【摘要】：挪威人類學家巴特的族群理論對國際社會科學的相關領域之影響歷久不衰。在巴特看來,族群邊界(ethnic boundary)是不同群體在互動過程中體現(xiàn)出來的,這一視角對于理解邊疆具有重要意義。邊疆在中國學界之所以為重要課題,乃因其與主權相關。然而,這僅僅是邊疆的一個方面。邊疆的概念早在主權觀念出現(xiàn)之前就已存在。因此,對邊疆的理解無法忽視不同文化或者族群之間互動的因素,邊疆因此是為"接觸區(qū)域"。當今,作為接觸區(qū)域的邊疆,互動的主體已經從不同文化與族群轉移到國家之間上來,但是,次國家主體互動依然存在。這類互動良莠混雜,但是可以確定的是,如果有關國家在所謂邊疆關注主權超乎民生,那就必定導致次國家主體互動日益走向消極面。巴特對我們理解邊疆的意義就在于,揭示了不同主體之間的邊界(boundary)的流動性。這種流動性是因為主體之間互動的后果。因此,從巴特的視角來理解邊疆,可以讓我們領略這個概念所固有的張力,及其在現(xiàn)實中的緊張。
[Abstract]:Bart, a Norwegian anthropologist, has long had an impact on international social sciences. In Bart's view, the (ethnic boundary) of ethnic boundary is embodied by different groups in the process of interaction, which is of great significance for understanding the frontier. Frontier is an important subject in Chinese academic circles because it is related to sovereignty. However, this is only one aspect of the frontier. The concept of frontier existed long before the concept of sovereignty appeared. Therefore, the understanding of the frontier can not ignore the interaction between different cultures or ethnic groups, so the frontier is a "contact area". Nowadays, as the frontier of contact area, the subject of interaction has been transferred from different cultures and ethnic groups to the state, but the sub-national subject interaction still exists. This kind of interaction is mixed, but it is certain that if the countries concerned pay more attention to sovereignty than people's livelihood in the so-called frontier, it will inevitably lead to a negative trend of sub-state interaction. Bart's significance to us in understanding the frontier lies in revealing the fluidity of the boundary (boundary) between different subjects. This fluidity is the result of interaction between subjects. Therefore, to understand the frontier from Bart's perspective can give us an appreciation of the tension inherent in the concept and its tension in reality.
【作者單位】： 南京大學社會學院人類學研究所;
【分類號】：C95
，

本文編號：2166733