【摘要】：根據(jù)國(guó)際經(jīng)驗(yàn),在以工業(yè)化和城鎮(zhèn)化為主要標(biāo)志的現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程中,由于需要興建大批工業(yè)設(shè)施和城市基礎(chǔ)公共服務(wù)配套設(shè)施,極易爆發(fā)眾多類型的鄰避沖突。處在急劇社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的中國(guó)也無法避免這一國(guó)際共性問題。接連爆發(fā)的鄰避沖突事實(shí)證明,中國(guó)已進(jìn)入鄰避運(yùn)動(dòng)時(shí)代,在未來的一段時(shí)期內(nèi),這類沖突爆發(fā)的數(shù)量和規(guī)模將呈現(xiàn)上升態(tài)勢(shì)。鄰避沖突是民眾因鄰避設(shè)施風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性不公平分配產(chǎn)生的沖突,鄰避沖突的爆發(fā)不僅會(huì)導(dǎo)致某一地區(qū)社會(huì)秩序的混亂,更會(huì)對(duì)社會(huì)整體的良序運(yùn)行與和諧發(fā)展產(chǎn)生極為不利的影響。同時(shí),我們更需要清楚認(rèn)識(shí)到,并不是鄰避設(shè)施的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性巨大到難以化解,而是民眾對(duì)地方政府在興建鄰避設(shè)施的態(tài)度和行為上表現(xiàn)出不認(rèn)可和焦慮感,這已嚴(yán)重影響到地方政府公信力和權(quán)威的樹立。因此本文探究鄰避沖突的社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn),期望在一個(gè)利益不斷分化,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分配更加難以平衡的社會(huì),通過對(duì)鄰避沖突社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的治理,最大限度地避免鄰避沖突并使官民關(guān)系在鄰避設(shè)施的興建過程中更加和諧。本文共分為六章。第一章緒論,交代本文的選題背景與研究意義,分別對(duì)鄰避沖突和社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的國(guó)內(nèi)外研究文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行梳理與評(píng)析,介紹本選題的研究方法,指出文章可能的創(chuàng)新和存在的不足。第二章概念界定和理論基礎(chǔ),分別對(duì)鄰避設(shè)施與鄰避沖突、社會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)這兩組核心概念進(jìn)行了界定,明確了研究對(duì)象,以風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)理論為背景和主要分析理論、以民主協(xié)商理論和善治理論為基礎(chǔ)理論,奠定了全文分析的理論基礎(chǔ)。第三章通過對(duì)當(dāng)前中國(guó)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型特點(diǎn)的分析,指出了中國(guó)逐步步入高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的現(xiàn)狀。具體到鄰避問題上則是“壓縮式”的現(xiàn)代化積累的眾多風(fēng)險(xiǎn)儼然成為當(dāng)下鄰避沖突頻發(fā)的重要誘因,表現(xiàn)為環(huán)境風(fēng)險(xiǎn)有組織地不負(fù)責(zé)任、技術(shù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)引發(fā)的技術(shù)恐懼癥、民眾過度風(fēng)險(xiǎn)認(rèn)知引發(fā)的焦慮感以及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)-信任因果循環(huán)下的地方政府信任危機(jī),以此清楚地交代了鄰避沖突社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)生成的時(shí)代背景。第四章和第五章是本文的核心章節(jié),分別從風(fēng)險(xiǎn)生產(chǎn)、積累、擴(kuò)散、突變與再生產(chǎn)這五個(gè)方面梳理了鄰避沖突社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的演進(jìn)路徑,并在生成機(jī)理的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了鄰避沖突社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的五種類型,主要是決策型社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、公正型社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、利益訴求型社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言型社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)以及治理型社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。第六章在前文分析的基礎(chǔ)上提出了鄰避沖突社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的治理策略,主要從消弭鄰避設(shè)施的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性和鄰避沖突的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了對(duì)癥下藥,具體包括樹立風(fēng)險(xiǎn)意識(shí),尊重和保障民眾權(quán)利和利益,建立包括公民參與機(jī)制、信息共享機(jī)制、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溝通機(jī)制等鄰避問題協(xié)商制度,強(qiáng)化地方政府的服務(wù)理念提高回應(yīng)性等方面提供了建議。
[Abstract]:According to international experience, in the process of modernization with industrialization and urbanization as the main symbol, because of the need to build a large number of industrial facilities and urban basic public service facilities, it is easy to break out many kinds of adjacent conflicts. In the rapid social transition period, China can not avoid this common international problem. The fact that China has entered the era of neighbor avoidance has been proved by the fact that the number and scale of these conflicts will increase in the coming period. Conflict avoidance is a conflict caused by the unfair distribution of adjacent facilities. The outbreak of neighborhood conflict will not only lead to the chaos of social order in a certain area, but also have an extremely adverse impact on the good order and harmonious development of the whole society. At the same time, we need to clearly realize that it is not that the risks of the adjacent facilities are too great to resolve, but that the public shows a sense of disapproval and anxiety about the attitude and behavior of the local government in the construction of the adjacent facilities. This has seriously affected the establishment of credibility and authority of local governments. Therefore, this paper explores the social stability risk of neighboring conflict avoidance, hoping that in a society where interests are constantly divided and risk distribution is more difficult to balance, we can manage the social stability risk of neighboring conflict avoidance society. Avoid conflict to the maximum extent and make the relationship between government and people more harmonious in the process of building adjacent facilities. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter introduces the background and significance of the topic, combs and comments the domestic and foreign research literature on the risk of conflict avoidance and social stability, and introduces the research methods of this topic. The article points out the possible innovation and shortcomings. The second chapter defines the concept and theoretical basis, defines the two core concepts of adjacent facilities and conflict avoidance, social risk and social stability risk, defines the research object, taking the risk society theory as the background and the main analysis theory. On the basis of democratic consultation theory and good governance theory, the theoretical foundation of full text analysis is established. The third chapter points out the current situation of China stepping into a high-risk society through the analysis of the characteristics of China's social transformation. When it comes to the problem of adjacent avoidance, the numerous risks accumulated by "compressed" modernization have become an important inducement for the frequent occurrence of conflict avoidance in the immediate neighbourhood. These risks are manifested in the organized irresponsibility of environmental risks and the technological phobia caused by technological risks. The anxiety caused by people's excessive risk cognition and the crisis of local government trust under the cycle of risk-trust causality clearly explain the background of the generation of social stability risk in neighboring conflict avoidance society. The fourth and fifth chapters are the core chapters of this paper, respectively from the risk production, accumulation, diffusion, mutation and reproduction of these five aspects of the evolution of the risk of conflict avoidance social stability, and on the basis of the formation mechanism. Five types of social stability risk of adjacent conflict avoidance are put forward, including decision type social stability risk, fair social stability risk, interest appeal social stability risk, network rumor social stability risk and governance social stability risk. The sixth chapter puts forward the governance strategy of the social stability risk of avoiding conflict on the basis of the previous analysis, mainly from the two aspects of eliminating the risk of adjacent facilities and avoiding the risk of adjacent conflict, including the establishment of risk awareness. Some suggestions are put forward on how to respect and protect the rights and interests of the people, to establish the consultation system including citizen participation mechanism, information sharing mechanism, risk communication mechanism and so on, and to strengthen the service concept of local government to improve the responsiveness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉巖;;發(fā)展與風(fēng)險(xiǎn):現(xiàn)代性的兩歧——西方風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)理論述析[J];北華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

