本文關(guān)鍵詞：基于文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所的藝術(shù)品金融化模式研究　出處：《陜西師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所 藝術(shù) 金融

【摘要】：藝術(shù)品金融化模式與市場化形態(tài)的路徑對(duì)應(yīng),可以遵循藝術(shù)資源—商品化—產(chǎn)權(quán)化—資產(chǎn)化—資本化(證券化)的發(fā)展演化過程逐步展開。本文通過藝術(shù)品產(chǎn)權(quán)化對(duì)應(yīng)藝術(shù)授權(quán)和藝術(shù)品投資產(chǎn)權(quán)組合、藝術(shù)品資產(chǎn)化對(duì)應(yīng)藝術(shù)銀行和藝術(shù)品質(zhì)押融資、藝術(shù)品資本化對(duì)應(yīng)藝術(shù)基金和藝術(shù)品信托、藝術(shù)品證券化對(duì)應(yīng)基于經(jīng)營收益權(quán)的藝術(shù)品權(quán)益拆分和藝術(shù)期權(quán)等多種業(yè)務(wù)模式的分析,理清文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所框架下藝術(shù)品金融化的脈絡(luò),對(duì)基于文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所的藝術(shù)品金融化模式的選擇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和體系構(gòu)建提出全新的見解,同時(shí)對(duì)文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所的業(yè)務(wù)轉(zhuǎn)型和陜西的藝術(shù)金融發(fā)展得出有益啟示。 通過金融化模式運(yùn)營促成產(chǎn)權(quán)交易機(jī)制作為社會(huì)化、大眾化的資本市場,在藝術(shù)品交易體系中建立作為核心和基礎(chǔ)的平臺(tái)地位,以文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所為中心,綜合銀、證、信、保等金融機(jī)構(gòu)推動(dòng)構(gòu)建藝術(shù)品確權(quán)、鑒定、評(píng)估、定價(jià)的信用價(jià)值流轉(zhuǎn)機(jī)制。同時(shí),探討后份額化時(shí)代文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所藝術(shù)品業(yè)務(wù)模式可能性,一是基于經(jīng)營收益權(quán)的藝術(shù)品證券化,一是藝術(shù)期權(quán)形式的金融衍生工具產(chǎn)品。 本研究的特色和創(chuàng)新在于市場化形態(tài)各階段與藝術(shù)品金融化模式的對(duì)應(yīng),在文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所框架下理清藝術(shù)品金融化的發(fā)展脈絡(luò),以及由此推斷的更高形式的金融化方式的可行性,即基于收益權(quán)的資產(chǎn)證券化和金融衍生工具業(yè)務(wù)。根據(jù)現(xiàn)狀論述和案例研究,梳理藝術(shù)品金融化業(yè)務(wù)運(yùn)作模式,分析提出文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所藝術(shù)品金融化模式選擇和體系建立的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),對(duì)文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所藝術(shù)金融業(yè)務(wù)轉(zhuǎn)型及發(fā)展方向提供有價(jià)值的結(jié)論和建議。 考量市場交易原則、產(chǎn)權(quán)歸屬程度、信息披露要求、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范措施和資產(chǎn)配置功能五個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),基于文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所的藝術(shù)品金融化體系構(gòu)建可以通過第二價(jià)格密封拍賣機(jī)制、藝術(shù)品投資產(chǎn)權(quán)組合、藝術(shù)租賃融資、藝術(shù)品消費(fèi)信貸等模式和途徑,推動(dòng)藝術(shù)品市場金融化由生產(chǎn)型、投資型金融到消費(fèi)型金融過渡和轉(zhuǎn)變,充分發(fā)揮資本市場融通資金、擴(kuò)大市場規(guī)模、提高交易活躍程度、優(yōu)化資源配置效率的功用。
[Abstract]:The pattern of art financialization corresponds to the path of marketization. The development and evolution of art resources, commercialization, property right, assets and capitalization (securitization) can be followed step by step. Art capital corresponds to art bank and art pledge financing, art capitalization corresponds to art fund and art trust. Art securitization corresponds to the analysis of various business models, such as the split of art rights based on the right of operating income and the art option, to clarify the context of the financialization of art under the framework of the cultural property exchange. This paper puts forward a new opinion on the choice standard and system construction of the art financialization model based on the cultural property right exchange, at the same time, it gives a beneficial enlightenment to the business transformation of the cultural property right exchange and the development of art finance in Shaanxi. Through the operation of financialization mode, the mechanism of property right transaction, as a socialized and popular capital market, is established as the core and foundation of the art trading system, with the cultural property exchange as the center. Comprehensive banking, securities, credit, insurance and other financial institutions to promote the establishment of the right to art, appraisal, evaluation, pricing of credit value flow mechanism. This paper discusses the possibility of the art business model of the cultural property exchange in the post-quota era, one is the securitization of art based on the right of operating income, the other is the financial derivative product in the form of art option. The characteristics and innovation of this study lie in the correspondence between the various stages of the market-oriented form and the model of art financialization, and in the framework of the cultural property exchange, it clarifies the development context of the financialization of works of art. And the feasibility of a higher form of financialization, I. E. asset securitization and financial derivatives business based on income rights. Combing the operation mode of the art financialization business, this paper analyzes and puts forward the standards for the choice of the art financialization mode and the establishment of the system in the cultural property rights exchange. It provides valuable conclusions and suggestions for the transformation and development direction of art finance business of cultural property exchange. Consider the market transaction principle, ownership of property rights, information disclosure requirements, risk prevention measures and asset allocation function of five standards. The construction of art financialization system based on cultural property exchange can be done through the second price sealed auction mechanism, art investment portfolio, art leasing financing, art consumption credit and so on. We will promote the transition and transformation of the art market from production-type, investment-oriented finance to consumption-oriented finance, give full play to capital market financing, expand the scale of the market, and increase the level of trading activity. Optimize the efficiency of resource allocation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F832.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 皇甫曉濤;賴章德;;關(guān)于文化產(chǎn)權(quán)交易的理論思考[J];中國美術(shù);2011年06期

2 游春;胡才龍;;發(fā)展藝術(shù)品金融產(chǎn)品份額化交易相關(guān)問題探討[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2011年33期

3 方翔;;國有產(chǎn)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓行為必須進(jìn)一步規(guī)范[J];產(chǎn)權(quán)導(dǎo)刊;2010年08期

4 趙書波;;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展方向——產(chǎn)權(quán)交易[J];產(chǎn)權(quán)導(dǎo)刊;2010年12期

5 曾璐;;淺議國有產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中的定價(jià)問題[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年08期

6 白雪;;淺論藝術(shù)品收藏與投資的理性把握[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)(下半月);2007年04期

7 劉翔宇;;我國藝術(shù)品市場金融化趨向及藝術(shù)品金融特點(diǎn)分析[J];東岳論叢;2012年05期

8 魏成龍;鄭志;張潔梅;魏榮桓;;國有資本產(chǎn)權(quán)市場的政府監(jiān)管對(duì)策研究[J];發(fā)展研究;2011年11期

9 沈立群;;產(chǎn)權(quán)交易市場制度更趨規(guī)范[J];上海國資;2010年01期

10 林天強(qiáng);;深化文化體制改革中的文交所發(fā)展與規(guī)范[J];中國美術(shù);2011年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1423292