本文選題：政府回應(yīng)　切入點(diǎn)：網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐是網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代新興的一種反腐敗形式,然而由于其政府回應(yīng)行為存在差異化特征,對(duì)其反腐實(shí)效造成了嚴(yán)重制約。因此,對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐事件中政府回應(yīng)行為是什么,且為什么存在差異,應(yīng)該采取哪些措施改善現(xiàn)狀,成為亟待研究的學(xué)術(shù)問題。通過對(duì)前人研究和相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行梳理,以2008年到2017年間189個(gè)網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐案例的實(shí)踐情況為基礎(chǔ),本文將這一領(lǐng)域的政府回應(yīng)行為作為研究對(duì)象,對(duì)其概念、行為呈現(xiàn)、特點(diǎn)、現(xiàn)狀和作用進(jìn)行描述,繼而闡釋其產(chǎn)生邏輯,探究其影響因素,構(gòu)建模型進(jìn)行假設(shè)檢驗(yàn),并提出改善思路。從動(dòng)機(jī)、參與者、內(nèi)容和作用等四個(gè)維度考慮,可以將網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐事件中的政府回應(yīng)行為劃分為三類:調(diào)查處理類、否認(rèn)澄清類和周邊信息類。調(diào)查處理類政府回應(yīng)主要指對(duì)事件進(jìn)行調(diào)查處理的官方反腐機(jī)構(gòu)所提供有關(guān)事件處理情況;否認(rèn)澄清類政府回應(yīng)主要是指網(wǎng)絡(luò)曝光的腐敗線索所涉及官員和其所在政府部門對(duì)于這些信息的辯解、承認(rèn)或者其他表示;周邊信息類政府回應(yīng)主要是除了對(duì)事件進(jìn)行調(diào)查處理的紀(jì)律部門,從其他政府渠道產(chǎn)生的有關(guān)政府回應(yīng)信息。這一領(lǐng)域內(nèi)政府回應(yīng)行為的動(dòng)機(jī)復(fù)雜多樣,權(quán)威性存在差異,呈現(xiàn)出較為明顯的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)特征,且存在一些被動(dòng)性,對(duì)于事件演化有著關(guān)鍵作用。以政府回應(yīng)行為用時(shí)作為觀測(cè)指標(biāo),可以發(fā)現(xiàn)其現(xiàn)狀差強(qiáng)人意,但呈現(xiàn)出積極的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐事件中,調(diào)查處理類政府回應(yīng)行為的產(chǎn)生是政府系統(tǒng)和網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境內(nèi)外部共同作用的結(jié)果,據(jù)此提出了研究假設(shè),認(rèn)為政治領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、政府信息公開程度、涉事官員的行政職級(jí)、涉事官員的職務(wù)、線索曝光平臺(tái)、爆料人形式、信息化程度等可能是其影響因素。通過二元Logistic模型進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)分析發(fā)現(xiàn),網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐事件中政治領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、涉事官員的行政職級(jí)、涉事官員是否擔(dān)任部門正職領(lǐng)導(dǎo)職位、爆料人是否實(shí)名對(duì)政府回應(yīng)行為用時(shí)皆有顯著影響,然而政府部門的信息公開程度、信息化程度的影響并不顯著。由此可知,網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐事件中政府回應(yīng)行為是外部壓力如網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論、爆料人和內(nèi)部動(dòng)力即政治領(lǐng)導(dǎo)共同推動(dòng)的,且?guī)в休^強(qiáng)的“人治”色彩,涉事官員的行政職級(jí)和具體職務(wù)也可能對(duì)其產(chǎn)生消極影響。為改善網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐事件中的政府回應(yīng)現(xiàn)狀,應(yīng)建立和完善有關(guān)制度法規(guī)、組織機(jī)構(gòu)、信息平臺(tái)和行政文化,并且正確引導(dǎo)網(wǎng)絡(luò)公民政治參與。推進(jìn)網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐的規(guī)范化,可以從改善其政府回應(yīng)行為入手。此外,后續(xù)研究和實(shí)踐可以深入考察政府回應(yīng)行為的內(nèi)容質(zhì)量,探討互聯(lián)網(wǎng)與政府回應(yīng)行為之間的聯(lián)系,并將政府回應(yīng)向常態(tài)化方向發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Network anti-corruption is a new form of anti-corruption in the network age. However, because of the different characteristics of government response, it has a serious restriction on the effectiveness of anti-corruption. Therefore, what is the government response to the network anti-corruption? And why there are differences, what measures should be taken to improve the status quo, become an urgent academic problem. Through the previous research and related theories, based on the practice of 189 network anti-corruption cases from 2008 to 2017. This paper takes the government response behavior in this field as the research object, describes its concept, behavior presentation, characteristics, current situation and function, then explains its producing logic, explores its influencing factors, and constructs a model for hypothesis testing. Considering the four dimensions of motivation, participant, content and function, the government response behavior in the network anti-corruption incident can be divided into three categories: investigation and handling. (B) denial of clarification and peripheral information. The