2 賈金玲;;轉(zhuǎn)型期社會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與當(dāng)代中國(guó)社會(huì)政策選擇[J];長(zhǎng)白學(xué)刊;2008年06期

3 郭巍青;陳曉運(yùn);;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的環(huán)境異議——以廣州市民反對(duì)垃圾焚燒廠建設(shè)為例[J];公共行政評(píng)論;2011年01期

4 劉濤;楊琳瑜;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)、虛擬社會(huì)管理與政府公信力建設(shè)[J];電子政務(wù);2012年11期

5 譚爽;;鄰避項(xiàng)目社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的生成及防范——基于焦慮心理的視角[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

6 曹祖耀;秦春;;鄰避設(shè)施及其社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范[J];中國(guó)工程咨詢;2012年12期

7 馮周卓;黃震;;原生與次生:社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的分類與治理[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年05期

8 王鋒;胡象明;劉鵬;;焦慮情緒、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)認(rèn)知與鄰避沖突的實(shí)證研究——以北京垃圾填埋場(chǎng)為例[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期

9 張樂;童星;;事件、爭(zhēng)論與權(quán)力:風(fēng)險(xiǎn)場(chǎng)域的運(yùn)作邏輯[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

10 馮必?fù)P;;社會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)關(guān)系探析[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 本報(bào)記者 周雁凌　季英德 董若義;[N];中國(guó)環(huán)境報(bào);2014年

2 本報(bào)見習(xí)記者 陳妍凌;[N];中國(guó)環(huán)境報(bào);2015年

3 主講人 南京大學(xué)政府管理學(xué)院教授 孔繁斌 本報(bào)記者 顏云霞 整理;[N];新華日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 呼文敏;技術(shù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的社會(huì)根源及其規(guī)避對(duì)策[D];東北大學(xué);2009年

2 王亞麗;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)中我國(guó)公共政策選擇研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2013年

3 蔡園利;“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)”理論視域下政府職能轉(zhuǎn)變問題研究[D];南京工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

4 梁玉婧;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)信息中的公正要素對(duì)權(quán)威信任的影響[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2013年

5 梁昀;基于利益相關(guān)者視角的政府重大決策社會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估研究[D];山西師范大學(xué);2014年

6 李玉娟;利益相關(guān)者視角下鄰避沖突解決機(jī)制研究[D];廣東海洋大學(xué);2014年

7 梁新;鄰避沖突治理模式轉(zhuǎn)換研究[D];南京大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2387328