【摘要】：當(dāng)前我國社會(huì)組織制度發(fā)展實(shí)現(xiàn)了由"雙重管理"向"激勵(lì)培育"的意向性轉(zhuǎn)變,社會(huì)組織自主性空間獲得迅速拓展,繼而觸動(dòng)了社會(huì)組織制度執(zhí)行生態(tài)的變化。公益創(chuàng)投制度的持續(xù)推進(jìn),客觀上改變了社會(huì)組織的生存環(huán)境,也引發(fā)了社會(huì)組織制度參與行動(dòng)策略的調(diào)整。文章以當(dāng)前各地迅速興起的公益創(chuàng)投制度為例,呈現(xiàn)了社會(huì)組織在創(chuàng)投制度適應(yīng)的過程中,歷經(jīng)了試探性規(guī)則拒斥、主動(dòng)性制度嵌入、破壞性制度反噬三個(gè)策略階段。每一階段的策略調(diào)整,其背后暗含著社會(huì)組織對創(chuàng)投制度理性適應(yīng)的邏輯以及自身成長現(xiàn)實(shí)需要的雙重考量。在此基礎(chǔ)上,文章進(jìn)一步討論了自主性邊界的議題,提出社會(huì)組織行動(dòng)技術(shù)自主性一旦沖破制度本身所能承受的限閾,也將造成破壞性制度后果。
[Abstract]:At present, the development of social organization system in our country has realized the change of intention from "double management" to "encouragement and cultivation", and the space of social organization autonomy has been expanded rapidly, and then the ecological change of the execution of social organization system has been affected. The continuous promotion of the public welfare venture capital system has objectively changed the living environment of the social organization, and also led to the adjustment of the social organization system participating in the action strategy. Taking the rapid rise of the public welfare venture capital system as an example, this paper presents the three strategic stages of social organization in the process of adapting to the venture capital system, that is, exploratory rule rejection, initiative institution embedding and destructive system anti-phantom. The strategy adjustment in each stage implies the logic of the rational adaptation of the social organization to the venture capital system and the double consideration of the realistic needs of its own growth. On this basis, the paper further discusses the issue of autonomy boundary, and points out that once the technical autonomy of social organizations breaks through the threshold that the institution itself can bear, it will also result in destructive institutional consequences.
【作者單位】： 河海大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;蘇州科技大學(xué)人文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“政府購買社會(huì)組織服務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)識(shí)別與防范機(jī)制研究”(16CSH064) 2015年中央高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)重點(diǎn)培育專項(xiàng)“公益創(chuàng)投基層服務(wù)成效及組織運(yùn)作邏輯”(2015B24914) 江蘇省高校2015年度第四期“333工程”科研資助項(xiàng)目“公益創(chuàng)投基層服務(wù)成效及組織運(yùn)作邏輯”(BRA2015404)
【分類號(hào)】：D632.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 張旭升;張孝廷;;服務(wù)投遞者參與政府購買居家養(yǎng)老服務(wù)的動(dòng)機(jī)、行動(dòng)策略及政策建議[J];西北人口;2013年01期

2 周秀平;;NGO參與重大危機(jī)應(yīng)對的三層行動(dòng)策略[J];天府新論;2011年02期

3 朱健剛;賴偉軍;;“不完全合作”:NGO聯(lián)合行動(dòng)策略 以“5·12”汶川地震NGO聯(lián)合救災(zāi)為例[J];社會(huì);2014年04期

4 白關(guān)峰;鐘靜靜;;農(nóng)村扶貧場域中精英行動(dòng)策略——以寧夏固原市X村扶貧實(shí)踐為例[J];前沿;2014年Z2期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 付聰;多邊資源結(jié)構(gòu)下社會(huì)組織行動(dòng)策略研究[D];上海大學(xué);2016年

2 曹星;依附式自主：非政府組織的行動(dòng)策略[D];南京大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2433475