本文關(guān)鍵詞： 資本賬戶開放 外匯市場風(fēng)險 銀行系統(tǒng)風(fēng)險 資產(chǎn)泡沫風(fēng)險　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：經(jīng)濟、金融一體化趨勢推進全球經(jīng)濟迅速發(fā)展和各國金融開放,但同時也加劇了各國金融風(fēng)險甚至金融危機發(fā)生概率。1997年東南亞金融危機和2008年全球金融危機的發(fā)生,使得政府一直對資本賬戶開放采取較為謹慎的態(tài)度,中國的資本賬戶開放進程也一再受到危機的影響而放緩。隨著中國國際化程度的提高及人民幣國際化進程的加速,開放人民幣資本賬戶成為一種必然趨勢,但如何控制好國內(nèi)金融風(fēng)險,有效地防范金融危機的發(fā)生,安全實現(xiàn)資本賬戶開放帶來的利益成為中國學(xué)術(shù)界和決策層必須要考慮的問題。為此,本文深入研究資本賬戶開放與金融風(fēng)險的互動關(guān)系,選取外匯市場風(fēng)險、銀行系統(tǒng)風(fēng)險和資產(chǎn)泡沫風(fēng)險三類金融風(fēng)險,在理論和實證上驗證了中國資本賬戶開放與這三類金融風(fēng)險的互動關(guān)系。 本文的主要內(nèi)容是：第一章主要闡述選題背景、意義和研究內(nèi)容、方法等；第二章一方面介紹本文基本概念,另一方對資本賬戶開放與金融風(fēng)險關(guān)系的相關(guān)文獻進行述評；第三章描述中國資本賬戶開放和三類金融風(fēng)險現(xiàn)狀,并分析兩者互動關(guān)系機制；第四章對中國資本賬戶開放與三類金融風(fēng)險的互動關(guān)系做實證分析。實證結(jié)論是：資本賬戶開放水平越高,越容易加劇國內(nèi)外匯市場風(fēng)險、銀行系統(tǒng)風(fēng)險與資產(chǎn)泡沫風(fēng)險；而外匯市場風(fēng)險、銀行系統(tǒng)風(fēng)險與資產(chǎn)泡沫風(fēng)險的加劇反過來又會延緩資本賬戶開放進程。 本文的主要貢獻在于,將宏觀金融風(fēng)險的范圍限定,只選取三類主要的金融風(fēng)險即外匯市場風(fēng)險、銀行系統(tǒng)風(fēng)險和資產(chǎn)泡沫風(fēng)險作為研究對象,然后分別將其量化,同時將資本賬戶開放程度量化,將兩者之間進行實證分析。但從理論上看,本文的研究并沒有基于一個系統(tǒng)理論模型,對資本賬戶開放與三類金融風(fēng)險互動關(guān)系進行推導(dǎo),理論說服力不夠；從方法上看,對三類風(fēng)險指數(shù)的構(gòu)建依賴借鑒國內(nèi)外文獻的方法,較少結(jié)合我國具體的實際情況對指數(shù)測算公式進行改進。
[Abstract]:The economic trend of financial integration, to promote the rapid development of the global economy and international financial openness, but at the same time also increased the probability of.1997 occurrence of financial risk even financial crisis in the Southeast Asian financial crisis and the 2008 global financial crisis, the government has to open the capital account to take a more cautious attitude, China capital account liberalization also has been in crisis the effect of slow. With the improvement of the degree of internationalization and China to accelerate the process of internationalization of the RMB, the RMB capital account has become an inevitable trend, but how to control the financial risk of domestic, effectively prevent the occurrence of financial crisis, bring about safety of capital account liberalization become the interests of Chinese academics and policymakers must consider the problem this paper. Therefore, in-depth study of the interactive relationship between capital account liberalization and the financial risk, select foreign currencies The field of risk, the risk of bank system and the risk of a property bubble, three types of financial risk, in theory and practice to verify the relationship between capital account liberalization and Chinese of these three types of financial risk.
The main contents of this paper are: the first chapter describes the background, significance and research contents and methods; the second chapter introduces the basic concepts of this paper on the one hand, the other party related literature on capital account liberalization and financial risk relationship are reviewed; the third chapter describes the Chinese capital account opening and the three kinds of financial risk status, and analysis the mechanism of the relationship between interaction; the fourth chapter of Chinese interaction between capital account liberalization and three types of financial risk do the empirical analysis. The conclusion is: the higher the level of capital account liberalization, more easily exacerbate the domestic foreign exchange market risk, the risk of bank system and asset bubble risk; foreign exchange market risk, the risk of bank system and the risk of asset bubbles increase in turn will delay the opening of capital account.
The main contribution of this paper is the scope of macro financial risk is limited, only selected the three main types of financial risk is the risk of foreign exchange market, the banking system risk and asset bubble risk as the research object, and then to quantify the degree of capital account openness between quantitative empirical analysis. But from the view of theory in this paper, the research is not a system based on the model, to derive the capital account opening and the three kinds of financial risk interaction, theory is not convincing enough; in terms of the method, three kinds of risk index of the construction depends on the reference method of literature at home and abroad, combining the actual situation of our country is less specific to improve the index calculation formula.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F832.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 藍發(fā)欽;中國資本項目開放的測度[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期

2 付江濤,王方華;貨幣危機預(yù)警指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建及實證分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟研究;2004年12期

3 倪權(quán)生;潘英麗;;G20國家資本賬戶開放度比較研究——基于改進的約束式測度法[J];世界經(jīng)濟研究;2009年02期

4 陳守東;馬輝;穆春舟;;中國金融風(fēng)險預(yù)警的MS-VAR模型與區(qū)制狀態(tài)研究[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年01期

5 王銳;;資本項目可兌換的國際經(jīng)驗借鑒[J];吉林金融研究;2011年01期

6 杜金岷;李繼偉;;資本項目開放中的銀行危機預(yù)警研究[J];暨南學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期

7 曹勇;與資本項目開放有關(guān)的幾個問題的再思考[J];金融研究;2004年04期

8 劉仁伍;劉華;黃禮健;;新興市場國家的國際資本流動與雙危機模型擴展[J];金融研究;2008年04期

9 馬駿;;人民幣離岸市場與資本項目開放[J];金融發(fā)展評論;2012年04期

10 孫立堅,劉志剛,王兆旭;資本賬戶開放的動態(tài)經(jīng)濟效應(yīng)[J];世界經(jīng)濟文匯;2002年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李繼偉;我國資本項目開放中的風(fēng)險預(yù)警研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

2 張雪麗;開放經(jīng)濟條件下的中國金融穩(wěn)定研究[D];東北財經(jīng)大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1444530