發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-11 06:40

【摘要】：公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核已經(jīng)成為公務(wù)員管理的關(guān)鍵所在。改進(jìn)和完善公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核,對(duì)于打造高效廉潔的政府,提升公務(wù)員隊(duì)伍的整體素質(zhì)和水平,不斷增強(qiáng)履職盡責(zé)的能力,具有十分突出的作用。T市S委是正局級(jí)行政機(jī)關(guān),所屬公務(wù)員基本屬于綜合管理類,具有該市市級(jí)機(jī)關(guān)公務(wù)員的普遍性；而該委公務(wù)員又具有領(lǐng)導(dǎo)職務(wù)占比較大、青年干部較多的特殊性,因此本文以T市S委為研究對(duì)象。本文首先分析了T市S委公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核的現(xiàn)狀,介紹了該委的基本架構(gòu)和人員結(jié)構(gòu)、現(xiàn)行的平時(shí)考核和年度考核方法；總結(jié)出現(xiàn)行考核辦法存在理念陳舊、方法主觀、程序簡(jiǎn)單、結(jié)果運(yùn)用不充分等不足,并從觀念意識(shí)、制度層面、崗位特點(diǎn)、操作環(huán)節(jié)等四個(gè)層面探討了績(jī)效考核存在問(wèn)題的成因；研究了英國(guó)、美國(guó)、日本等三個(gè)國(guó)家公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核制度,以及南昌市工商局、江蘇省、青島市在公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核方面的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)；以此為借鑒,提出了改進(jìn)T市S委公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核的對(duì)策,包括基于顧客至上的績(jī)效考核理念塑造、基于量化多元的績(jī)效考核方法改進(jìn)、基于程序規(guī)范的績(jī)效考核組織建設(shè)、基于合理適當(dāng)?shù)目?jī)效考核結(jié)果運(yùn)用等四個(gè)方面。 通過(guò)本文的研究,力圖實(shí)現(xiàn)以下創(chuàng)新：一是整合公務(wù)員管理的各個(gè)方面,包括晉升、培訓(xùn)、交流等,而不是單純以考核論考核,以期形成較為完善的公務(wù)員管理理論：二是以T市S委公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核為立足點(diǎn),注重與該市黨政機(jī)關(guān)績(jī)效考核管理的有機(jī)結(jié)合,旨在建立以公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核為重點(diǎn)環(huán)節(jié)的公務(wù)員績(jī)效管理系統(tǒng),從而使公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核的激勵(lì)作用得以發(fā)揮,成為機(jī)關(guān)績(jī)效管理的重要推動(dòng)力。
[Abstract]:Performance evaluation of civil servants has become the key to the management of civil servants. Improving and perfecting the performance appraisal of civil servants plays a very prominent role in building an efficient and clean government, improving the overall quality and level of the civil servants, and constantly enhancing their ability to perform their duties with due diligence. The civil servant belongs to the comprehensive management category and has the universality of the civil servants of the municipal organs of the city; and the civil servants of the commission have the particularity of having more leading posts and more young cadres, so this paper takes the S Committee of T City as the research object. This paper first analyzes the present situation of the performance appraisal of the S Committee of T City, introduces the basic structure and personnel structure of the committee, the current methods of assessment in peacetime and the year, and concludes that the current assessment methods are outdated in concept and subjective in method. This paper discusses the causes of the problems in performance appraisal from four aspects, such as concept consciousness, system characteristics, job characteristics and operation links, and studies the United Kingdom, the United States, the United Kingdom, the United States and the United States. The performance appraisal system of civil servants in three countries, such as Japan, and the advanced experience of Nanchang Municipal Bureau of Industry and Commerce, Jiangsu Province and Qingdao City in the performance appraisal of civil servants, is used for reference, and the countermeasures to improve the performance appraisal of civil servants in S Committee of T City are put forward. It includes four aspects: molding the concept of performance appraisal based on customer supremacy, improving performance appraisal method based on quantitative diversity, building performance appraisal organization based on procedure criterion, and applying the results of performance appraisal based on reasonable and appropriate performance appraisal. Through the research of this paper, we try to realize the following innovations: first, integrate all aspects of civil service management, including promotion, training, communication, etc. In order to form a more perfect civil servant management theory: second, based on T City S Committee civil servant performance appraisal, pay attention to the organic combination with the performance appraisal management of the party and government organs in this city. The purpose of this paper is to establish a civil service performance management system which focuses on the performance appraisal of civil servants, so that the incentive function of civil servants' performance appraisal can be brought into play and become an important driving force of the performance management of the organs.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D630.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉禹;中日公務(wù)員考核制度比較與分析[J];成都教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

2 陳錫安;公務(wù)員量化考核測(cè)評(píng)體系設(shè)計(jì)[J];中國(guó)人才;2004年02期

3 劉永昌;;360度績(jī)效考核法在公務(wù)員績(jī)效評(píng)估中的應(yīng)用[J];黨政干部論壇;2010年10期

4 丘麗云;;綠色GDP與干部政績(jī)考核[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年02期

5 陳煒華;;英國(guó)對(duì)公務(wù)員的績(jī)效考核與管理——公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核與管理赴英培訓(xùn)團(tuán)訪談[J];國(guó)際人才交流;2005年12期

6 李楠;陳建成;;國(guó)外公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒[J];管理觀察;2008年18期

7 劉文花;;公民參與公務(wù)員考核的可行性與實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑[J];黨政干部論壇;2013年12期

8 王叢漫;江華鋒;;模糊綜合評(píng)判法在我國(guó)公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核中的應(yīng)用[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2007年01期

9 黃顯中;李政;;我國(guó)公務(wù)員績(jī)效考核的現(xiàn)存問(wèn)題及改進(jìn)策略[J];湖南財(cái)經(jīng)高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

10 佟寶貴;英國(guó)政府現(xiàn)行公務(wù)員績(jī)效評(píng)估制度概述[J];決策借鑒;2001年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2263226