【摘要】：本研究探討中國政府在保持公共機構債務低成本方面從金融壓抑中得到多大效益。如果金融抑制被定義為儲蓄實際負利率,于中國家庭最為明顯。在2003至2012年期間中國家庭存款實際利率為負百分之零點六。 政府從金融抑制中節(jié)省的成本計算方法為實際負利率乘以公共機構債務。數(shù)據(jù)顯示在1998至2012期間,一共六年(2003,2006,2007,2009,2010,2012)中國的公共機構債務的實際利率為負值；中國政府總共獲益了1.706兆元人民幣,這是相等于國民總收入的百分之三點九。換言之,金融抑制于降低中國公共機構債務的角色并不算顯注。
[Abstract]:This study explores how much the Chinese government has benefited from financial repression in keeping public institutions' debt low-cost. If financial repression is defined as the real negative interest rate on savings, it is most evident in Chinese households. The real interest rate on household deposits in China between 2003 and 2012 was minus 0.6%. The government's savings from financial repression are calculated by multiplying real negative interest rates by public agency debt. The figures show that between 1998 and 2012, the real interest rate on China's public agency debt was negative for six years (2003,2006 / 2009 / 2010 / 2012); the Chinese government benefited a total of 1.706 trillion yuan, or 3.9% per cent of total Yu Guomin revenues. In other words, the role of financial repression in reducing the debt of China's public institutions is not obvious.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F812.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 ;Financial Intermediation Development and Economic Growth:Does the Chinese Counterexample Exist?[J];China & World Economy;2010年05期

，

本文編號：2181726