本文關鍵詞： 涉法涉訴信訪 律師 代理申訴 法治　出處：《四川省社會科學院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：目前,我國各項制度深化改革,社會經(jīng)濟建設高速發(fā)展,但社會法治建設進程緩慢,公民法律素養(yǎng)有待提升。如何應對轉(zhuǎn)型給社會穩(wěn)定帶來的種種壓力與挑戰(zhàn),如何扼制繁雜多元的涉法涉訴信訪矛盾沖突,鞏固社會的和諧穩(wěn)定,傳統(tǒng)信訪工作方式方法正遭遇瓶頸。面對大量涌現(xiàn)的新舊交疊的社會矛盾和社會問題,政法機關處理的大量各類矛盾糾紛的壓力也與日俱增,涉法涉訴信訪陷入管控失效的局面,重訪纏訪、越級上訪現(xiàn)象凸顯,涉法涉訴信訪積案難以終結,使得我國司法權威性和公正性受到強烈質(zhì)疑。社會治理體制不斷深化改革,在《關于進一步加強新時期信訪工作的意見》與《關于創(chuàng)新群眾工作方法解決信訪突出問題的意見》的政策指導下,信訪工作部門積極探索創(chuàng)新信訪工作方式方法,試圖引入社會第三方力量參與化解信訪矛盾糾紛,緩解信訪困境。2015年,為借助律師隊伍專業(yè)、親和、中立的執(zhí)業(yè)優(yōu)勢,重塑并強化符合依法治國理念的律師社會責任,《關于建立律師參與化解和代理涉法涉訴信訪案件制度的意見》正式提出要引入律師參與涉法涉訴信訪矛盾化解工作。該制度充分發(fā)揮律師隊伍的優(yōu)勢作用,促使律師參與并輔助政法機關緩和涉法涉訴信訪矛盾沖突,加強公權力機關與信訪群眾的有效溝通,瓦解信訪群眾“信訪不信法”的惡性根源,將涉法涉訴信訪問題引向法治救濟、終結軌道,深化涉法涉訴信訪工作的多元改革。綜上所述,針對律師參與化解和代理涉法涉訴信訪案件問題展開理論研究與實踐討論就顯得尤為迫切了。在本文中,筆者將從涉法涉訴信訪問題的政策法律依據(jù)、實踐調(diào)研探索、制度問題及原因分析、建立并完善律師參與涉法涉訴信訪案件制度等四個方面展開討論。依據(jù)各地實踐經(jīng)驗,以某市中院關于律師參與化解和代理涉法涉訴信訪案件制度試點情況為例,筆者試圖從堅持涉法涉訴信訪案件參與原則、搭建律師參與涉法涉訴信訪援助平臺、完善律師參與涉法涉訴信訪案件程序、加強參與涉法涉訴信訪案件律師管理這四個方面探討確立我省律師參與涉法涉訴信訪案件制度體系,以期有效發(fā)揮該制度的功能作用,緩解我省涉法涉訴信訪難題。
[Abstract]:At present, every system of our country deepens the reform, the social economic construction develops at a high speed, but the construction of the social rule of law is slow, the citizen's legal literacy needs to be improved. How to deal with the various pressures and challenges brought by the transformation to the social stability. How to control the complicated and pluralistic conflict of litigation, petition and petition, consolidate the social harmony and stability, the traditional method of petition work is facing the bottleneck, and face a large number of new and old overlapping social contradictions and social problems. The pressure of a large number of contradictions and disputes handled by the political and legal organs is also growing day by day. The legal litigation and petition fall into the situation of ineffective control and control. The phenomenon of repeated visits, leapfrogging petitions and visits is prominent, and it is difficult to end the backlog of cases involving litigation, petition and visit. The judicial authority and impartiality of our country are strongly questioned, and the social governance system continues to deepen the reform. Under the policy guidance of the "opinions on further strengthening the work of Letters and visits in the New period" and the "opinions on innovating the methods of Mass work to solve the prominent problems of Letters and visits". In 2015, the department actively explored the innovative methods of petition work, tried to introduce social third party forces to resolve the conflicts and disputes, and ease the plight of letters and visits. In 2015, it was professional and friendly with the help of lawyers. The neutral practice advantage reshapes and strengthens the lawyer's social responsibility which accords with the idea of governing the country by law. Opinions on the Establishment of the system of lawyers' participation in resolving and acting in cases involving lawsuits and petitions formally proposed that lawyers should be introduced into the work of resolving contradictions between litigation and petition involving in law, and that the system should give full play to the superior role of lawyers. We should urge lawyers to participate in and assist the political and legal organs to ease the conflicts between petition and petition, strengthen the effective communication between the public power organ and the people, and disintegrate the malignant root of the "letter and visit law". Legal issues related to litigation petitions and visits led to the rule of law relief, the end of the track, deepening the multiple reform of the law involving litigation letters and visits. To sum up. It is particularly urgent to study and discuss the theory and practice of lawyers' participation in resolving and acting in litigation cases. In this paper, the author will discuss the policy and legal basis of legal issues. Practical investigation and exploration, system problems and reasons analysis, the establishment and improvement of the system of lawyers involved in litigation, petition cases and other four aspects of the discussion, based on local practice experience. Taking the trial case system of lawyers' participation in resolving and acting for legal issues in a city as an example, the author tries to establish a platform for lawyers' participation in litigation, petition and petition by insisting on the principle of participating in litigation and petition cases. To perfect the procedure of lawyers' participation in litigation and petition cases and to strengthen the management of lawyers' participation in litigation, petition and visit cases, and to explore the establishment of the system of lawyers' participation in legal complaints, petitions and visits in our province. In order to give full play to the function of the system and alleviate the problem of litigation and petition in our province.
【學位授予單位】：四川省社會科學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D632.8;D926.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉茜;;淺析律師社會責任的發(fā)展困境[J];法制博覽;2016年29期

2 時延安;;律師在社會治理中的“當為”與“不為”[J];人民論壇;2016年S1期

3 鄧凱;季龍明;;全面依法治國語境下律師的功能定位——以政府和社會資本合作模式(PPP)中律師的角色為視角[J];牡丹江大學學報;2016年05期

4 楊建軍;;公益維權律師的法治促進功能[J];法學論壇;2016年02期

5 陳衛(wèi)東;趙恒;;刑事申訴聽證制度研究[J];法學雜志;2016年01期

6 禹治洪;;律師參與涉法涉訴信訪案件的理論架構和實踐探索[J];中國司法;2016年01期

7 朱旭光;;關于人民法院做好新形勢下涉訴信訪工作的思考[J];中國審判;2015年10期

8 凡俊;;應建立律師代理涉法涉訴信訪案件制度[J];人民檢察;2015年08期

9 欒少湖;;實行律師代理申訴制度的思考與啟示[J];中國法律評論;2015年01期

10 浙江省人民檢察院課題組;王祺國;;涉法涉訴信訪工作改革的法治化研究[J];法治研究;2015年02期

，

本文編號：1479567