公共服務(wù)“逆市場化”問題研究
[Abstract]:After the 1990s, the speed of the western countries' market-oriented development was gradually relaxed, and the phenomenon of "counter-marketization" appeared, that is, the government took back the self-management of the outsourced public services, and entered the post-market-oriented era. In recent years, this phenomenon has also appeared in the reform of public service marketization. The investigation of this phenomenon is of great strategic significance to the market-oriented reform of public service in China. By investigating the process of "reverse contract outsourcing" in county D sewage treatment plant, this paper finds that transaction cost and incentive structure in bureaucracy are the main reasons of "reverse marketization". The incentive structure of the government bureaucracy plays a more basic role. Although marketization can get rid of the internal production cost of independent operation to some extent, it will also bring extra transaction cost. If we fail to develop an effective mechanism to reduce transaction costs, government departments may make "counter-market" policy choices. But government managers are less concerned about costs than private managers. To a large extent, the behavior of grass-roots government officials is the projection of their environment and system, and the incentive structure of government bureaucracy affects their institutional choice behavior. In the case of "inverse marketization" of county D sewage treatment plant, from the micro level, the behavior choice of grass-roots officials in D county government department is affected by the internal performance incentive of the organization. From the macro level, whether it is the D county local governments choose to introduce private capital for outsourcing operations, or choose to withdraw outsourcing autonomy, the financial incentives within the organization is the most important factor hidden behind the government behavior. The transaction cost is based on this incentive structure to play a role. Therefore, the financial incentive structure of grassroots officials is the key to the anti-market behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:D630
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 楊安華;;金融危機(jī)對世界民營化發(fā)展的影響[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年11期
2 顏昌武;;公用事業(yè)民營化中的政府角色——基于深圳市梧桐山隧道事件的反思[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期
3 周志忍;;認(rèn)識市場化改革的新視角[J];中國行政管理;2009年03期
4 呂志奎;;政府合同治理的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析:委托—代理理論視角[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期
5 周黎安;;中國地方官員的晉升錦標(biāo)賽模式研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年07期
6 周飛舟;;分稅制十年:制度及其影響[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年06期
7 周飛舟;;從汲取型政權(quán)到“懸浮型”政權(quán)——稅費(fèi)改革對國家與農(nóng)民關(guān)系之影響[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;2006年03期
8 鄧樸;石正義;;公共服務(wù)市場化的主體多元性探析[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期
9 馬駿;交易費(fèi)用政治學(xué):現(xiàn)狀與前景[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年01期
,本文編號:2380785
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2380785.html