【摘要】：霍耐特的"為承認(rèn)而斗爭"和朗西埃的"為平等而斗爭"代表了當(dāng)代西方馬克思主義政治批判的兩種路徑。兩者的對話圍繞政治的本質(zhì)界定、政治批判的原則和實(shí)現(xiàn)政治的方法展開。在霍耐特看來,朗西埃區(qū)分了政治與警治導(dǎo)致政治空無內(nèi)容,其平等主義欲望的前提是非歷史的,其實(shí)現(xiàn)政治的方法是一種徹底斷裂的外在批判。朗西埃則認(rèn)為霍耐特的政治批判包含著理想的主體、理想的共同體和歷史目的論預(yù)設(shè),這種政治批判錯失了政治是一個反復(fù)斗爭的主體化過程,是一個以歧義為出發(fā)點(diǎn)的為平等而斗爭的過程。兩種路徑的實(shí)質(zhì)都是從理性批判展開政治批判。復(fù)興現(xiàn)代政治批判的關(guān)鍵不在于遵從當(dāng)代西方馬克思主義的理性批判,而在于回到馬克思的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)批判。
[Abstract]:Honet's struggle for recognition and Lonsier's struggle for Equality represent two paths of contemporary Western Marxist political criticism. Their dialogue revolves around the definition of the nature of politics, the principles of political criticism and the method of realizing politics. In Honet's view, Langsier distinguishes politics from police administration and makes politics empty, its premise of egalitarian desire is non-historical, and its method of realizing politics is a completely broken external critique. Lonsier believes that Honet's political criticism includes the ideal subject, ideal community and historical teleological presupposition. This kind of political criticism missed out on politics as a process of repeated struggle. It is a process of struggle for equality based on ambiguity. The essence of the two paths is to launch political criticism from rational criticism. The key to reviving modern political criticism lies not in conforming to the rational criticism of contemporary Western Marxism, but in returning to Marx's critique of political economy.
【作者單位】： 安徽師范大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金青年項目“馬克思主義意識形態(tài)的歷史與邏輯研究”[項目編號:13CKS038] 安徽省哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)規(guī)劃青年項目“當(dāng)代國外馬克思主義‘德法論爭'的最新進(jìn)展研究”[項目編號:AHSKQ2016D058]的階段性研究成果
【分類號】：D035
，

本文編號：2225024