發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-13 16:59

【摘要】：政府工作部門(mén)績(jī)效考核是針對(duì)政府內(nèi)部管理一種十分有效的現(xiàn)代管理方法,不僅為找到部門(mén)管理中存在的問(wèn)題提供了途徑,還為部門(mén)提升管理水平、優(yōu)化服務(wù)提供了指引。因此,績(jī)效考核已經(jīng)成為地方政府部門(mén)轉(zhuǎn)變工作作風(fēng),提升服務(wù)質(zhì)量的主要管理手段。但在由于我國(guó)一直沒(méi)有對(duì)政府及其部門(mén)的績(jī)效考核明確相關(guān)的法律與政策規(guī)定,很多的地方政府及其部門(mén)的績(jī)效考核都還處于探索和摸索的階段。本文通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外政府部門(mén)績(jī)效考核演變歷史的基礎(chǔ)研究,對(duì)政府部門(mén)績(jī)效考核涵義和相關(guān)理論的分析以及類(lèi)似政府部門(mén)工作績(jī)效考核現(xiàn)狀的分析啟示,以德陽(yáng)市招商引資部門(mén)工作績(jī)效考核為藍(lán)本,通過(guò)對(duì)比的手法詳細(xì)闡述了自2001年以來(lái),德陽(yáng)市招商引資部門(mén)工作績(jī)效考核體系的主要內(nèi)容、考核主體、考核程以及結(jié)果應(yīng)用四個(gè)方面。并通過(guò)舉例分析,指出該考核體系存在的考核內(nèi)容倚重經(jīng)濟(jì)指標(biāo)、考核實(shí)施主體功能不全、考核程序重結(jié)果輕過(guò)程和考核結(jié)果只獎(jiǎng)不罰四個(gè)方面的問(wèn)題。同時(shí),抓住問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生的原因。即：目標(biāo)任務(wù)同比正增長(zhǎng)的壓力、考核實(shí)施單位范圍狹窄、過(guò)程考核機(jī)制不健全以及考核結(jié)果應(yīng)用片面化。最后,結(jié)合政府部門(mén)績(jī)效考核相關(guān)理論知識(shí)和我國(guó)其他地區(qū)類(lèi)似部門(mén)績(jī)效考核實(shí)踐的啟示,針對(duì)德陽(yáng)市招商引資部門(mén)工作績(jī)效考核的現(xiàn)狀和不足之處,提出從把項(xiàng)目引進(jìn)的產(chǎn)業(yè)類(lèi)別以及項(xiàng)目質(zhì)量納入對(duì)到位資金量化經(jīng)濟(jì)指標(biāo)、增加對(duì)當(dāng)年新引進(jìn)重大項(xiàng)目社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)影響力的外部評(píng)價(jià)和規(guī)范投資項(xiàng)目到位資金認(rèn)定范圍三個(gè)方面來(lái)完善目標(biāo)任務(wù)設(shè)定；從引入行業(yè)或產(chǎn)業(yè)的主管部門(mén)與原有考核實(shí)施主體搭配進(jìn)行考核和增加落地項(xiàng)目受益民眾外部評(píng)議兩個(gè)方面來(lái)拓展考核主體范圍；從實(shí)施臺(tái)帳過(guò)程管理、建立績(jī)效問(wèn)責(zé)機(jī)制和考核申訴機(jī)制三個(gè)方面來(lái)改進(jìn)考核的程序；從考核結(jié)果的反饋機(jī)制、主考部門(mén)的日常管理修正建議和考核結(jié)果獎(jiǎng)懲并舉三個(gè)方面提高績(jī)效考核結(jié)果應(yīng)用強(qiáng)度的對(duì)策建議。試圖優(yōu)化德陽(yáng)市現(xiàn)有招商引資部門(mén)工作績(jī)效考核體系,增強(qiáng)其可操作性,為其他類(lèi)似部門(mén)的績(jī)效考核工作提供一些思路。
[Abstract]:Performance appraisal of government departments is a very effective modern management method for internal management of government. It not only provides a way to find the problems existing in the management of departments, but also provides guidance for departments to improve their management level and optimize their services. Therefore, performance appraisal has become the main management means for local government to change their work style and improve service quality. However, due to the lack of clear laws and policies on the performance appraisal of the government and its departments, many local governments and their departments are still in the stage of exploration and exploration. Through the basic research on the evolution history of government performance appraisal at home and abroad, this paper analyzes the meaning and relevant theories of government performance appraisal and the analysis of the current situation of performance appraisal of similar government departments. In this paper, the main contents and the main body of the performance appraisal system of the investment departments in Deyang City since 2001 have been explained in detail by means of comparison with the work performance appraisal of the investment departments in Deyang City, which is based on the model of the performance appraisal of the departments of investment promotion and investment promotion in Deyang City. The evaluation procedure and the application of the results are four aspects. Through the analysis of examples, it is pointed out that there are four problems in the examination system: the content of the examination depends on the economic index, the main function of the evaluation implementation is not complete, the evaluation procedure emphasizes the result less than the process, and the examination result is only awarded without penalty. At the same time, grasp the causes of the problem. That is, the pressure of positive growth of target tasks, the narrow scope of the evaluation implementation units, the imperfect process assessment mechanism and the one-sided application of the assessment results. Finally, combined with the relevant theoretical knowledge of government performance appraisal and other similar departments in our country performance appraisal practice enlightenment, in view of the current situation and shortcomings of performance appraisal of investment departments in Deyang City. From the introduction of the project into the industry category and the quality of the project into the quantification of the economic indicators of funds in place, Increasing the external evaluation of the social and economic impact of the major new projects introduced in that year and standardizing the scope of identification of the funds in place of the investment projects to improve the setting of the objectives and tasks; To expand the scope of the assessment subject from two aspects: introducing the industry or the competent department of the industry and matching the original assessment and implementing main body and increasing the external comments of the beneficiary of the landing project, and from the implementation of the accounting process management, Establish performance accountability mechanism and appraisal appeal mechanism to improve the evaluation process; from the assessment results feedback mechanism, The suggestions to improve the application intensity of the performance appraisal results in three aspects: the suggestions of daily management revision and the rewards and punishments of the examination results of the examiners. This paper attempts to optimize the performance appraisal system of the existing departments of attracting investment in Deyang, enhance its operability, and provide some ideas for the performance appraisal of other similar departments.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李金龍;馬駿;;基于平衡計(jì)分卡的地方政府招商引資績(jī)效評(píng)估體系的設(shè)計(jì)[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2009年12期

