本文選題：圖書盜版盜印 + 政府治理��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：圖書盜版盜印現(xiàn)象一直以來是影響我國出版業(yè)健康發(fā)展的一顆毒瘤。隨著時代的發(fā)展,它并沒有被淘汰,反而愈演愈烈,不斷“創(chuàng)新”,盜版不是傳統(tǒng)意義上的盜版,盜印也不簡單的復(fù)印,它們在相互融合,打著擦邊球存在于社會中,不但在市場競爭中侵害了合法經(jīng)營者的權(quán)益,破壞了正常的市場秩序,同時也損害了版權(quán)人的應(yīng)得權(quán)益,還阻礙了我國社會主義文化建設(shè)。雖然我國政府對圖書盜版盜印持堅決打擊的態(tài)度,在立法、司法上針對該行為做出了相應(yīng)的規(guī)定,以防止該現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生,但是,我國當(dāng)前版權(quán)意識并沒有深入人心,同時圖書盜版盜印存在著高額的利潤,驅(qū)使無良商販做出違反法律的盜版盜印行為,以及近年來社會上存在的“山寨”風(fēng)氣,圖書盜版盜印行為越發(fā)猖厥。如何整頓圖書盜版盜印現(xiàn)象,是政府加強社會主義文化建設(shè),提高全民族文明素質(zhì),全面建設(shè)小康社會中的重要課題。本文以我國政府對圖書盜版盜印問題治理為研究對象,以公共行政理論、公共治理理論、公共選擇理論、新公共管理理論等相關(guān)理論為理論基礎(chǔ),以對國內(nèi)外政府治理圖書盜版盜印的研究情況加以總結(jié)為參考,通過問卷調(diào)查的方式對當(dāng)前我國政府治理圖書盜版盜印的現(xiàn)狀進行調(diào)查分析�？偨Y(jié)我國政府在治理圖書盜版盜印取得的成績同時,找出存在的問題與不足,針對問題尋找原因,借鑒美國、新加坡等對圖書等知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護較為突出的國家的經(jīng)驗,探索解決問題的方法對策。結(jié)合當(dāng)前我國的國情,同時借鑒美國、新加坡等對圖書等知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護較為突出的國家的經(jīng)驗,本文提出了加強我國政府治理圖書盜版盜印的對策建議:首先,發(fā)揮政府主導(dǎo)作用,加強政府部門之間的聯(lián)系,建立政府、公眾共同參與機制,充分調(diào)動出版社等權(quán)利人的自我維權(quán)意識;其次,完善相關(guān)法律法規(guī)體系,完善出版市場準(zhǔn)入制度,運用價格法加強對圖書業(yè)的價格調(diào)控;再次,加大執(zhí)法力度,規(guī)范執(zhí)法工作隊伍;最后,重視日常管理,持久深入地開展反圖書盜版盜印工作,同時發(fā)展經(jīng)濟,提高公民購買正版圖書能力,加強輿論宣傳,提高社會打擊圖書盜版盜印的認(rèn)同感。一系列的對策初探,力求對我國政府治理圖書盜版盜印問題上提出建設(shè)性意見,從而對我國現(xiàn)有的打擊圖書盜版盜印措施和手段予以完善,希望能對制定更加有效地打擊圖書盜版盜印和保護知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的政策獻言獻策。
[Abstract]:The phenomenon of piracy and theft of books has always been a malignant tumor that affects the healthy development of China's publishing industry. With the development of the times, it has not been eliminated. Instead, it is becoming more and more vigorous and constantly "innovating". Piracy is not a traditional piracy, and the theft is not simply copied. They are merging with each other in society, not only in society, but also in society. In the market competition, the rights and interests of the legal operators are violated, the normal market order is destroyed, and the rights and interests of the copyright owners are damaged, and the construction of our socialist culture is hindered. Although our government has a resolute attack on the piracy and theft of books in China, it has made the corresponding provisions in the legislation and the judicature to prevent it. In order to stop this phenomenon, the current copyright consciousness of our country has not been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. At the same time, there is a high profit in the piracy and theft of books, which drives the unscrupulous traders to make illegal piracy and piracy, as well as the "Shanzhai" behavior in the society in recent years, and the theft of books is more and more rampant. The phenomenon of printing is an important topic for the government to strengthen the construction of socialist culture, improve the quality of the whole nation and build a well-off society in an all-round way. This article takes the government of our government to study the problem of piracy and theft of books as the research object, with the theory of public administration, public governance theory, public choice theory and new public management theory as the theoretical basis. On the basis of summarizing the domestic and foreign government's research on piracy and theft of books, this paper makes a survey and Analysis on the current situation of government administration of piracy and theft of books by the government. To find out the reasons, draw lessons from the experience of the states which are more prominent in the protection of intellectual property rights in the United States and Singapore, and explore the methods and Countermeasures to solve the problems. In the light of the current national conditions of our country and the experience of the countries with prominent protection of intellectual property rights in books such as the United States and Singapore, this article puts forward to strengthen our government to govern books theft. The countermeasures are as follows: first, give full play to the government's leading role, strengthen the relationship between the government departments, establish the government, the public participation mechanism, fully mobilize the self-protection consciousness of the publishers and other rights holders; secondly, improve the relevant laws and regulations system, improve the market access system, and use the price law to strengthen the price adjustment of the book industry. Thirdly, strengthen the law enforcement and standardize the law enforcement team; finally, pay attention to the daily management, carry out the anti Book piracy and theft printing work, develop the economy, improve the citizens' ability to buy the positive books, strengthen the public opinion propaganda, and improve the identity of the social attack on the piracy and theft of books. In order to improve the existing measures and means to combat books piracy and theft, we hope to make suggestions on making more effective measures to combat books piracy, piracy, piracy and protection of intellectual property rights.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D630;D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 唐新華;;中國與新加坡知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度比較研究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟;2016年09期

2 游禎武;;試析圖書盜版問題[J];新聞研究導(dǎo)刊;2016年11期

3 馬君;;歷年世界知識產(chǎn)權(quán)日主題回顧[J];中華商標(biāo);2016年04期

4 張莉惠;;基于經(jīng)濟法視閾下圖書盜版的法律規(guī)制研究[J];傳播與版權(quán);2016年02期

5 保雅坤;;計算機軟件盜版侵權(quán)行為的認(rèn)定與證明[J];科技傳播;2014年09期

6 肖燕;;《著作權(quán)法》第三次修訂與國際著作權(quán)立法進展評析[J];圖書館雜志;2014年03期

7 苑春;鄭小強;;圖書盜版的博弈分析——基于多人及多種群演化博弈理論[J];出版科學(xué);2013年03期

8 周園;鄧宏光;;論視聽作品作者的利益分享權(quán)——以《中華人民共和國著作權(quán)法》第三次修訂為中心[J];法商研究;2013年03期

9 王群;鄧世豹;;大學(xué)生版權(quán)意識現(xiàn)狀研究[J];當(dāng)代青年研究;2013年01期

10 鐘柏昌;李藝;;問卷調(diào)查方法在教育研究領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用狀況分析[J];開放教育研究;2012年06期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 璩靜;;全國“掃黃打非”工作小組表彰天津破獲侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)大案 要案[N];人民日報;2009年

2 藍有林;;教材盜版：利益驅(qū)動下的傷痛[N];中國圖書商報;2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馬瓊麗;當(dāng)代中國行政中的公眾參與研究[D];云南大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李成鳳;版權(quán)人與著作權(quán)集體管理組織法律關(guān)系研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

2 趙麗萍;《大清著作權(quán)律》研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

3 毛娟;圖書價格政策研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1972306