response of the Government to the investigation and handling category refers mainly to the handling of the incident provided by the official anti-corruption agency involved in the investigation and handling of the incident; Denial of clarification of government responses mainly refers to officials involved in online revelations of corruption clues and their government departments' justifications, acknowledgements or other indications of such information; Peripheral information government responses are mainly related government response information from other government sources, in addition to disciplinary departments that investigate and handle incidents. In this area, the motives for government responses are complex and varied, and there are differences in authority. It shows obvious Internet features and some passivity, which plays a key role in the evolution of events. Taking the time of government response as an observation indicator, we can find that the current situation is not satisfactory. However, there is a positive development trend. In the network anti-corruption incident, the emergence of the response behavior of investigation and handling of government is the result of the internal and external interaction of government system and network environment. Based on this, the research hypotheses are put forward, and political leaders are considered as political leaders. The degree of disclosure of government information, the administrative rank of the officials involved, the position of the officials involved, the platform for exposure of clues, the form of the source and the degree of information may be the influencing factors. Through the data analysis of the binary Logistic model, it is found that, In the network anti-corruption incident, the political leaders, the administrative rank of the officials involved, whether the officials concerned hold the leading positions in the departments, and whether the actual names of the informants have a significant impact on the use of the government's response behavior, however, the extent to which the information of the government departments is made public. The influence of information level is not obvious. From this, we can see that the government's response behavior in the network anti-corruption incident is promoted by external pressure such as network public opinion, whistle-blowers and internal power, that is, political leadership, and has a strong "rule by man" color. In order to improve the current situation of the government response to the network anti-corruption incident, it is necessary to establish and improve relevant systems, regulations, organizations, information platforms and administrative culture. And correctly guide the political participation of network citizens. To promote the standardization of network anti-corruption, we can start with improving the government response behavior. In addition, further research and practice can further investigate the content quality of government response behavior. To explore the relationship between the Internet and government response, and to normalize government response.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬亮;;電子政務(wù)使用如何影響公民信任:政府透明與回應(yīng)的中介效應(yīng)[J];公共行政評(píng)論;2016年06期

2 李鋒;孟天廣;;策略性政治互動(dòng):網(wǎng)民政治話語運(yùn)用與政府回應(yīng)模式[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2016年05期

3 許鑫;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)公共事件政府回應(yīng)的現(xiàn)狀、問題與策略——基于2007-2014年102個(gè)案例的實(shí)證分析[J];情報(bào)雜志;2016年07期

4 何永松;;地方政府回應(yīng)性話語問題研究[J];云南行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

5 陳新;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時(shí)代政府回應(yīng)能力建設(shè)研究——基于現(xiàn)代國家治理的視角[J];中國行政管理;2015年12期

6 文宏;黃之s，

本文編號(hào)：1590419