2 付景濤;倪星;;論地方政府在績(jī)效評(píng)估中的理性選擇——以珠海市為例[J];嶺南學(xué)刊;2009年02期

3 周志忍;;我國(guó)政府績(jī)效管理研究的回顧與反思[J];公共行政評(píng)論;2009年01期

4 袁素平;;政績(jī)考核標(biāo)準(zhǔn)改革芻議[J];安陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

5 尚虎平;;大國(guó)崛起的地方政府激勵(lì)與效率之路——我國(guó)改革30年地方政府績(jī)效評(píng)估厘清、反思與展望[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革;2008年03期

6 倪星;;反思中國(guó)政府績(jī)效評(píng)估實(shí)踐[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

7 柴茂;;地方政府績(jī)效評(píng)估體系研究——基于科學(xué)發(fā)展觀視角[J];成都行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

8 董梅生;;安徽省地方政府績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系構(gòu)建與實(shí)證分析[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

9 陳初f;;國(guó)內(nèi)外地方政府績(jī)效管理比較研究[J];佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

10 尚虎平;;“績(jī)效”晉升下我國(guó)地方政府非績(jī)效行為誘因——一個(gè)博弈論的解釋[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2007年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 鄭鑫;大慶市政府招商引資全過(guò)程項(xiàng)目化管理研究[D];東北石油大學(xué);2011年

2 唐琬;地方政府招商引資現(xiàn)狀及問(wèn)題研究[D];云南大學(xué);2010年

3 楊茜;地方政府招商引資服務(wù)效能評(píng)價(jià)和提升研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2010年

4 王丹丹;地方政府招商引資路徑分析[D];天津師范大學(xué);2010年

5 張寶明;地方政府招商引資問(wèn)題與對(duì)策研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2120109