績(jī)效，因此，專門針對(duì)少數(shù)民族地區(qū)上市公司進(jìn)行并購(gòu)績(jī)效研究就非常有必要。 本文以2005年股權(quán)分置改革之后2006-2008年間民族地區(qū)發(fā)生并購(gòu)的上市公司作為樣本，采用財(cái)務(wù)指標(biāo)法，通過(guò)構(gòu)造綜合評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系，計(jì)算樣本公司并購(gòu)前后五年的財(cái)務(wù)指標(biāo)綜合得分和年均差值，并從并購(gòu)是否是關(guān)聯(lián)活動(dòng)、并購(gòu)雙方是否同屬于一個(gè)省份、并購(gòu)的行業(yè)相關(guān)性和收購(gòu)企業(yè)的股權(quán)集中度四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行具體分析，研究我國(guó)民族地區(qū)上市公司并購(gòu)績(jī)效的優(yōu)劣狀況，分析影響并購(gòu)績(jī)效的原因，并提出提高我國(guó)民族地區(qū)上市公司并購(gòu)績(jī)效的建議。 本文的實(shí)證研究結(jié)果表明：我國(guó)民族地區(qū)上市公司并購(gòu)活動(dòng)總體來(lái)說(shuō)，短期內(nèi)沒(méi)有產(chǎn)生并購(gòu)績(jī)效，而長(zhǎng)期來(lái)看，有顯著的并購(gòu)績(jī)效，，多數(shù)公司并購(gòu)后長(zhǎng)期業(yè)績(jī)得到提升；關(guān)聯(lián)并購(gòu)較非關(guān)聯(lián)并購(gòu)有較好的并購(gòu)績(jī)效；同屬地并購(gòu)短期并購(gòu)績(jī)效為負(fù)，長(zhǎng)期為正，而非同屬地并購(gòu)表現(xiàn)相反；相關(guān)并購(gòu)對(duì)經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)產(chǎn)生正效應(yīng)，非相關(guān)并購(gòu)產(chǎn)生負(fù)效應(yīng)；股權(quán)集中的上市公司并購(gòu)活動(dòng)的績(jī)效提升較為顯著。通過(guò)對(duì)研究結(jié)果的進(jìn)一步分析，筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)造成這一結(jié)果，既有外部環(huán)境的原因，也有企業(yè)自身管理的問(wèn)題，因此，針對(duì)產(chǎn)生的原因，提出了一些合理化建議。
[Abstract]:M & A is an important means of capital operation to realize rapid production and capital concentration. At present, listed companies in our country pay more and more attention to the use of this means to achieve the purpose of expanding the scale of production and operation and expanding capital. However, the academic circles pay more attention to whether M & A activities create value and whether to improve the performance of enterprises, and has carried on extensive research on the issue of M & A performance. However, due to the differences of research samples, research methods, research event window, domestic and foreign scholars on M & A performance research has not reached a consistent conclusion. Due to the imbalance of regional economic development, the process of market economy in the eastern, central and western regions of China has a ladder state of development, and there is generally the situation that the eastern part is advanced and the western part is relatively backward. Our country is also a multi-ethnic country, and the political, economic and cultural environment of the ethnic areas has its own characteristics, and the ethnic areas are generally concentrated in the western region, which highlights that the ethnic areas have their own national characteristics. Also has the western market economy relatively backward characteristic. At present, the research on the performance of M & A of listed companies in China is seldom classified in different regions, or even the research on the performance of M & A of listed companies in ethnic regions has not been found. This with our country actual area market economy development degree of state does not accord with. The degree of marketization will affect the scientific nature of M & A decision and the efficiency of M & A integration to some extent, and then affect the performance of M & A. Therefore, it is very necessary to study the M & A performance of listed companies in minority areas. This paper takes the listed companies in the minority areas from 2006 to 2008 after the reform of the split share structure in 2005 as a sample, adopts the financial index method, and constructs a comprehensive evaluation index system. To calculate the comprehensive score and average annual difference of the financial indicators of the sample companies before and after M & A, and from whether the M & A is a related activity, and whether both sides belong to the same province, This paper makes a specific analysis of the industry relevance of M & A and the ownership concentration of the purchasing enterprises, studies the merits and demerits of the M & A performance of listed companies in the minority areas of China, and analyzes the reasons that affect the M & A performance. And put forward some suggestions to improve the M & A performance of listed companies in minority areas of our country. The empirical results of this paper show that: generally speaking, there is no M & A performance in the short term, but in the long run, there are significant M & A performance, and the long-term performance of most companies has been improved after M & A; Relative M & A has better M & A performance than non-affiliated M & A; Short-term M & A performance is negative, long term M & A performance is negative, but not affiliated M & A performance is opposite; related M & A has positive effect on business performance, non-related M & A has negative effect; The performance of M & A of listed companies with concentrated equity is more significant. Through the further analysis of the research results, the author finds that the reasons for this result are not only the external environment but also the problems of the enterprise's own management. Therefore, some reasonable suggestions are put forward in view of the causes.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F832.51;F271;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖圓;;我國(guó)上市公司并購(gòu)績(jī)效的實(shí)證分析[J];中國(guó)城市經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年09期

2 潘瑾,陳宏民;上市公司關(guān)聯(lián)并購(gòu)的績(jī)效與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2005年01期

3 宋獻(xiàn)中;周昌仕;;股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)、大股東變更與收購(gòu)公司競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)──來(lái)自中國(guó)上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2007年05期

4 王化成,任慶和;上市公司關(guān)聯(lián)重組與利潤(rùn)操縱[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

5 李善民;周小春;;公司特征、行業(yè)特征和并購(gòu)戰(zhàn)略類型的實(shí)證研究[J];管理世界;2007年03期

6 唐建新;陳冬;;地區(qū)投資者保護(hù)、企業(yè)性質(zhì)與異地并購(gòu)的協(xié)同效應(yīng)[J];管理世界;2010年08期

7 鄧建平;曾勇;何佳;;關(guān)聯(lián)并購(gòu)重組:根源與后果[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2011年08期

8 黃興孿;沈維濤;;掏空或支持——來(lái)自我國(guó)上市公司關(guān)聯(lián)并購(gòu)的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2006年12期

9 洪道麟;劉力;熊德華;;多元化并購(gòu)、企業(yè)長(zhǎng)期績(jī)效損失及其選擇動(dòng)因[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2006年05期

10 吳世農(nóng);我國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)效率的分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1996年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 韋省民;張愛榮;;上市公司并購(gòu)績(jī)效持續(xù)性研究[A];2004年中國(guó)管理科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 魏向東;中國(guó)東部和西部地區(qū)上市公司并購(gòu)績(jī)效比較研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2004年

2 姬文龍;我國(guó)上市公司并購(gòu)績(jī)效及其影響因素的實(shí)證分析[D];暨南大學(xué);2006年

本文編號(hào)：2336461