本文關鍵詞： 群體性事件 危機預警 政府生態(tài) SWOT分析法　出處：《天津師范大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：社會特性與行政環(huán)境的動態(tài)變遷是政府職能定位與角色調(diào)試的重要考量要素之一。政府基本職能明確定位于經(jīng)濟調(diào)解、市場監(jiān)管、社會管理和公共服務,近些年尤其強調(diào)社會管理和公共服務這兩項職能。群體性公共危機治理是當前我國政府社會管理與公共服務職能履行的重要領域之一。作為維持經(jīng)濟和社會健康、和諧、有序、理性發(fā)展的基本要求,政府群體性社會公共危機治理多以應急為主,忽視危機預警的優(yōu)越性,導致政府職能履行困境重重,如“全能型”政府束縛治理渠道的拓展,忽視危機預警階段和預警信息支付平臺建設,預案設計、演練上受到質(zhì)疑等。為此,政府要正視群體性事件預警管理中的問題和現(xiàn)狀,明晰政府進行群體性事件預警管理的目標。在經(jīng)濟環(huán)境、政治環(huán)境和文化環(huán)境三個視域下政府生態(tài)環(huán)境分析基礎之上,從組織優(yōu)勢、組織劣勢、外部機遇和外部挑戰(zhàn)為主要組成的行政環(huán)境出發(fā),具體進行群體性事件預警管理中的政府職能轉變戰(zhàn)略分析,政府在群體性公共危機預警戰(zhàn)略指導下采取職能轉變的具體策略。 本文采用文獻分析法與實證分析法具體研究了群體性事件管理的政府職能目標、群體性事件預警管理的政府職能問題分析,采用SWOT分析法,具體分析了社會轉型過程中政府行政環(huán)境的內(nèi)部優(yōu)勢(S)、劣勢(w)和外部機會(0)及威脅(T)。研究過程主張在優(yōu)勢-機會、優(yōu)勢-威脅、劣勢-機會、劣勢-威脅不同的環(huán)境要素矩陣組合中定位政府群體性事件預警的不同戰(zhàn)略：SO戰(zhàn)略、ST戰(zhàn)略、0w戰(zhàn)略和OT戰(zhàn)略。政府在進行群體性事件預警工作中,必須要時時關注群體性事件發(fā)展的整體態(tài)勢,借鑒系統(tǒng)思維,根據(jù)動態(tài)的環(huán)境變化實行政府群體性事件預警職能戰(zhàn)略的動態(tài)決策運行機制。最后,就有限政府職能范圍、關注焦點、作用重心、職能實現(xiàn)主體、技術和實現(xiàn)機制的轉變等方面提出群體性公共危機預警中政府職能轉變的新路徑建議。
[Abstract]:The dynamic change of social characteristics and administrative environment is one of the important factors of government function orientation and role adjustment. The basic functions of government are clearly defined in economic mediation, market supervision, social management and public services. In recent years, special emphasis has been placed on the two functions of social management and public service. The governance of group public crisis is one of the most important areas of government social management and public service. . Harmonious, orderly and rational development of the basic requirements, the government group social public crisis management mostly to emergency, ignoring the superiority of crisis early warning, resulting in the government functions to perform difficulties. Such as "omnipotent" government restrains the development of governance channels, ignoring the crisis early warning stage and early warning information payment platform construction, plan design, drills and so on. The government should face squarely the problems and the present situation in the early warning management of mass incidents, and make clear the target of the early warning management of group incidents in the economic environment. On the basis of the analysis of the ecological environment of the government under the three perspectives of political environment and cultural environment, the administrative environment is mainly composed of organizational advantages, organizational weaknesses, external opportunities and external challenges. Under the guidance of the early warning strategy of group public crisis, the government adopts the specific strategy of function transformation. This article uses the literature analysis method and the empirical analysis method to study the government function goal of the group event management, the government function analysis of the group incident early warning management, and the SWOT analysis method. The paper concretely analyzes the internal advantages of the government administrative environment in the process of social transformation, including the internal advantages, disadvantages and external opportunities, and the threat. The research process advocates the advantage-opportunity, advantage-threat. Inferior-opportunity, inferiority and threat in different environmental element matrix combinations, different strategies of early warning of government group events are located in different strategies: so strategy and St strategy. 0w strategy and OT strategy. The government must always pay attention to the overall situation of the development of group events and draw lessons from the systematic thinking in the early warning of group incidents. According to the dynamic changes of the environment to implement the dynamic decision-making and operation mechanism of the early warning function strategy of government group events. Finally, focus on the limited scope of government functions, focus on the role of focus, function realization of the main body. This paper puts forward a new way to change the government's function in the early warning of group public crisis from the aspects of technology and realization mechanism.
【學位授予單位】：天津師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D631.43;D630

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊松;什么是集體行為?——帕克對集體行為的解釋[J];百科知識;1996年04期

2 胡振亞;任中平;;論“鄉(xiāng)政村治”中鄉(xiāng)村關系的兩種極端走向及調(diào)適[J];重慶郵電學院學報(社會科學版);2006年02期

3 于建嶸;;中國的社會泄憤事件與管治困境[J];當代世界與社會主義;2008年01期

4 郝繼明;;群體性事件治理新思路——構建預防、預警、預控體系[J];福建行政學院學報;2010年02期

5 黃順康;;論公共危機管理中的政府責任[J];甘肅社會科學;2006年01期

6 周錦章;;群體性事件產(chǎn)生的機會結構及對策[J];甘肅社會科學;2009年04期

7 彭蕭;甘卓群;;公共危機預警動力機制探略[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);2013年05期

8 杭t ;趙連章;;新型城鎮(zhèn)化進程中縣級政府的角色定位[J];當代世界與社會主義;2013年06期

9 陳世瑞;;群體性事件成因與參與動力機制研究[J];華章;2011年24期

10 張莉;;政府-社會-公民間的良性互動——善治視閾下群體性事件的解決之道[J];湖北行政學院學報;2010年03期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 高恩新;過程、行動者與危機管理[D];復旦大學;2008年

2 徐小江;我國轉型期群體性事件中的農(nóng)民問題[D];中央民族大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1489665