依法治國視閾下信訪制度功能定位問題研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-06-29 11:39
本文選題:依法治國 + 信訪制度 ; 參考:《河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文
【摘要】:信訪制度自設(shè)立實(shí)施以來,歷經(jīng)半個(gè)多世紀(jì)之久。作為從黨的群眾路線中衍生出的制度設(shè)計(jì),信訪制度在一定的時(shí)期內(nèi)發(fā)揮了重要的積極作用。在制度設(shè)計(jì)之初,信訪制度發(fā)揮著權(quán)力監(jiān)督和信息溝通的雙重作用,公民通過信訪制度對國家公權(quán)力實(shí)現(xiàn)監(jiān)督,黨和政府通過信訪制度接收群眾批評和建議。然而,隨著時(shí)代背景的轉(zhuǎn)變,信訪制度在特殊時(shí)期擔(dān)當(dāng)了申冤平反的工具,異化出權(quán)利救濟(jì)的功能。隨著權(quán)利救濟(jì)功能的不斷膨脹、信息溝通與權(quán)力監(jiān)督功能的弱化,信訪制度開始暴露出與法治相悖的一面,即使這種沖突是由于其功能錯位而導(dǎo)致的結(jié)果,但信訪制度在實(shí)際運(yùn)行中消解司法權(quán)威的事實(shí)依然使其成為眾矢之的。信訪制度陷入困境的主要原因是其功能的錯位,導(dǎo)致其功能錯位的具體原因體現(xiàn)在多方面,主要是傳統(tǒng)文化的影響、政治體制的影響、經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的影響、制度自身的弊端、機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置的龐雜和群眾的思維慣性。針對錯綜復(fù)雜的原因,在依法治國的大背景下、基于我國基本國情的基礎(chǔ)上,從理論和實(shí)踐角度來著手改革信訪制度。信訪制度的改革是一個(gè)長期而艱巨的過程,在明確信訪制度功能定位的同時(shí),信訪部門要順應(yīng)時(shí)代的發(fā)展需求,變被動為主動,積極探索網(wǎng)絡(luò)信訪的發(fā)展空間。整合信訪機(jī)構(gòu)、提高公民的法治意識、完善司法體制建設(shè),弱化信訪制度救濟(jì)功能的同時(shí)強(qiáng)化司法救濟(jì)的主體地位,走漸進(jìn)式改革的方式引導(dǎo)信訪制度實(shí)現(xiàn)法治化,與依法治國并行不悖。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment and implementation of the petition system, it has gone through more than half a century. As a system design derived from the mass line of the Party, the petition system has played an important and positive role in a certain period. At the beginning of the system design, the petition system played a dual role of power supervision and information communication. Citizens supervised the state public power through the petition system, and the party and government received criticism and suggestions from the masses through the petition system. However, with the change of the background of the times, the petition system acts as a tool for redress of grievances in a special period and dissimilates the function of right relief. With the expansion of the right relief function and the weakening of the function of information communication and power supervision, the letter and visit system begins to expose the opposite side of the rule of law, even though the conflict is the result of its function dislocation. But the fact that the petition system dispels the judicial authority in practice still makes it a target. The main reason for the difficulty of the petition system is the dislocation of its function. The specific reasons leading to the dislocation of its function are embodied in many aspects, mainly the influence of traditional culture, the influence of political system, the influence of economic development, the malpractice of the system itself. The complexity of the organization and the inertia of the people's thinking. In view of the complicated reasons, under the background of ruling the country according to law and on the basis of the basic national conditions of our country, the system of letters and visits should be reformed from the angle of theory and practice. The reform of the petition system is a long and arduous process. While defining the function of the letter and visit system, the petition department should adapt to the development needs of the times, turn passivity into initiative, and actively explore the development space of the network letter and visit system. Integrating the petition institutions, improving citizens' awareness of the rule of law, perfecting the construction of the judicial system, weakening the relief function of the petition system and strengthening the main position of the judicial relief, and guiding the petition system to achieve the rule of law by the way of gradual reform. Running the country side by side with the rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:D632.8
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 鄭延譜;;“依法治國”理念的形成考釋[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2015年02期
2 熊翔宇;;改革完善我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)信訪工作的思考[J];四川行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期
3 許迎玲;;信訪制度改革路徑綜述[J];才智;2014年04期
4 安麗娜;;用法治新思維推動信訪工作法治化[J];信訪與社會矛盾問題研究;2014年01期
5 王祥修;;關(guān)于我國信訪功能定位的思考[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2013年02期
6 李俊;;歐洲監(jiān)察專員制度對我國信訪制度改革的啟示[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期
7 李步云;;依法治國歷史進(jìn)程的回顧與展望[J];法學(xué)論壇;2008年04期
8 周永坤;;信訪潮與中國糾紛解決機(jī)制的路徑選擇[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年01期
9 于建嶸;對信訪制度改革爭論的反思[J];中國黨政干部論壇;2005年05期
10 于建嶸;中國信訪制度批判[J];中國改革;2005年02期
,本文編號:2081996
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2081996.html
最近更新
教材專著